There's a lot to be said about this kind of book, which is very intentionally and openly trying to be a bird's eye view of the political philosophy of a particular movement or thinker. As I see it, this book is an example of just what the pros and cons of that approach are.
First of all, this book is dense with assertions, but due to the nature of the pamphlets these selections are drawn from, they are largely not fleshed out but rather serve as support or evidence for the broader arguments being made about the nature of the nation-state, democracy, women's issues, etc. This should not be seen as an indicator of the flimsiness of Öcalan's theories, but a byproduct of the goals of the texts, which again, are to paint broad strokes and outline general lines and positions. Indeed, I've been promised that this book is so valuable within Öcalan's writings precisely because it is an accessible and friendly reference among otherwise very dense and wide-ranging pieces. That said, the speed at which Öcalan drops huge assertions in these texts one after the other can leave your head spinning, and certainly left me wanting to read his other work to get a better understanding of the foundational thinking undergirding these big ideas.
In general, I thought the first and fourth essays, on the Kurdish Question and the Democratic Nation, lent themselves better to the medium and were very digestible. I thought the middle two pieces, about Democratic Confederalism and Women's Revolution, the latter in particular, suffered a bit from the lack of expounding upon and drilling down into the issues at hand. Without the historical and material analysis that, to be fair, I believe is there in his larger works, Öcalan's claims about the nation-state, patriarchy, and above all women and men, can come off as essentializing or moralizing. In addition, while I have seen issues of sexuality and trans/non-binary people raised within the broader milieu of the KLM/Democratic Confederalism Movement (though never in much depth, that I've seen, maybe I've just missed it), their absence here is unfortunate, and made me wonder how much of the so-called inherent characteristics of men and women cited herein were representative of historically-attested realities (within the region if not elsewhere) or indeed just retroactive projections of the idealized conceptualizations of men and women that arose from capitalist modernity in the first place.
Overall, as is a theme in my reviews, my rating is based less on my initial impressions of this book and more on how it met what I believe to be its purpose. In the end, I felt like I wanted more and had more questions than answers, but as an introductory sketch of the thought propelling the KLM, one which would inspire readers to delve into the really meaty stuff, this book definitely does a good job.