The novel Geeks by Jon Katz depicting the lives of a young Jesse Dailey and his friend Eric presented not only the hopeful and promising story of two social outcasts but sheds light on what it’s like to not be a “mainstream” young adult in a society that provides an easier path for those who follow the social norms laid out for them without breaking stride. Not more than four pages into the prologue, the book draws readers in to its primary concepts and bigger picture ideas. Jon Katz opens his case study by directly disclosing “if you find yourself on the outside looking in… watching TV on weekends while everyone else goes to parties… you don’t have a lot of friends… the things you like aren’t the same things most other people like” (Katz XVII) then you may be someone who feels they are on the outside, a geek. It immediately allows the reader to resonate with these statements and more, already feeling understood by the book itself. The book reaches out to emphasize it’s understanding of how the reader feels, which in turn lets the reader be more open and willing to understand the book in return. Through this connection a more optimistic and connected outlook on the book is provided when the author introduced Jessie and Eric. Katz’s use of this direct speaking to the reader, even though Jesse’s life starting out at the beginning of the book doesn’t directly apply to everyone, it still aligns the reader’s mindset with his situation and life from Katz’s attention getter at the beginning of the book.
Although the book chronologically sticks to the biography, it does a wonderful job of drawing conclusions that apply to a more general group of people. A highlighted concept is the feeling of detachment geeks feel at school and in their community. Furthermore it concludes the level of displacement felt by these students is a spectrum, and ranges from simply feeling left out, and being mindlessly unincluded from parties and group activities, to bullying, harassment, and physical violence. The author makes a point to cement the idea that “the lucky ones” only face minimum discrimination: being left out of conversations, not having many (if any) friends, and feeling like they’re on the outside. He contrasts this idea with the other end of geek culture: name calling, getting shoved in the halls, essentially becoming a human punching bag both metaphorically and physically. Even though the basis of Katz’s portrayal of the others getting off easy is correct on the surface, the deeper understanding shows otherwise. He immediately dismisses those who aren’t put down by society to the extent Jesse and Eric were, stating other teens like them were lucky. Although the physical aspect of it is true and those who don’t get punched or tripped in the halls are grateful for it, their mental state remains about the same to those who do. By merely being on the outside of the “mainstream” group and watching from the sidelines it can make someone strongly feel they don’t fit in as much as those who get beat up. Katz does have the right to claim that overall those who were more polarized had it worse overall, but he was wrong in un-justifying those who went through similar but less intense forms of ostracization.
Although Katz tends to single in on a very specific culture within geeks, computer geeks, he still provides a sense of hope and encouragement for the future for any reader. A moral that can easily be pulled from the story is that if a door closes a window may still be open, you just have to find it. By chronologically presenting Jesse’s life, the reader can follow and assimilate with the ups and downs he faced as well, possibly similar to their own in pattern and structure. Therefore at the ending of the book, the reader is left feeling hopeful and excited for their own future, however cliche it may be. Geeks, taking place in the late 1990’s still feels very modern, and fits in any time period after the uprising of technology and computers. Despite having a sense of timelessness, it was published in the year 2000 and Jesse’s life continues on after. Feeling sickeningly inspired by the end of the book, I researched Jesse Dailey to see where he is today. As it turns out, Jesse was charged with at least two cases of sexual assault in 2013 against a 10 and 11 year old girl. After learning this, all of the previously created hope I had grasped dropped out of my hands and broke into hundreds of pieces. A person I had seen as a role model and someone to follow in the footsteps of, had become the scum of the Earth. This not only created my sense of previous false hope, but undermines the entire concept of the book. The book encompasses the idea that geeks are people too, their existence isn’t in the way of others, and it’s just a different way of life; the path less taken. By humanizing this path and these people, Katz tries to provide a better home for geeks within it. What Jesse did only 13 years later breaks that entire line, and undos everything Katz tried to do with his book. It creates a real slap in the face for the reader, as well as the author whose entire piece was ben broken. This illuminates another concept needed to be better known to people in the public eye, they represent a group, whoever that group may be, and their actions have consequences for everyone within that group. Jesse created yet another hit and negative finger to point towards the geek community since his case study was used to represent such a large group of people.
Jon Katz’s interpretation of Jesse Dailey’s transition from a teenager to young adult provides plenty of inspiration and promise for the future of high school students as well as other adult readers. But within the work it provides a deeper understanding of how geeks are different than others and what separates the different cultures. Through Jesse’s actions he breaks the foundation of understanding and acceptance the world had begun to have towards geeks. He brought an entire society of people back to square one, and although today it has less effect on the world, it drastically impacted the way the book is perceived. As a wise man once said, “pedophiles, they’re ruining it for everybody”.