What do you think?
Rate this book


528 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1986
It will help to have a knowledge of how the Roman republic was set up, that is, its magistrates, key offices, the Senate, Comitia Centuriata, and Comitia Tributa. Little of this is explained to the reader, who is presumed to know this. After which, the reader will benefit in learning how the army operated, legions, cohorts, and the like. Knowing this, well, in you go.
Experiencing the violent turbulence of the last century of the Republic’s existence, Caesar learned much and benefited from it, hence the title. He’s only young for a few chapters. The main story is his biography: where he went, what he did. In the background is the conflict, frequently violent with riots and murders, between the optimates and populares or, if you will, the well-to-do and the less wealthy. Caesar championed the latter. The author describes the wealthy party and its government as an oligarchy and explains what it does in terms of what typical oligarchies do (reckon he doesn’t like ‘em).
Much of how Caesar thought seems to have been influenced by Epicureanism. Quotes from the period greats are found in the text as they may have related to J.C.
Battles are fought and won or lost. There isn’t much about the movements or tactics. There probably isn’t that much information about them available two millennia later.
Everything you may have read or leaned about Cicero and Cataline in your third-year Latin is tossed out the window. The author sums Cicero up as a “trimmer.”
A major point which stuck with me is Caesar’s generosity in victory. He seemed to have a game plan to restructure the Republic and this did not sit well with the hide-bound aristocratic oligarchs who stood to lose big sesterces under this, so that explains the Ides of March. People are either “Caesarphiles” or “Caesarphobes”. The epilogue tells where the author stands.

