I was somewhat disappointed in this book, I know David Olusoga is a talented historian and writes very well, so I was looking forward to a detailed history of black British people that hadn't been told before. Instead, this book barely tells the story of any black individuals at all, but is instead focused on relations between Britain and black populations as communities with a major focus on slavery. The individuals who get mentioned most are mainly white e.g. Granville Sharp (35), Thomas Clarkson (12), Enoch Powell (14) . Frederick Douglass (who is of course American) gets only 10 mentions by contrast.
There is an odd victimisation narrative in a lot of history books I've read on slavery, which this book also follows. It says Black people today are suffering because of slavery/racism, due to a unbroken chain of history where Black people were oppressed as slaves, freed by white men who (racistly) still viewed black people were inferior and so for the next century or more, black people were still unable to break off the shackles of prejudice because of systemic bias. This victim-mentality is both corrosive and demonstrably untrue. The very narrative itself puts down Black people in exactly the way the "racist, patriarchal whites" contained in the narrative are supposed to have done and suggests that Black people lack the agency to succeed. It's all the more frustrating to read this nonsense when there are so many amazing Black people in British history to celebrate. Examples that don't get mentioned in this book, off the top of my head: Mary Seacole, Billy Ocean, Johnson Beharry, John Sentamu, Zadie Smith, Frank Bruno, Lenny Henry. Ira, Aldridge - one of the highest paid actors in the world of his time only gets mentioned in the introduction as having married a white woman - nothing about his own accomplishments and career, not even a passing reference that he was an actor!
Since Olusoga was extending his history of "Black and British" to cover not just the history of individual people who are both Black & British, but rather the wider impact of Britain on Black people around the world and Black people on Britain, then there are huge threads of history missing. The Anglican church is one of the most enduring legacies in former British colonies, surely Desmond Tutu and the phenomenal achievements in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission avoiding major bloodshed at the end of Apartheid would be worth mentioning. Or another big omission - the cultural impact of colonial/commonwealth links in art or literature - Wole Soyinka springs to mind.
The author has obviously faced prejudice and racism in his own life, so it's not really a surprise that he expects to see a thread of racism in history. Nonetheless, it feels like a real leap to say that Victorian Britain, which is acknowledged in this book as putting so much of its blood and treasure into ending the slave trade and where Uncle Tom's Cabin was a best-seller, was rampantly racist; even in a Olusoga's example of racism in society - a racist statement in a local newspaper - the black man who had been defamed received compensation from a court, hardly systemic discrimination.
When looking at more modern race relations/racism, Olusoga does point out that Enoch Powell got sacked for his speech and that the Race Relations Act was already on the books by the end of the 60s. The attempt to row back on the Nationality Act and restrict immigration may indicate racial bias in government policy, but more likely, as with today's points-based system, suggests that the local population tends to kick-off when there is large scale immigration and in a democracy that's a problem that politicians need to take notice of.
Ultimately, I see this as a missed opportunity. Rather than being a celebration of people who are black and British or looking at cultural enrichment, this is really a play-by-play of the abolitionist movement, which is not really a forgotten history since its on the National Curriculum.