What do you think?
Rate this book


464 pages, Paperback
First published October 1, 1972
The employment of men as midwives, however, was vehemently denounced as a pernicious fashion, dangerous to the life of mother and child and destructive of female modesty. A "LETTER on the present State of MIDWIFERY" printed in the Virginia Gazette, October 1, 1772, expressed what appears to have been a rather general feeling. The writer argued that since "Labour is Nature's Work," no more art is necessary in assisting women than is taught by experience, and asked, "If Men-Midwives were requisite to bring Children into the World, what would become of the Wilds of America, the Plains of Africa?" Furthermore, he declared, "Women are infinitely safer than men," and continued: "It is a notorious fact that more Children have been lost since Women were so scandalously indecent as to employ Men than for Ages before that Practice became so general. [Women midwives] never dream of having recourse to Force; the barbarous, bloody Crochet, never stained their Hands with Murder.... A long unimpassioned Practice, early commenced, and calmly pursued is absolutely requisite to give Men by Art, what Women attain by Nature." Finally, he argued, the familiarities taken by men in attending pregnant women and those in labor are "sufficient to taint the Purity, and sully the Chastity, of any Woman breathing," and concluded with this pronouncement, "True Modesty is incompatible with the Idea of employing a MAN-MIDWIFE.