I am having a hard time deciding how to review Pulse by John Lutz because even though there were so many things wrong with it, I had a hard time putting it down, simply because I kept hoping Lutz would redeem himself and pull everything together in a way that made sense. Sadly, he didn't.
Lutz has attempted an extremely complex plot involving an elite private college, a high powered law firm, an eminent domain case and a serial killer. Frank Quinn and the team at Quinn & Associates are called in to handle a case of serial murders that are eerily like those committed by a serial killer called Daniel Danielle, who was reported killed during Hurricane Sophia in Florida.The action jumps back and forth in time between the present, Wisconsin in 1986 and Florida in 2002. It is hard to keep up with the present time frame because there is no real frame of reference-- we know it is summer because the students from Waycliffe College are dispersed to summer internships, but other than that, I was not able to tell if a woman was being murdered every day, every week, or with every full moon.
The storyline occurring in the current timeline jumps around, is just impossible to follow, and a lot of it seems to have absolutely no relevance. For instance, why do we care about the Police Commissioner's high priced call girl and the undercover vice squad cop who is sort of blackmailing the Commissioner about it? I certainly don't.
So here are some of the things that really bugged me about this: First: The Medical Examiner and his constantly inappropriate comments about the bodies of the victims. Yes, I am sure this is an attempt to give him some character, but it is beyond belief that a medical examiner would be able to make such statements in this day and age in New York City.
Second: Where in all this was the media? The book occasionally referred to newspaper stories about the murders, but isn't there any kind of continuity to the newspaper stories? A heightened sense of urgency and political pressure to have these crimes solved? Criticism against the commissioner for bringing in a private detective firm to investigate instead of using New York's finest? These gruesome murders of beautiful young women are occurring on a pretty regular basis and there appears to be no media or public outcry at all.
Third: I really didn't need the blow by blow description of what each victim felt as she was being tortured and murdered. Perhaps these descriptions were aimed at a group of readers who might get their jollies from them, but I didn't. Once was enough. More than enough.
Fourth: While I love to have everything tied up at the end with a neat little blow, I do not like to have info dumping and the entire plot unraveled in three or four paragraphs because the author was not clever enough to dribble things out in bits and pieces. This book consisted of scene after scene of grotesque murders that were committed in the same way over and over again, with Quinn and Associates pulling their hair in despair because the killer was too clever to leave any kind of evidence behind so each murder left them no closer to discovering the culprit than the one before. Suddenly because of one completely impossible break, Quinn and Company are able to get a questionable warrant and sneak into a privately owned building and eavesdrop on a private conversation, and then pursue a fleeing suspect who does not have an operable firearm, and shoot at him to kill. Uh-huh.
Fifth: I was so shocked when I read about the encrypted emails that had been exchanged by the two teenagers from Wisconsin in 1986, that I had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't mistaken. Then I had to go to the internet to verify that while there were email systems in existence in 1986, it was highly unlikely that they would be in use by two teenagers in Wisconsin. That just pretty much blew what little validity the book had for me. The fact that this was what broke the entire case wide open made it even worse.
Sixth: I still, despite the quick attempt to explain things at the end, do not know what the stupid book was about or why the first victim was murdered. Okay, I get who was doing the remaining killings and why, but I just don't get the legal shenanigans and other stuff that was supposedly the motive for the first murder. But granted, by the time I got to the point at the end where it was all being explained, I was pretty tired of the whole thing.
I'm giving it 2 stars because I did finish reading it, and I was interested enough in the plot to keep reading to find out how it all tied together. Unfortunately, even though Lutz tried to tie things up with a neat little bow, the ending unravels under even the lowest level of scrutiny.