I am really surprised this book got so many good ratings. I suppose people are caught up with the "twists and turns" and are not really concerned with the numerous holes and improbable, unrealistic situations. Unfortunately, I have to add spoilers to truly review this book.
Pros:
Yes--this book is unpredictable for the most part. I was not sure where the author was going. That is good and I think this must be what the ratings are based on. I finished the book, though I skimmed a lot of the last few chapters because I just wanted to see what happened. I was not concerned with actually reading the book. But I did finish the book, I did care about what happened.
Cons:
There are so many holes in this book, so many things that left me thinking...this is not realistic at all.
1) The kidnapping to begin with--Phoebe and Luke were at Phoebe's grandmother's house, and their son Tommy is a toddler and needs to roam around and the grandmother is not cool about that so they take him to the harbor where he can play on the playground/water there. This is where the kidnapper, who apparently has been planning this act, grabs him. How could the kidnapper have predicted this moment? This is not something Phoebe and Luke do every week, at the same time, same place. This is how most kidnappings occur--the perpetrator watches the victim for patterns and commits the crime during one of the victim's routine moments.
2) Luke, from elementary age, is the only boy with 4 female friends. Think about this. How common is this? I have never in my life heard of any boy at this age with only female friends. He has *no* male friends for all of his elementary, teen and young adult years. Only as an adult does he have one male friend and it's his business partner. This is completely unlikely.
3) Phoebe has such a keen sense of smell that she can receive a letter and smell the "coffee" aroma and know that the letter was written inside a coffee shop. She caught her husband cheating on her because he had come home from one of his secret meetings with his lover and she smelled the other woman's perfume. And yet he had been doing this for months--if she had had such a keen sense of smell, wouldn't she have noticed this after his first or second meeting with this woman? Especially since the woman is one of her best friends, someone she spends time with at least once a week?
4) The house called "29" where a murder was committed years ago because a teenager (!) took some power tools and cut a chunk of wooden stairs out and then supported the cut out part of the stairs with ladders, and then, when the person was on the stairs, she snuck down below and kicked the ladders away. Really? How heavy would that chunk of stairs have been? Think about how stairs are constructed--could a female teenager really have done all of this alone? This is what the book is claiming.
5) The house 29 again. It is apparently an abandoned house and the teens hang out there, smoke pot there, get drunk there, make out there. Okay. Maybe this happens often in Australia. I know it can happen in the US where there is an abandoned house and homeless people squat. But usually houses belong to someone and have property value. The neighborhood where this house is located was once not considered important but during the time (15 years!) that the house was abandoned, the area became re-gentrified and the old houses are torn down to make way for newer, fancier homes worth a lot of money. But the owner of this house does nothing with this house, and the house, despite being the site of a murder and having stairs that have collapsed, is allowed to exist in its dilapidated state--and the police had even done an investigation after the murder so it it not like this house is not on anyone's radar. Highly unlikely. And later we find that Bernice has fixed the part of the stairs that has collapsed? How does one woman do this alone? She has fixed it so that people can actually go up and down the stairs again.
6) The perpetrator kidnapped the kid and hid him at the top story of her house for *months* and her apparently smart teenager suspected something but did not really know. ???? Has anyone babysat a toddler before? Could you leave a toddler alone in a room for *one hour* without knowing that there is a young child in that room? This child was snatched from his mother--at almost 2 years of age. No screaming, no crying, no tantrums...not enough for the teen to realize without a shadow of a doubt that there is a child upstairs....for months. No way.
7) As the story unfolds, we learn that Phoebe is actually an alcoholic and has had numerous episodes where she binge drank and blacked out with memory loss *while caring for her toddler son*. This is before the kidnapping. She apparently had one violent drunken episode where she smashed all of her son's toys up. This is serious alcoholism. I can buy that her grandmother and mother in law love her enough to clean up afterwards and not tell her what happens--I suspect that it may be realistic that some loved ones will not only pick up the pieces for an alcoholic and maybe even hide the evidence of a drunken rage from the alcoholic. I guess that could happen. But ***there is a young child involved*** and the both grandmothers were aware that this child was in the care of an adult who had become drunk and violent. Both grandmothers cleaned up and kept the incident secret--and yet they claim to love their grandchild. Is this child abuse by neglect? In any case it is ridiculous behavior by supposedly responsible adults who claim to love their toddler grandchild.
8) The whole Bernice assault in 29. Really? Luke's father, who had never shown up in the house before and as far as we can tell, had no knowledge of 29, suddenly appears to rape a teen?
There are so many more holes but I will stop here. Let's just say that the author paid no attention to detail and did not ask if this could happen or that could happen.
There is also a stylistic issue that I had. This author is overly fond of participial phrases. I mean overly fond. There were at least 2 per page and the majority of them were not necessary and they interrupted the rhythm of the writing. I found this so distracting but I guess not so distracting that I could not read the book.
I did want to end on a more positive note. Congratulations to the author for having written a successful book--after all, I am in the minority here, as there is an overwhelming number of 4 and 5 star raving reviews here. I finished the book because honestly, up until the last quarter of the book, I was okay with the plot inconsistencies and character inconsistencies. However, the last quarter, the inconsistencies just became ridiculous and it was obvious that the author just inserted things for convenience. But...at least 3/4 of the book was decent.
I actually think, with the exception of the overflowing participial phrases, that the author has decent writing talent. I think she developed Luke and Phoebe decently, and I think she did a good job leading the reader one way and then another and keeping the reader guessing. I hope that in time, she can focus on detail and realistic situations and give us an actual literary piece instead of just a cheap thrill.