What do you think?
Rate this book
Alexander The Great: A History From Beginning To End
★ Alexander the Great ★
What does it mean to be great? There have been many that have come through the sands of time proclaiming their own greatness. We see it in the news every day; leaders, heroes, tyrants, and even reality star presidential candidates claim that they are great. But what about Alexander the Great?
Inside you will read about...
✓ Alexander and the Happiness of Horses
✓ Aristotle and the First Day of School
✓ Philip’s Family Drama
✓ Enemies and Friends
✓ The Real Battle Begins
✓ Changing Tides
✓ Signs and Wonders
✓ In Pursuit of Darius
✓ Historical Autopsy
The young man from Macedonia that took the world by storm creating one of the world’s first major empires? He singlehandedly changed the course of history within a decade. Read along with us to figure out just what made Alexander so great.
What does it mean to be great? There have been many that have come through the sands of time proclaiming their own greatness. We see it in the news every day; leaders, heroes, tyrants, and even reality star presidential candidates claim that they are great. But what about Alexander the Great?
Inside you will read about...
✓ Alexander and the Happiness of Horses
✓ Aristotle and the First Day of School
✓ Philip’s Family Drama
✓ Enemies and Friends
✓ The Real Battle Begins
✓ Changing Tides
✓ Signs and Wonders
✓ In Pursuit of Darius
✓ Historical Autopsy
The young man from Macedonia that took the world by storm creating one of the world’s first major empires? He singlehandedly changed the course of history within a decade. Read along with us to figure out just what made Alexander so great.
38 pages, Kindle Edition
Published March 20, 2016
807 people are currently reading
765 people want to read
About the author
Henry Freeman
52 books89 followersHenry Freeman is an author and archaeologist. He has a passion for history and loves to travel the world exploring various historical sites.
Henry graduated from the University of Cambridge with a double major in History and Archaeology and shortly after that started his career as an archaeologist.
After traveling the world getting first-hand experience with history, Henry was determined to take up his dream of becoming a best-selling author.
He decided to partner up with the newly formed publishing company Hourly History writing short, concise and straightforward history books that never takes more than one hour to read.
Henry graduated from the University of Cambridge with a double major in History and Archaeology and shortly after that started his career as an archaeologist.
After traveling the world getting first-hand experience with history, Henry was determined to take up his dream of becoming a best-selling author.
He decided to partner up with the newly formed publishing company Hourly History writing short, concise and straightforward history books that never takes more than one hour to read.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 61 reviews
February 12, 2022
Its short & Sweet and to the point. I don't think a book about Alexander can be more elaborative than this. After all, all he did was poking his finger in other people's lives.
I've heard so much about him but I've never really sat down and checked him up from the beginning to the end. I don't think this book is designed to tell me every tiny thing about him but it was enough. Maybe I'll decide to read a bit more detailed thing but for now, this gave me more than enough.
Alexander was great in warfare. He mindfucked everyone and got whatever he wanted. For ten bloody years that was all he did. I think the only accomplishment in his life was the city of Alexandria. He had so much potential to do different and great things but he decided to drag a brilliant set of people across the lands to their deaths or depression. Yes he was great, we're still talking about him even if we don't know where his bones were buried. Imagine if he put his strength in something other than conquering.
Pretty good read for a lazy day when you don't know what to do with the few hours you have with no plans.
Book #14 of 2022.
I've heard so much about him but I've never really sat down and checked him up from the beginning to the end. I don't think this book is designed to tell me every tiny thing about him but it was enough. Maybe I'll decide to read a bit more detailed thing but for now, this gave me more than enough.
Alexander was great in warfare. He mindfucked everyone and got whatever he wanted. For ten bloody years that was all he did. I think the only accomplishment in his life was the city of Alexandria. He had so much potential to do different and great things but he decided to drag a brilliant set of people across the lands to their deaths or depression. Yes he was great, we're still talking about him even if we don't know where his bones were buried. Imagine if he put his strength in something other than conquering.
Pretty good read for a lazy day when you don't know what to do with the few hours you have with no plans.
Book #14 of 2022.
July 19, 2023
Different than other books about the man: Worth reading and learn
The book is different than most of the other books about Alexander. It is definitely worth reading and learn.
(Kindle Ed., pp. 1-2)
From an early age Alexander was a beloved child, but this didn’t mean that his parents were overprotective or especially doting. His father Philip made it clear from the beginning that he wanted his son to work hard and to achieve his right to his father’s throne through hardship and abstinence from luxury. Aiding Philip in his desire to harden his son was the wizened old veteran of his court, Leonidas, who drilled Alexander like a soldier from the first day he could walk.
The beau'/ bo'y was truly cared and loved with good teachers and mind'/ ment'ors hand-picked by his father.
(Ibid., p. 5)
The young Alexander, seeing a template for his own future exploits in the likes of Odysseus and Achilles, couldn’t get enough of this mythology. Although Aristotle would have preferred his student focus on subjects of government administration rather than epic tales of conquest, he didn’t discourage this interest, even going as far as to having a special copy of Homer’s work prepared for his student. This was no small feat in the days prior to the printing press since all books had to be laboriously copied by hand. Alexander appreciated it however, and it quickly became his most prized possession...
And a turn of events in his life, which pushed him to be the King of the World:
(Ibid., p. 8)
It soon became clear however that these bizarre charges were rooted in the fact that his father desired a new wife...
What a great lesson: Men, be aware of this truth. It is the only thing you must avoid when you are super successful and powerful.
(Ibid., p. 9)
...Several months went by with Philip and Alexander remaining in cold silence. Meanwhile, Philip and his new bride were vigorously attempting to create a new heir to the throne...
Just FYI, the Korean people, ex-cept/ -sauf/ -save idiots, remember the "Sonjoe-Goanghæ" case and how much the whole count-[u]r-y was screwed because of that.
(Ibid., p. 12)
...Whatever the case may be, it was Philip’s family drama that led to Alexander becoming king.
Wrong. Alexander would [h]ave become the King "without" his anger and hatred "if" his father hadn't caused the family drama.
His father raised him a strong, independent man from the beginning, and he would want to invade Persian Empire as originally planned by his father. But, his tragic death and all the misfortune fallen upon his future family and empire couldn't have happened if it hadn't been for the family drama his father had initiated.
After all, that ver'y family drama must have been the act'ual push for Alexander to put the daring plan into pr'actice.
(Ibid., pp. 13-14)
In this chaotic climate one would think that perhaps the young king would focus all of his efforts on internal affairs and attempt to put off any exterior conflict for a later date. Yet Alexander surprised everyone during this tumult by immediately setting his army marching to the south to take on the contentious army of Thessaly; the Thessalian force was blocking the road to Mount Olympus, bringing the further advance of the Macedonian military to a halt, and Alexander was determined to stop it. Alexander knew that it would be a suicidal charge if he sent his men out in a direct assault. No doubt taking some of Aristotle’s lessons in logic to heart, Alexander reasoned that if he couldn’t go through the garrison at Thessaly, then he would go around it. To do this, Alexander quickly commissioned a unit of engineers to build an alternative path on the far side of Mount Ossa. Due to this unexpected stroke of genius, the forces of Thessaly were caught completely off guard and before they could even process what was happening they were completely outflanked...
FYI, it was just like what King Damduk did! Read my book "Damduk, Alexander of the East,” and find out what I am talking about ;)
(Ibid., pp. 21-22)
Many more cities would fall before the Macedonians, many of them without a fight - as was the case with the “battle” for the city of Sardis, in which the Persian commander met Alexander’s forces outside the city walls and immediately offered to surrender. It is a bit unclear what the commander’s motives were, as he had the numbers and the supplies to hold off Alexander’s men long enough for more Persian reinforcements to arrive, but at any rate, a relieved Alexander accepted his bid for peace. Sardis proved to be a city full of riches. The gold stores of the town provided a much needed boost of morale to Alexander and his soldiers...
Maybe it wasn't just a sheer luck, but his early success at the Battle of Granicus, just like the fleeing King Sonjoe of Chosun after the Battle of Tangeumdae in 1592. Read my book “Adrmial Lee, Mentor of Human Race – Section A,” and find out what I’m talking about ;)
(Ibid., p. 22)
...After acquiring these resources, Alexander could for the first time pay his army for their services while also replenishing his own much depleted coffers...
And the different realities faced by the Macedonian forces there and Japanese forces at Hanseong (modern-day Seoul, Korea) in 1592. FYI, King Sonjoe and his cabinet just ran with their belongings leaving the ordinary "people" behind in en’emy hands.
I assume the true "greatness" of King Alexander is found right here in his following decision. He definitely shared this trait with King Damduk of Coree’o:
(Ibid., p. 25)
...Things seemed to be going very well for the Macedonian conquest, but while Alexander was busy subduing all of Asia Minor, General Memnon decided to take the fight straight to Macedonia itself. After occupying the strategic islands of Chios and Lesbos, he made overtures to disgruntled Spartans and Athenians declaring that if they sided with him he would overthrow their Macedonian overlords. To the horror of Alexander most of the Greeks met this news with unbridled enthusiasm, leaving the Macedonian King betrayed on the home front once again. This created a horrible dilemma for Alexander: if he dropped everything and ran back to Macedonia to stave off a Persian invasion he would lose everything he had gained in Asia Minor, and yet if he stayed away he risked losing the very heart of his kingdom.
(Ibid., p. 26)
...Yet fate, or “the gods” as Alexander probably believed, were smiling upon him on that day. By sheer chance, right before Menmon was to undertake the invasion, he fell ill and died. This struck a severe blow to any plans of invasion. His successor was inexperienced and unlike Menmon virtually unknown among the Greeks, causing them to become unsure of themselves and back out of their plans of treachery altogether. This was a definitive stroke of good luck for Alexander, and with the Persian invasion of Macedonia scrapped he was now free to finalize his conquest in the East.
With all these continuing fortunes on their side, the divine status of the leader Alexander must have become rock-solid among the Macedonian men pushing them to follow the man all the way to the mouth of India. Well, it was the "ancient" worl'd (mir'/ min'/ min'd) ;)
(Ibid., p. 30)
Emperor Darius couldn’t believe what was happening. He knew that the battle was lost, yet he would not surrender. He stood his ground while his own army was fleeing, standing boldly atop his chariot striking down anyone who approached. Alexander knew of course that the tide of battle had changed decisively in his favor; unable to resist the opportunity to strike this belligerent king down once and for all, he rushed headlong to meet Darius in battle. A few of Darius’s remaining cavalry saw this and attempted to come to their besieged leader’s aid. However, Alexander managed to cut through them all and met Darius head on. The brief skirmish that ensued resulted in Darius wounding Alexander in the thigh before escaping with the rest of his retreating army...
Sounds like King Darius III was a better man than many, many other leaders in history.
(Ibid., p. 34)
...Apparently hoping to grant his men the advantage that they had been denied in their previous engagement, Darius was determined to fight Alexander out in the open. This time, Alexander could not refuse his request.
Yes, the Battle of Gaugamela!
The book’s really fun to read. But, it's got so many errors to be edited.
(Kindle Ed., p. 2)
...Yet when the breeder introduced to them to his best horse, a beautiful black stallion called Bucephalas, its behavior left a lot to be desired despite the horse’s majestic appearance.
Correction: ...Yet when the breeder introduced them to his best horse, a beautiful black stallion called Bucephalas, its behavior made the steed the least desirable despite its majestic appearance.
(Ibid., p. 5)
...Always making a strong impression, what with his skinny legs, small eyes, stilted accent and flamboyant clothing, Aristotle could make Alexander laugh just as easily as he could produce thoughtful introspection.
Correction: ...Always making a strong impression, with his skinny legs, small eyes, stilted accent and flamboyant clothing, Aristotle could make Alexander laugh just as easily as he could produce thoughtful introspection.
(Ibid., p. 9)
...Alexander, who until very recently was the unquestioned heir apparent, was understandably furious, leaping out of his seat to hurl his cup at Attalus and asking the general if was calling him a bastard.
Correction: ...if he was calling the Prince a bastard.
(Ibid., p. 11)
...by purposefully throwing himself on the frontlines in battle, an effort that ultimately cost him is life...
Correction: ...by purposefully throwing himself on the frontlines in battle, an effort that ultimately cost him “his” life...
(Ibid., p. 24)
...The Macedonians however fared the better in these battles and the death toll was always slightly better on their end.
Correction: ...The Macedonians, however, fared better in these battles, and the death toll was always slightly “lower” on their end.
(Ibid., p. 29)
It is said that when Alexander led his men on the final charge against the Persians that they traveled at such a speed that they actually flew underneath the oncoming Persian arrows, arriving faster than the Persian archers could even take aim....
Correction: When Alexander led his men on the final charge against the Persians, it is said the Macedonians traveled at such a speed that they actually flew underneath the oncoming Persian arrows, arriving faster than the Persian archers could even take aim...
(Ibid., p. 32)
Egypt had lost its own national sovereignty years ago and even in Alexander’s time, the days of the mighty Pharaohs were long behind them. For the most part the Egyptians didn’t view Alexander with any more ire than they did the Persians or any other potential conqueror. However, Alexander was not quite like the rest; as his decisive victories began to stack up before him, he began to have his own delusions of grandeur.
Correction: Egypt “had lost" its sovereignty “since” long ago, and so, in Alexander’s time the days of the mighty Pharaohs were long behind them...
And the rest of the paragraph...what, is this a first draft? If not, what is wrong with the author's Ængl'ish?
(Ibid., p. 33)
...as the story goes, when he met the priest of the shrine he was greeted with the words, “O’ Paidon”. This was a traditional greeting used to any pilgrim, translated roughly as “Oh My Child,” but for some reason this priest had a bad lisp that day and mispronounced his proclamation. Instead, what Alexander hard was “O’ Pai Dios,” which to his ears translated to “Oh Child of God”.
Correction: ...what Alexander “heard” was...
(Ibid., p. 33)
Alexander, as superstitious as ever, took this as a clear sign that once and for all proved that he was without a doubt the son of a god...
There are many lines with the relative pronoun "that" overused.
Correction: Alexander, as superstitious as ever, took this as a clear sign that once and for all proved he was without a doubt the son of a god...
(Ibid., p. 34)
From the few men that were left alive long enough to be captured Alexander, had learned that the main wing of Darius’ army was stationed close by at the foothills of Nineveh, ready to strike Alexander in the open plains of the countryside...
Correction: From the few men that were left alive long enough to be captured, Alexander had learned that the main wing of Darius’ army was stationed close by at the foothills of Nineveh, ready to strike Alexander in the open plains of the countryside...
(Ibid., p. 36)
Greatly aiding him in this was the governor of the city of Mazaeus, who guessing that the days of Persian dominion in Mesopotamia were over, sided with Alexander as long as Alexander allowed him to continue his leadership of the city...
Correction: Greatly aiding him in this was the governor of the city of Mazaeus, who thought the days of Persian dominion in Mesopotamia were over. He would willingly side with Alexander as long as the new ruler allowed him to continue his leadership of the city...
(Ibid., p. 37)
...They eventually make it through to the great surprise of the Persians, attacking them from the rear while the rest of Alexander’s forces crashed the gates from the other side.
Correction: ...They eventually "made" it through...
(Ibid., p. 38)
...In the days following the demise of Darius, Alexander’s his men rolled through Persia like lightning, even cutting through swaths of northwestern India and making it the far eastern frontier of his empire...
Correction: ...In the days following the demise of Darius, Alexander and his men rolled through Persia like lightning, even cutting through swaths of northwestern India and making it the far eastern frontier of his empire...
(Ibid., p. 38)
...Although the Macedonian king had survived vast armies of opposition and multitudes of risk and danger during his lifetime, it would be a night of raucous drinking that would bring him to his knees. He had been a hard drinker most of us life...
Correction: ...He had been a hard drinker most of "his" life...
Despite all the rough English lines that disappoint some "serious" readers, the book earns a high “four-star” mark thanks to these amazing lines:
(Kindle Ed., p. 32)
It is said that at this point in his life that Alexander began to question whether or not King Philip was his father; he began to wonder instead whether he might actually be the son of a god. All of this sounds patently absurd to most of us today, but it was a common claim of many ancient kings of the past to assert that at least part of their parentage came from the heavens.
I have read countless books talking about the great conquest of King Alexander, but this one is the first and on-ly on[e] that ever talked about his real mot'ive and self-con-fid'ence necessary to execute the daring endeavor.
These special approach and ligh’t/ væç’/ faç’/ foc’us sufficiently compensate for the aforementioned errors.
Yes, the book still needs to be thoroughly revised and edited, yet, it is special with a gen-i-us foc’us trying to reach out to the characters' "ancient" mind'/ ment'ality that most of the readers today cannot easily process in our mod'ern mind'/ ment'ality.
Lastly, just a personal curiosity:
(Kindle Ed., p. 3)
His father King Philip is said to have wept for joy, and declared, “My son, you must seek out a kingdom equal to yourself—Macedonia is not big enough for you!” So it was that yet another happy milestone was reached in the Macedonian kingdom, and the beginning of Alexander’s coming of age was marked through the happiness of horses.
Was his ra’/ ro’y-al family one of these invaders from the northern Eurasian Steppe too? Despite all these, just like Hector of Troy, the Tamer of Horses, he would be defeated once. And he'd be defeated by those of his or’i-gin/ -gene, the Scythians, the Master Riders of the whole Eurasian Continent.
Once edited, the book will be an'other gre'at add'it-i'on to the world of our hæ-stor'y arch’ive.
The book is different than most of the other books about Alexander. It is definitely worth reading and learn.
(Kindle Ed., pp. 1-2)
From an early age Alexander was a beloved child, but this didn’t mean that his parents were overprotective or especially doting. His father Philip made it clear from the beginning that he wanted his son to work hard and to achieve his right to his father’s throne through hardship and abstinence from luxury. Aiding Philip in his desire to harden his son was the wizened old veteran of his court, Leonidas, who drilled Alexander like a soldier from the first day he could walk.
The beau'/ bo'y was truly cared and loved with good teachers and mind'/ ment'ors hand-picked by his father.
(Ibid., p. 5)
The young Alexander, seeing a template for his own future exploits in the likes of Odysseus and Achilles, couldn’t get enough of this mythology. Although Aristotle would have preferred his student focus on subjects of government administration rather than epic tales of conquest, he didn’t discourage this interest, even going as far as to having a special copy of Homer’s work prepared for his student. This was no small feat in the days prior to the printing press since all books had to be laboriously copied by hand. Alexander appreciated it however, and it quickly became his most prized possession...
And a turn of events in his life, which pushed him to be the King of the World:
(Ibid., p. 8)
It soon became clear however that these bizarre charges were rooted in the fact that his father desired a new wife...
What a great lesson: Men, be aware of this truth. It is the only thing you must avoid when you are super successful and powerful.
(Ibid., p. 9)
...Several months went by with Philip and Alexander remaining in cold silence. Meanwhile, Philip and his new bride were vigorously attempting to create a new heir to the throne...
Just FYI, the Korean people, ex-cept/ -sauf/ -save idiots, remember the "Sonjoe-Goanghæ" case and how much the whole count-[u]r-y was screwed because of that.
(Ibid., p. 12)
...Whatever the case may be, it was Philip’s family drama that led to Alexander becoming king.
Wrong. Alexander would [h]ave become the King "without" his anger and hatred "if" his father hadn't caused the family drama.
His father raised him a strong, independent man from the beginning, and he would want to invade Persian Empire as originally planned by his father. But, his tragic death and all the misfortune fallen upon his future family and empire couldn't have happened if it hadn't been for the family drama his father had initiated.
After all, that ver'y family drama must have been the act'ual push for Alexander to put the daring plan into pr'actice.
(Ibid., pp. 13-14)
In this chaotic climate one would think that perhaps the young king would focus all of his efforts on internal affairs and attempt to put off any exterior conflict for a later date. Yet Alexander surprised everyone during this tumult by immediately setting his army marching to the south to take on the contentious army of Thessaly; the Thessalian force was blocking the road to Mount Olympus, bringing the further advance of the Macedonian military to a halt, and Alexander was determined to stop it. Alexander knew that it would be a suicidal charge if he sent his men out in a direct assault. No doubt taking some of Aristotle’s lessons in logic to heart, Alexander reasoned that if he couldn’t go through the garrison at Thessaly, then he would go around it. To do this, Alexander quickly commissioned a unit of engineers to build an alternative path on the far side of Mount Ossa. Due to this unexpected stroke of genius, the forces of Thessaly were caught completely off guard and before they could even process what was happening they were completely outflanked...
FYI, it was just like what King Damduk did! Read my book "Damduk, Alexander of the East,” and find out what I am talking about ;)
(Ibid., pp. 21-22)
Many more cities would fall before the Macedonians, many of them without a fight - as was the case with the “battle” for the city of Sardis, in which the Persian commander met Alexander’s forces outside the city walls and immediately offered to surrender. It is a bit unclear what the commander’s motives were, as he had the numbers and the supplies to hold off Alexander’s men long enough for more Persian reinforcements to arrive, but at any rate, a relieved Alexander accepted his bid for peace. Sardis proved to be a city full of riches. The gold stores of the town provided a much needed boost of morale to Alexander and his soldiers...
Maybe it wasn't just a sheer luck, but his early success at the Battle of Granicus, just like the fleeing King Sonjoe of Chosun after the Battle of Tangeumdae in 1592. Read my book “Adrmial Lee, Mentor of Human Race – Section A,” and find out what I’m talking about ;)
(Ibid., p. 22)
...After acquiring these resources, Alexander could for the first time pay his army for their services while also replenishing his own much depleted coffers...
And the different realities faced by the Macedonian forces there and Japanese forces at Hanseong (modern-day Seoul, Korea) in 1592. FYI, King Sonjoe and his cabinet just ran with their belongings leaving the ordinary "people" behind in en’emy hands.
I assume the true "greatness" of King Alexander is found right here in his following decision. He definitely shared this trait with King Damduk of Coree’o:
(Ibid., p. 25)
...Things seemed to be going very well for the Macedonian conquest, but while Alexander was busy subduing all of Asia Minor, General Memnon decided to take the fight straight to Macedonia itself. After occupying the strategic islands of Chios and Lesbos, he made overtures to disgruntled Spartans and Athenians declaring that if they sided with him he would overthrow their Macedonian overlords. To the horror of Alexander most of the Greeks met this news with unbridled enthusiasm, leaving the Macedonian King betrayed on the home front once again. This created a horrible dilemma for Alexander: if he dropped everything and ran back to Macedonia to stave off a Persian invasion he would lose everything he had gained in Asia Minor, and yet if he stayed away he risked losing the very heart of his kingdom.
(Ibid., p. 26)
...Yet fate, or “the gods” as Alexander probably believed, were smiling upon him on that day. By sheer chance, right before Menmon was to undertake the invasion, he fell ill and died. This struck a severe blow to any plans of invasion. His successor was inexperienced and unlike Menmon virtually unknown among the Greeks, causing them to become unsure of themselves and back out of their plans of treachery altogether. This was a definitive stroke of good luck for Alexander, and with the Persian invasion of Macedonia scrapped he was now free to finalize his conquest in the East.
With all these continuing fortunes on their side, the divine status of the leader Alexander must have become rock-solid among the Macedonian men pushing them to follow the man all the way to the mouth of India. Well, it was the "ancient" worl'd (mir'/ min'/ min'd) ;)
(Ibid., p. 30)
Emperor Darius couldn’t believe what was happening. He knew that the battle was lost, yet he would not surrender. He stood his ground while his own army was fleeing, standing boldly atop his chariot striking down anyone who approached. Alexander knew of course that the tide of battle had changed decisively in his favor; unable to resist the opportunity to strike this belligerent king down once and for all, he rushed headlong to meet Darius in battle. A few of Darius’s remaining cavalry saw this and attempted to come to their besieged leader’s aid. However, Alexander managed to cut through them all and met Darius head on. The brief skirmish that ensued resulted in Darius wounding Alexander in the thigh before escaping with the rest of his retreating army...
Sounds like King Darius III was a better man than many, many other leaders in history.
(Ibid., p. 34)
...Apparently hoping to grant his men the advantage that they had been denied in their previous engagement, Darius was determined to fight Alexander out in the open. This time, Alexander could not refuse his request.
Yes, the Battle of Gaugamela!
The book’s really fun to read. But, it's got so many errors to be edited.
(Kindle Ed., p. 2)
...Yet when the breeder introduced to them to his best horse, a beautiful black stallion called Bucephalas, its behavior left a lot to be desired despite the horse’s majestic appearance.
Correction: ...Yet when the breeder introduced them to his best horse, a beautiful black stallion called Bucephalas, its behavior made the steed the least desirable despite its majestic appearance.
(Ibid., p. 5)
...Always making a strong impression, what with his skinny legs, small eyes, stilted accent and flamboyant clothing, Aristotle could make Alexander laugh just as easily as he could produce thoughtful introspection.
Correction: ...Always making a strong impression, with his skinny legs, small eyes, stilted accent and flamboyant clothing, Aristotle could make Alexander laugh just as easily as he could produce thoughtful introspection.
(Ibid., p. 9)
...Alexander, who until very recently was the unquestioned heir apparent, was understandably furious, leaping out of his seat to hurl his cup at Attalus and asking the general if was calling him a bastard.
Correction: ...if he was calling the Prince a bastard.
(Ibid., p. 11)
...by purposefully throwing himself on the frontlines in battle, an effort that ultimately cost him is life...
Correction: ...by purposefully throwing himself on the frontlines in battle, an effort that ultimately cost him “his” life...
(Ibid., p. 24)
...The Macedonians however fared the better in these battles and the death toll was always slightly better on their end.
Correction: ...The Macedonians, however, fared better in these battles, and the death toll was always slightly “lower” on their end.
(Ibid., p. 29)
It is said that when Alexander led his men on the final charge against the Persians that they traveled at such a speed that they actually flew underneath the oncoming Persian arrows, arriving faster than the Persian archers could even take aim....
Correction: When Alexander led his men on the final charge against the Persians, it is said the Macedonians traveled at such a speed that they actually flew underneath the oncoming Persian arrows, arriving faster than the Persian archers could even take aim...
(Ibid., p. 32)
Egypt had lost its own national sovereignty years ago and even in Alexander’s time, the days of the mighty Pharaohs were long behind them. For the most part the Egyptians didn’t view Alexander with any more ire than they did the Persians or any other potential conqueror. However, Alexander was not quite like the rest; as his decisive victories began to stack up before him, he began to have his own delusions of grandeur.
Correction: Egypt “had lost" its sovereignty “since” long ago, and so, in Alexander’s time the days of the mighty Pharaohs were long behind them...
And the rest of the paragraph...what, is this a first draft? If not, what is wrong with the author's Ængl'ish?
(Ibid., p. 33)
...as the story goes, when he met the priest of the shrine he was greeted with the words, “O’ Paidon”. This was a traditional greeting used to any pilgrim, translated roughly as “Oh My Child,” but for some reason this priest had a bad lisp that day and mispronounced his proclamation. Instead, what Alexander hard was “O’ Pai Dios,” which to his ears translated to “Oh Child of God”.
Correction: ...what Alexander “heard” was...
(Ibid., p. 33)
Alexander, as superstitious as ever, took this as a clear sign that once and for all proved that he was without a doubt the son of a god...
There are many lines with the relative pronoun "that" overused.
Correction: Alexander, as superstitious as ever, took this as a clear sign that once and for all proved he was without a doubt the son of a god...
(Ibid., p. 34)
From the few men that were left alive long enough to be captured Alexander, had learned that the main wing of Darius’ army was stationed close by at the foothills of Nineveh, ready to strike Alexander in the open plains of the countryside...
Correction: From the few men that were left alive long enough to be captured, Alexander had learned that the main wing of Darius’ army was stationed close by at the foothills of Nineveh, ready to strike Alexander in the open plains of the countryside...
(Ibid., p. 36)
Greatly aiding him in this was the governor of the city of Mazaeus, who guessing that the days of Persian dominion in Mesopotamia were over, sided with Alexander as long as Alexander allowed him to continue his leadership of the city...
Correction: Greatly aiding him in this was the governor of the city of Mazaeus, who thought the days of Persian dominion in Mesopotamia were over. He would willingly side with Alexander as long as the new ruler allowed him to continue his leadership of the city...
(Ibid., p. 37)
...They eventually make it through to the great surprise of the Persians, attacking them from the rear while the rest of Alexander’s forces crashed the gates from the other side.
Correction: ...They eventually "made" it through...
(Ibid., p. 38)
...In the days following the demise of Darius, Alexander’s his men rolled through Persia like lightning, even cutting through swaths of northwestern India and making it the far eastern frontier of his empire...
Correction: ...In the days following the demise of Darius, Alexander and his men rolled through Persia like lightning, even cutting through swaths of northwestern India and making it the far eastern frontier of his empire...
(Ibid., p. 38)
...Although the Macedonian king had survived vast armies of opposition and multitudes of risk and danger during his lifetime, it would be a night of raucous drinking that would bring him to his knees. He had been a hard drinker most of us life...
Correction: ...He had been a hard drinker most of "his" life...
Despite all the rough English lines that disappoint some "serious" readers, the book earns a high “four-star” mark thanks to these amazing lines:
(Kindle Ed., p. 32)
It is said that at this point in his life that Alexander began to question whether or not King Philip was his father; he began to wonder instead whether he might actually be the son of a god. All of this sounds patently absurd to most of us today, but it was a common claim of many ancient kings of the past to assert that at least part of their parentage came from the heavens.
I have read countless books talking about the great conquest of King Alexander, but this one is the first and on-ly on[e] that ever talked about his real mot'ive and self-con-fid'ence necessary to execute the daring endeavor.
These special approach and ligh’t/ væç’/ faç’/ foc’us sufficiently compensate for the aforementioned errors.
Yes, the book still needs to be thoroughly revised and edited, yet, it is special with a gen-i-us foc’us trying to reach out to the characters' "ancient" mind'/ ment'ality that most of the readers today cannot easily process in our mod'ern mind'/ ment'ality.
Lastly, just a personal curiosity:
(Kindle Ed., p. 3)
His father King Philip is said to have wept for joy, and declared, “My son, you must seek out a kingdom equal to yourself—Macedonia is not big enough for you!” So it was that yet another happy milestone was reached in the Macedonian kingdom, and the beginning of Alexander’s coming of age was marked through the happiness of horses.
Was his ra’/ ro’y-al family one of these invaders from the northern Eurasian Steppe too? Despite all these, just like Hector of Troy, the Tamer of Horses, he would be defeated once. And he'd be defeated by those of his or’i-gin/ -gene, the Scythians, the Master Riders of the whole Eurasian Continent.
Once edited, the book will be an'other gre'at add'it-i'on to the world of our hæ-stor'y arch’ive.
August 23, 2022
I like these short history books, I’ve read a few now. As with most of the others this is nicely told and a really good overview. We rattle through the entire life of Alexander the Great quite quickly but it’s a short book and so that is to be expected. Even so there is a decent level of detail for any beginner, like myself, who is interested and I felt like I learned a lot. This was a fascinating story.
I would recommend this book for anyone looking for a brief starting point on this subject.
A very decent 4+/5.
I would recommend this book for anyone looking for a brief starting point on this subject.
A very decent 4+/5.
April 18, 2016
I don’t like it when a historical book does not have any sources at the end, for me it’s just not right and loses credibility. It’s a pretty decent book, its perfect for someone that doesn’t know anything about Alexander the Great to get an idea of the man. It’s a pity that the author chose to devote a whole page reproducing Diodorus Siculus “stories” about Philip being involve with homosexual acts with Pausanias instead of devoting that page to say a few words about the Indian campaign and also the nautical adventure of Great Alexander’s General Nearchos which in my opinion has more interest and value as historical events.
Also something I must point out here, I am not saying they were not homosexual people in ancient Greece, they were, I mean 10% of the planet's male population and 2% of the female are approximately homosexuals, I am not denying that. What I am saying is to be more careful with expressions like “ the culture of Ancient Greece had no qualms with such relationships (meaning homosexual ones)”.
I am sorry but I will have to disagree with this. We have saved texts from the Ancient City Athens that proves that homosexuality was not something that was accepted, on the contrary they were strict laws which if someone was discovered to be a kinaidos which means someone that brings shame they were strip from their civil rights and exile from the city. The words homosexual was not used in ancient Greece at all.
The speech of Aeschines against Timarchus shows and proves that homosexuality in Ancient Athens was not something acceptable.
That’s what I wanted to say on the matter, general speaking is an easy going book and the fact that it takes less than an hour to read a real treat, especially in the busy times we live in.
Also something I must point out here, I am not saying they were not homosexual people in ancient Greece, they were, I mean 10% of the planet's male population and 2% of the female are approximately homosexuals, I am not denying that. What I am saying is to be more careful with expressions like “ the culture of Ancient Greece had no qualms with such relationships (meaning homosexual ones)”.
I am sorry but I will have to disagree with this. We have saved texts from the Ancient City Athens that proves that homosexuality was not something that was accepted, on the contrary they were strict laws which if someone was discovered to be a kinaidos which means someone that brings shame they were strip from their civil rights and exile from the city. The words homosexual was not used in ancient Greece at all.
The speech of Aeschines against Timarchus shows and proves that homosexuality in Ancient Athens was not something acceptable.
That’s what I wanted to say on the matter, general speaking is an easy going book and the fact that it takes less than an hour to read a real treat, especially in the busy times we live in.
October 3, 2021
Overview:
Horses were prized in Macedonia. As Alexander, son of King Philip II, was able to master and tame a wild horse that others could not, it became a sign of future greatness. Alexander was taught physical skills early on, along with intellectual ability. The tutor for the mind was an Athenian exile, Aristotle. Although with proven skill and gaining much favor from Philip, when Philip wanted a new wife with better lineage, Philip disowned Alexander. But this was not Philip’s sole mistake in relationships, of which many mistakes conspired to assassinate him. Leaving Alexander in charge. Rather than dealing with internal matters, Alexander took the army and conquered a large stretch of the world in a short time. Many areas chose to accept his rule rather than fight.
Geopolitics was important in Macedonia as local rulers had a lot of power and often tried to retain it or gain more. Alexander needed to either suppress the rebellions and manage them. During the conquests, Alexander earned the support of allies, and utilized impressive strategies during the battles.
Problems?
The focus is on the book is on how Alexander got his power. There is very little background information on Macedonia and the surrounding regions. Very little cultural references, and political contexts. A short biography that can help get a reader started in learning about Macedonia and Alexander the Great, but does not get very far in either.
Horses were prized in Macedonia. As Alexander, son of King Philip II, was able to master and tame a wild horse that others could not, it became a sign of future greatness. Alexander was taught physical skills early on, along with intellectual ability. The tutor for the mind was an Athenian exile, Aristotle. Although with proven skill and gaining much favor from Philip, when Philip wanted a new wife with better lineage, Philip disowned Alexander. But this was not Philip’s sole mistake in relationships, of which many mistakes conspired to assassinate him. Leaving Alexander in charge. Rather than dealing with internal matters, Alexander took the army and conquered a large stretch of the world in a short time. Many areas chose to accept his rule rather than fight.
Geopolitics was important in Macedonia as local rulers had a lot of power and often tried to retain it or gain more. Alexander needed to either suppress the rebellions and manage them. During the conquests, Alexander earned the support of allies, and utilized impressive strategies during the battles.
Problems?
The focus is on the book is on how Alexander got his power. There is very little background information on Macedonia and the surrounding regions. Very little cultural references, and political contexts. A short biography that can help get a reader started in learning about Macedonia and Alexander the Great, but does not get very far in either.
November 23, 2017
Another wonderfully written concise book on History. The author has given much information on Alexander and as well as about his father Philip and Alexander's tutor Aristotle. The book has vivid description on the war tactics used by Alexander.
A very good book and I like to recommend this to history buffs like me.
More about the review click the link below.
http://www.chromaring.com/2017/11/ale...
A very good book and I like to recommend this to history buffs like me.
More about the review click the link below.
http://www.chromaring.com/2017/11/ale...
October 19, 2022
I was hoping this would have more biographical information but was mostly a narrative of the battles he fought. Still interesting.
September 22, 2023
Entertaining and clear.
June 21, 2019
Another very well written offering from Hourly History. The brook brings forth the backdrop in which Alexander emerges from the shadows of his father who was himself a great leader. The conquests of the rest of the world and the final failure of Alexander in India have been presented in an interesting manner to keep the reader hooked.
February 17, 2022
Good book !
Very informative, learned a lot about Alexander the Great that didn't know !!
This author does a very good of making history understandable !!
Very informative, learned a lot about Alexander the Great that didn't know !!
This author does a very good of making history understandable !!
January 3, 2018
Solid overview of Alexander the Great's life
Get an idea of the man who never backed down from a challenge, - good chronology of his life and his great battles. A quick, lively read if you want an overview - good narrative structure. It's not a deep dive, and Alexander's lasting legacy is mentioned only at high level. Not a bad place to start to get the major events down in your head.
Get an idea of the man who never backed down from a challenge, - good chronology of his life and his great battles. A quick, lively read if you want an overview - good narrative structure. It's not a deep dive, and Alexander's lasting legacy is mentioned only at high level. Not a bad place to start to get the major events down in your head.
September 2, 2021
Worthwhile read
Nothing particularly new to me in the book side from Alexander and his father quarrels. A good short history book to read
Nothing particularly new to me in the book side from Alexander and his father quarrels. A good short history book to read
October 16, 2025
excellent historical reading
Alexander the Great: A Life from Beginning to End is a concise yet captivating look into one of the most legendary figures of the ancient world. Hourly History once again succeeds in its trademark style—delivering a fast-paced, informative narrative that covers centuries of history in under an hour of reading.
The book skillfully traces Alexander’s journey from his early education under Aristotle to his astonishing military campaigns that stretched from Greece to India. Despite its brevity, it manages to paint a vivid picture of the young Macedonian king’s ambition, brilliance, and flaws. The author balances storytelling with historical accuracy, explaining how Alexander’s bold strategies, charisma, and vision for a unified empire shaped the world long after his death.
What makes this short biography stand out is its clarity. The timeline is easy to follow, the language is accessible, and it avoids the dense academic tone found in many longer histories. Readers new to the subject will find it an excellent introduction, while history enthusiasts will appreciate how neatly it condenses major events—like the battles of Issus and Gaugamela—into engaging summaries.
While seasoned historians may wish for more depth or discussion of sources, the book never claims to be exhaustive. Instead, it succeeds perfectly at what it sets out to do: provide a brisk, insightful overview that inspires readers to learn more about Alexander and the world he changed.
In short: A compact, well-written biography that captures the essence of Alexander’s extraordinary life—ideal for anyone looking to understand his legacy without getting lost in academic detail.
Alexander the Great: A Life from Beginning to End is a concise yet captivating look into one of the most legendary figures of the ancient world. Hourly History once again succeeds in its trademark style—delivering a fast-paced, informative narrative that covers centuries of history in under an hour of reading.
The book skillfully traces Alexander’s journey from his early education under Aristotle to his astonishing military campaigns that stretched from Greece to India. Despite its brevity, it manages to paint a vivid picture of the young Macedonian king’s ambition, brilliance, and flaws. The author balances storytelling with historical accuracy, explaining how Alexander’s bold strategies, charisma, and vision for a unified empire shaped the world long after his death.
What makes this short biography stand out is its clarity. The timeline is easy to follow, the language is accessible, and it avoids the dense academic tone found in many longer histories. Readers new to the subject will find it an excellent introduction, while history enthusiasts will appreciate how neatly it condenses major events—like the battles of Issus and Gaugamela—into engaging summaries.
While seasoned historians may wish for more depth or discussion of sources, the book never claims to be exhaustive. Instead, it succeeds perfectly at what it sets out to do: provide a brisk, insightful overview that inspires readers to learn more about Alexander and the world he changed.
In short: A compact, well-written biography that captures the essence of Alexander’s extraordinary life—ideal for anyone looking to understand his legacy without getting lost in academic detail.
October 2, 2025
Barely functions as a biography.
What is included and what is not is super questionable.
Spends time on Alexander being tutored by Aristotle, yet glosses over Alexander’s fascination with Achilles (and Patroclus).
Olympias is mentioned more or less in passing—despite the huge influence she, and her beliefs and culture, had on Alexander’s worldview and life.
Zero mentions of Hephaestion, the love of Alexander’s life.
Zero mentions of Bagoas, Alexander’s side piece and second favorite.
Both of these exclusions are odd. The author clearly isn’t homophobic; he uses a fair amount of page time on Philip’s gay lovers—one in particular.
Wasting time on Tarsus and conquering the Persian Mint, while skimming over Issus and Gaugamela.
Nothing about Afghanistan. Half a sentence about India.
You can’t discuss Alexander in biographical terms and all but leave out his closest family member (mother, Olympias), the husband of his heart (Hephaestion), and his greatest military triumphs.
Heavy on typos and inaccuracies.
Although the Macedonian king had survived vast armies of opposition and multitudes of risk and danger during his lifetime, it would be a night of raucous drinking that would bring him to his knees.
This “theory” is dubious at best. Presenting it as fact is disingenuous.
Some of the childhood information is nice.
No sources listed. 💀
Wikipedia is a much more thorough and better read than…whatever this is.
What is included and what is not is super questionable.
Spends time on Alexander being tutored by Aristotle, yet glosses over Alexander’s fascination with Achilles (and Patroclus).
Olympias is mentioned more or less in passing—despite the huge influence she, and her beliefs and culture, had on Alexander’s worldview and life.
Zero mentions of Hephaestion, the love of Alexander’s life.
Zero mentions of Bagoas, Alexander’s side piece and second favorite.
Both of these exclusions are odd. The author clearly isn’t homophobic; he uses a fair amount of page time on Philip’s gay lovers—one in particular.
Wasting time on Tarsus and conquering the Persian Mint, while skimming over Issus and Gaugamela.
Nothing about Afghanistan. Half a sentence about India.
You can’t discuss Alexander in biographical terms and all but leave out his closest family member (mother, Olympias), the husband of his heart (Hephaestion), and his greatest military triumphs.
Heavy on typos and inaccuracies.
Although the Macedonian king had survived vast armies of opposition and multitudes of risk and danger during his lifetime, it would be a night of raucous drinking that would bring him to his knees.
This “theory” is dubious at best. Presenting it as fact is disingenuous.
Some of the childhood information is nice.
No sources listed. 💀
Wikipedia is a much more thorough and better read than…whatever this is.
February 20, 2022
I received this book free from Amazon and it is part of the Hourly history collection (https://hourlyhistory.com)
These books are mostly about historical events or historical persons.
This one is about Alexander the Great, one of the greatest conqueror in history and has all the important information about the remarkable man who Hellenized middle east, Persia and countries all the way to India, in a very concise way (you can read it within an hour). I would like little more interesting facts and moments from Alexander's life like cutting Gordian knot...
This is my assessment of this book Alexander the Great by Hourly history according to my 8 criteria:
1. Related to practice - 3 stars
2. It prevails important - 3 stars (it could contain some additional interesting facts).
3. I agree with the read - 4 stars
4. not difficult to read (as for non-English native) - 4 stars
5. Too long (more than 500 pages) - short and concise (150-200 pages) - 5 stars
6. Boring - every sentence is interesting - 4 stars
7. Learning opportunity - 3 stars
8. Dry and uninspired style of writing - Smooth style with humouristic and fun parts - 3 stars
Total 3.625 stars
These books are mostly about historical events or historical persons.
This one is about Alexander the Great, one of the greatest conqueror in history and has all the important information about the remarkable man who Hellenized middle east, Persia and countries all the way to India, in a very concise way (you can read it within an hour). I would like little more interesting facts and moments from Alexander's life like cutting Gordian knot...
This is my assessment of this book Alexander the Great by Hourly history according to my 8 criteria:
1. Related to practice - 3 stars
2. It prevails important - 3 stars (it could contain some additional interesting facts).
3. I agree with the read - 4 stars
4. not difficult to read (as for non-English native) - 4 stars
5. Too long (more than 500 pages) - short and concise (150-200 pages) - 5 stars
6. Boring - every sentence is interesting - 4 stars
7. Learning opportunity - 3 stars
8. Dry and uninspired style of writing - Smooth style with humouristic and fun parts - 3 stars
Total 3.625 stars
October 22, 2021
Great translation
Backstory:
Why I bought this book? I didn't receive the best education. I'm a high school graduate of a low performing public school. In the 5th grade, I heard of Alexander the Great in passing. I never studied about Alexander the Great at all whatsoever. I can see why. This is clearly a work of fiction, even if Alexander was a real person.
Fortunately, a YouTuber, who deleted their channel, explained that ancient kings enjoyed writing fictionalized versions of themselves.
That said, I think Henry Freeman did an excellent job translating this ancient tell and making it very engaging and fascinating. Hell, it's written better than some modern fiction. Henry did such an excellent job that I wouldn't mind reading more of his style of translating.
Backstory:
Why I bought this book? I didn't receive the best education. I'm a high school graduate of a low performing public school. In the 5th grade, I heard of Alexander the Great in passing. I never studied about Alexander the Great at all whatsoever. I can see why. This is clearly a work of fiction, even if Alexander was a real person.
Fortunately, a YouTuber, who deleted their channel, explained that ancient kings enjoyed writing fictionalized versions of themselves.
That said, I think Henry Freeman did an excellent job translating this ancient tell and making it very engaging and fascinating. Hell, it's written better than some modern fiction. Henry did such an excellent job that I wouldn't mind reading more of his style of translating.
September 17, 2022
"Alexander’s body was laid to rest in the Egyptian city of Alexandria. This city would be, by far, the most famous of all the Alexandrias which were founded during the Macedonians ten-year expansion through the known world. Alexandria would become a beacon of education, philosophy, and knowledge until the burning of the great library there."
The said great library was burned by Christians, which this book omits mentioning.
"When the Romans invaded Greece two hundred years after Alexander’s death, they absorbed Grecian culture into their own, as Alexander had done throughout his career. Thus the stories and legends of Alexander were spread further, carried by the Romans into the furthest corners of their empire."
The authors do not discuss similarities and differences between Alexander and, say, Attila the Hun, or Chingiz Khan.
August 4, 2021
Does what it says on the cover. Alexander in an hour.
The series of books are billed as concise and readable in around one hour, this title is exactly that. The book presents a very brief introduction to the life of Alexander in a similar depth to that of a 60 minute documentary.
It's great for someone who knows nothing about Alexander at all and will serve as a great overview but given its brevity the book relegates a number of key characters and events to passing references.
If you already know Alexanders story, pass on this one. If you don't, there's no harm in starting here. You won't become a professor of his life, but what do you expect from a 60 minute read!
The series of books are billed as concise and readable in around one hour, this title is exactly that. The book presents a very brief introduction to the life of Alexander in a similar depth to that of a 60 minute documentary.
It's great for someone who knows nothing about Alexander at all and will serve as a great overview but given its brevity the book relegates a number of key characters and events to passing references.
If you already know Alexanders story, pass on this one. If you don't, there's no harm in starting here. You won't become a professor of his life, but what do you expect from a 60 minute read!
June 5, 2022
If you want a very readable and simple snapshot, this book is good. However, it is a bare-bones synopsis with no references or footnotes. You just have to believe that what this guy tells you is true and correct.
This is not for you if you want to learn about Alexander the Great to any depth. You can get more information about him from Wikipedia that from this book. While that is not always a reliable resource in itself, it does provide references.
This is not for you if you want to learn about Alexander the Great to any depth. You can get more information about him from Wikipedia that from this book. While that is not always a reliable resource in itself, it does provide references.
January 19, 2018
Like the other 'A Life From Beginning to End', this biography of Alexander the Great is brief and to the point. It certainly presents an image that is truly inspiring. Alexander was passionate: his young heart was in everything he did; he was smart; a good problem solver. His energy was towering, and everyone around him saw it and wanted to follow him.
May 10, 2019
Easy read for the causal inquisitive mind
The author tells the story well. Captivating to the very end. I recommend this book to anyone who's interested in a quick tour of the life and exploits, Alexander the Great. This book is not boring with needless details. Adequate information that will satisfy the interest.
The author tells the story well. Captivating to the very end. I recommend this book to anyone who's interested in a quick tour of the life and exploits, Alexander the Great. This book is not boring with needless details. Adequate information that will satisfy the interest.
August 24, 2020
Excellent and concise.
A one hour history freebie. These books are great supplemental reading for college kids. The complaints that they are not they equal of larger works is nonsense, they are not supposed to be. Alexanders life and achievements happened quickly, fitting well into this format.
A one hour history freebie. These books are great supplemental reading for college kids. The complaints that they are not they equal of larger works is nonsense, they are not supposed to be. Alexanders life and achievements happened quickly, fitting well into this format.
May 2, 2022
Ho Hum
It was okay. How did this ebook sneak onto my tablet? I'm not really a fan of European Histories or any matters pertaining to religious or foreign enterprise or goings on. Infact, such topics keep me rather enlivided. Should the topic of Alexander the Great pops up in conversation, I will happily refer them to this book.
It was okay. How did this ebook sneak onto my tablet? I'm not really a fan of European Histories or any matters pertaining to religious or foreign enterprise or goings on. Infact, such topics keep me rather enlivided. Should the topic of Alexander the Great pops up in conversation, I will happily refer them to this book.
November 26, 2017
Alexander was Great
A young powerful leader who was a brilliant military strategist that was feared by all his enemies. He demanded and received loyalty from his troops and those he conquered. A short impressive live from centuries ago that is still remembered.
A young powerful leader who was a brilliant military strategist that was feared by all his enemies. He demanded and received loyalty from his troops and those he conquered. A short impressive live from centuries ago that is still remembered.
March 11, 2018
Wow ! That flew fast enough !
Written like a story it could have presented more facts. Analysis instead of downright praise would have benefited better.
However, in a shorter version this is a great read to have.
Written like a story it could have presented more facts. Analysis instead of downright praise would have benefited better.
However, in a shorter version this is a great read to have.
June 5, 2019
Kid with an attitude
It is a good short review of his military career but lacking in his personal life. He was a complex person. Although held in reverence in western cultures, Asian cultures thought of him more like Attila the Hun.
It is a good short review of his military career but lacking in his personal life. He was a complex person. Although held in reverence in western cultures, Asian cultures thought of him more like Attila the Hun.
January 22, 2020
Everything you need to know about Alexander the Great
I would recommend this to book anyone who wants to know about Alexander the Great.
It's neat and clean not too much of perplexed content. The author has written how much is needed to know about him.
I would recommend this to book anyone who wants to know about Alexander the Great.
It's neat and clean not too much of perplexed content. The author has written how much is needed to know about him.
January 29, 2021
It's another pretty decent one of these short little books. Packed with facts, it's about a 15 minute read when you don't get distracted like I do. Decent amount of info, but nothing super out there or new.
April 20, 2021
J Fernandes
A short summary of Alexander the Great’s life. Well written, it’s an easy-to-read introduction to the subject. It makes you ask for more, like an appetizer before a main meal :-)
A short summary of Alexander the Great’s life. Well written, it’s an easy-to-read introduction to the subject. It makes you ask for more, like an appetizer before a main meal :-)
September 4, 2021
Fascinating Biography
This is a compact but insightful biography of an amazing leader on and off the battlefield a giant among the ancients, a legend of history. Who is an object lesson in accomplishments and the price of ambition unchecked
This is a compact but insightful biography of an amazing leader on and off the battlefield a giant among the ancients, a legend of history. Who is an object lesson in accomplishments and the price of ambition unchecked
Displaying 1 - 30 of 61 reviews