I’d give Blood Rose a 2.5 out of 5 stars. While it has its moments, it’s a mixed bag overall. The opening portion of the novel feels slow-paced and difficult to engage with. It takes a while for the story to pick up steam, but as the characters become more familiar, the narrative does improve. Among the cast, my favorite standouts are Jubal and Phillipia. They bring a certain depth and nuance that held my interest, even when the main plot occasionally dragged. That said, Phillipia’s dialogue was a bit jarring. She’s written in a way that doesn’t feel age-appropriate for a 7-year-old, making her somewhat unbelievable at times.
Jubal and Gunter’s storylines were, in my opinion, the most compelling aspects of the book. Unfortunately, they don’t get enough focus until the latter part of the story. This imbalance detracts from the overall narrative, as the main cast, who dominate much of the earlier sections, didn’t feel as engaging to me. I kept wanting to get back to Jubal and Gunter, which made parts of the book feel like a chore to get through.
One area where the book shines is in its portrayal of the killer’s story. The scenes depicting the murders are vividly detailed and disturbingly visceral. Heffernan does an excellent job of capturing the horror and intensity of these moments. However, the killer’s character becomes a bit too cartoonish during the climax, which diminishes the sense of dread that had been so effectively built up earlier in the story. This shift felt out of place and detracted from the overall tension.
Despite these flaws, *Blood Rose* isn’t without its merits. It’s a decent read if you’re looking for something to pass the time, but it doesn’t stand out as a must-read in the genre. I do think William Heffernan is an underrated author, as he clearly has talent for creating dark, atmospheric scenes and memorable secondary characters.
Overall, while I didn’t love this book I wouldn’t dismiss it entirely. It’s worth exploring if you’re a fan of crime fiction and want to check out Heffernan’s work, but it’s not a book I’d find myself revisiting or strongly recommending.