George Witte and Marc Resnick, editors. Sarah Lumnah, assistant editor. Rafal Gibek, production editor. Charles Haecker and Art Gomez, historian advisors. These people have much to answer for.
While Escape from Andersonville had an interesting premise, the actual execution failed in ways that could have, and should have been fixed during the editing phase, and the historical research was either very sloppy or mis-edited out of all comprehension.
The basic idea, that a military commander would be so obsessed with the safety of his men that he would attempt a raid to rescue them was fine. The thing is, as he goes up the chain of command to try to get the Union Army to rescue the prisoners at Andersonville, he is met with refusals, none of which contained the important, factual information: "We tried that, and it didn't work."
So, with the aid of a Louisiana freebooter with an odd sense of priorities, he puts together a private army and tries on his own. No plan, just ride up to a guarded prison, grab his own former troops, and escape, just like that. No, really.
As far as the historical parts, Tuscaloosa's capture and the burning of the University there were moved forward by a month from reality for no apparent reason. The timeline is already pretty bizarre, even without that. The central character rides hundreds of miles in a couple of days [offstage, of course] during the climactic chapters, and there is a phantom sharpshooter of almost supernatural nature and strange goals who is disposed of [off-stage], after a big build-up. In fact, several key scenes just aren't in the actual book. They happen when the reader's back is turned.
Then there's the editing. Odd word errors and incorrect word substitutions run rampant. On a revolver, the cylinder and the barrel are not the same thing. A copperhead and a carpetbagger are not the same thing. Fort Sumter and Camp Sumter are not the same place. No, really, they're not. A steamboat cabin is made to "look used" by having everything removed [?!?].
Worst, though, are the characters. Other than Captain Parker, a man who is obsessed, murderous and not very likeable, the cast consists of cardboard cutout characters, most of whom are defined by their own disreputable behavior, and get killed off almost randomly. Parker's quixotic quest kills off far more people than he was trying to save.
Gene Hackman and his co-author had a really good story idea, and a few really good scenes which kept this from receiving only one star, but overall it should have been better.