An essential read for students of sociology, environmental studies, urban studies, etc., but ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED for current stakeholders of the tech industry in Silicon Valley. There are a lot of truths exposed in this read that we have institutionally ignored and suppressed. It is refreshing to hear another perspective that does not portray the hype of technology "as the answer to the myriad economic and environmental challenges around the world" and discloses the few trade secrets made available. It is interesting to see how Silicon Valley was in its beginnings; now there is much less hard industry, but I would still be interested in how much of this applies to the present-day situation.
I honestly can't believe that some of the things I learned in this book wasn't already common knowledge. That Palo Alto has two Superfund sites, that Santa Clara County has the densest cluster of Superfund sites in the country that the USEPA has predicted will take 300 years to superficially clean up, prior connections between the military, economy, and Stanford, and the nature of the land of Moffet Field should be taught in sixth grade earth science classes, or at the very least in A.P. Environmental Science.
I could connect the concepts of this book to almost every concept I learned in my Environmental Sociology class last semester: treadmill of production, ecological modernization, environmental justice, environmental health, the HEP and NEP, science and manufactured doubt, environment as the place where citizens work, live, and play, etc. etc. The major point of contention is how the authors treat the behaviors of the original inhabitants of the land, the Ohlone tribe. Even the last paragraph of the text brings the concepts "full circle" by saying that the Ohlone knew how to use the local natural resources sustainably and held the land sacred, i.e. the ecologically noble savage paradigm. While I don't profoundly disagree with the author's points, I wonder how this could best be presented. I also saw a bit of the traditional women's environmental justice narrative when talking about women activists campaigning for better employment conditions and I wonder if the authors could have looked into that better to make fewer sweeping generalizations.
But other than that 4/5 stars.