A very long messy, and ultimately unsatisfying pulp-sci-fi.
I started reading this because I wanted something interesting, entertaining, something with aliens, monsters a mystery and maybe a love story thrown in. Well, I got what I wanted, at least in the beginning. But then I realized that the facade is false. The first novel started very promising, but ended abruptly without any resolution. Yearning to find answers I then read the second one, and while it had plenty of plot events happening, still no resolution. In the third one, the focus shifted a little bit with new heroes and new storyline, but again - it ended up in the middle of the story and I had to read an extremely long fourth novel just to reach the end of this whole thing and realize that we, me, anyone reading this - will not get an answer to their burning questions. I can't say I was surprised, I already had serious doubts that Dan Simmons can bring his complicated story to a satisfactory end, the pattern in the first three novels of the series was quite obvious. He had some interesting elements - The Shrike, the Labyrinth worlds, the cruciforms, the mysteries surrounding the Time Tombs and he made a book out of it, but he had zero idea how to explain these elements and tie them together. I really hate such exploitative narrative, that relies on throwing mystery after mystery against the reader/viewer but without any way to explain it or conclude it. It's cheap, it exploits certain psychological traits of humans, it's bad writing. Dan Simmons can use words and his scenes aren’t boring, I'll give him that at least, but there is a serious lack of overall structure to this saga. As a writer he gets bored and gets stuck sometimes. His solution is to make a huge jump from one storyline and leap to something more interesting. What happened to the abandoned characters is maybe briefly summarized in a page from the perspective of other characters. This is also really annoying gimmick. Many villains do not get satisfactory end, we don't even know if they are dead. Important plot points are only briefly mentioned.
One of the worst things Dan Simmons does in this series is that he changes his mind about certain plot elements. For example: the ousters in the first book started as filthy smelly cruel rogue race of humans, almost space savages, who wouldn’t think twice to dismember their prisoners and still keep them alive, with the body parts spread on a table. They bombed Bresha into oblivion and massacred the locals, if anyone remembers this needlessly long plot element. Then at some point Dan Simmons decides that the ousters are now going to be an advanced race of nano-customized and genetically enhanced humans, very noble, very spiritual and forgiving. This 180 degree turn was so baffling. The same thing with the Shrike – he started as an unexplained demon who impaled people on a metallic tree for some reason and by the end he was turned into a faithful protector puppy sadly standing over the grave of one his former victims. Speaking of that, which is one of the many things that remained unexplained – what the hell was that all about? The entire pilgrimage of the first seven character ended so absurdly with literally some unexplained magic and abilities that one of the characters got and was able to defeat The Shrike. What happened to the tree? Was there a tree even? Why wasn’t the tree ver mentioned again? What happened to the hundreds of thousands of people lying connected through their heads in one of the tombs? Not a word about it.
What about the labyrinths? Who made them? Why were there so many dead human bodies packed in one of them? Dan Simmons again facing a mystery too hard to explain, simply doesn’t mention them anymore.
What happened to the Compassion element of the A.I from the future, which the Shrike was supposed to lure and destroy? Nothing. Loose threads abandoned by Dan Simmons as too hard to turn into something that makes sense.
One of the most annoying things about his writing is that while he skips important plot points, he would gladly invest serious amount of pages describing a hero simply moving from one planet to another and trudging through mud, or meticulously describe the landscape of some planet complete with names of peaks and cities, as if we can relate to them.
He also tends to use the annoying trope of someone failing to explain something simple with few simple words, just to keep the mystery “riveting”. This is not only annoying but also leads to the humorous situation where the reader can see something happening from ten miles away, but the main character looks extremely stupid. Speaking of stupid characters – lets talk about Raul Endymion. Lets talk about this stupid, extremely jealous, dumb oaf. It’s a rare situation when I’ve met such an unlikable character who was pushed to be a hero for some unknown reason. I didn’t like him from the first moment he appeared.
As for Aenea, she was a a very badly written female character. Only such badly written female character could swoon over such an unlikable character as Raul Endymion.
The ending was abrupt, unsatisfactory and frankly: boring. I spent so much time reading hoping to see the Technocore destroyed, yet it didn’t happen. Worst letdown since the ending of Game of thrones.
In conclusion, I really wanted all this to make sense in the end, but sadly it didn’t. Cheap thrills is all I got.