Do I really need to hear step 1, step 2, step 3... step 12...step 37... step n... as n approaches infinity in the decision-making process of whether to have coffee, tea, cloudberry liqueur, some combination of these, or something different EVERY time this group has a snack? (and they snack OFTEN). NO!!! NO!!! I really have no need and no desire to hear this process every time. Especially since it is virtually the same process every time, and I then get to hear all of the steps on why it was a good or bad decision - often from more than one of the main characters, and then the whole thing again for whether they should have wafers, or cinnamon buns, or cake, or who really cares why am I being forced to read page after page of this tedium?!?
Then, I got to read the tedious, repetitive rants about social conditions in Sweden. Then, the tedious repetitive details about their plans and tedious, repetitive discussions on whether they can morally commit the crimes. Then, I got to wonder why anyone thinks the so-called plot twists are funny when they were fairly predictable and mostly just made me wonder how anyone who makes such stupid mistakes can pull off these crimes - OH! wait because the author just makes stuff up as she goes with no basis in the reality of how banks and museums, or police investigations, etc. work... I hate it when authors are too lazy to do their research and apparently think I am too stupid to notice.
And finally, really they are robbing a museum of its treasures to get money to support, among other things, the culture of their country - you know, by donating money to museums. How does that even make sense?!?
Sadly, while I found this book tedious to read, I might well be misguided enough to read the next one in the series. But then again, with my growing TBR list of good and potentially good books, probably not...