Books can be attributed to "Anonymous" for several reasons:
* They are officially published under that name * They are traditional stories not attributed to a specific author * They are religious texts not generally attributed to a specific author
Books whose authorship is merely uncertain should be attributed to Unknown.
آن گاه که خداوند از پیامبران پیمان گرفت که هرگاه به شما کتاب و حکمتی دادم، سپس پیامبری نزدتان آمد و آن چه با شماست را تصدیق کرد، به او ایمان بیاورید و یاریاش کنید. آل عمران: ۸۱
پیامبرشناسی قرآن برای کسی که با آموزههای کلاسیک اسلامی بزرگ شده باشد، عجیب و غیرقابل فهم مینماید. بر خلاف سازوکار سرراست پیامبرشناسی کلاسیک اسلامی (وحی، معجزه) پیامبر قرآن مکرراً از معجزه آوردن اجتناب میکند، با این توضیح گیجکننده که «مگر من غیر از یک انسانم؟» (اسراء: ۹۳) در عوض از مخاطبان میخواهد به پیامبر ایمان بیاورند صرفاً چون گفتار او با گفتار پیامبران قبلی مطابقت دارد، و این را به پیمانی نسبت میدهد که نه در تورات و نه در انجیل یافت نمیشود. همچنین بارها در قرآن تأکید شده که پیامبر از مردم مزدی نمیطلبد و هر چه خواسته به خودشان داده (سبأ: ۴۷)، و همین به عنوان دلیل صدق او به شمار آمده و در مقابل کسانی که در مقابل وحی ادعایی خود پولی طلب میکنند، به عنوان پیامبران دروغین نفرین شدهاند. (بقره: ۷۹)
و اگر این پیامبرشناسی تا اینجا عجیب نیست، باید این را هم اضافه کرد که در نهایت پیامبر میگوید اگر من پیامبری دروغین باشم، گناهش به گردن خود من است و شما حق محکوم کردن مرا ندارید. (هود: ۳۵)
تمام این سازوکار در نظر ما که پیامبرشناسیمان تحت تأثیر آموزههای کلاسیک اسلامی شکل گرفته، نامفهوم و غریب مینماید و جز با توجیهات فراوان با تعالیم کلاسیک اسلامی سازگار نمیشود. اما دیشب در کمال شگفتی فهمیدم این پیامبرشناسی تا حد زیادی منطبق بر آموزههای دیداخه، دستورالعمل اخلاقی و آیینی کلیسا در قرنهای نخست مسیحی است. فصل یازدهم دیداخه تماماً به دستورالعمل مواجهه با پیامبران اختصاص یافته و شرط پذیرش پیامبر، نه آوردن معجزه، بلکه مطابقت آموزههایش با تعالیم مسیحیت عنوان شده. برعکس معجزه آوردن از دید دیداخه نشانهٔ دجال است که با کارهای عجیب و خارقالعاده میخواهد خود را پسر خدا و در نتیجه فراتر از انسان بنماید. مهمترین نشانهٔ پیامبر راستین، آن است که از مردم مزدی طلب نمیکند یا هر چه میطلبد به نیازمندان میدهد. در نهایت مسئولیت مردم آزمودن پیامبر نیست، بلکه باید بی آزمایش به او ایمان بیاورند. اگر پیامبر در واقع دروغگو باشد، مسئولیتی متوجه مردم نیست و خدا خود طرف حساب پیامبران دروغین است.
گزیدهٔ فصل یازدهم دیداخه: اگر کسی آمد و همه چیزهایی را که در بالا گفته شد به شما تعلیم داد وی را بپذیرید. اما اگر آن معلم برگشت و تعلیمی دیگر برای باطل کردن اینها داد به او گوش ندهید. هر رسولی را که نزدتان میآید مانند خداوند بپذیرید. و هیچ نبیای را که در روح سخن میگوید آزمایش نکنید و محکوم ننمایید. زیرا همهٔ گناهان آمرزیده میشود اما این گناه آمرزیده نمیشود. هر نبی که آنچه را تعلیم میدهد بدان عمل میکند، او را محکوم ننمایید، زیرا قضاوت وی با خداست، زیرا انبیای پیشین نیز چنین میکردند. اگر کسی بگوید به من پول و چیز دیگری بده، به او گوش ندهید. اما اگر بگوید که به نیازمندان دیگر داده شود، کسی او را محکوم نکند.
از فصل شانزدهم: در روزهای آخر انبیای دروغین و مفسدان زیاد خواهند شد. در آن زمان فریبندهٔ جهان [دجال] به عنوان پسر خدا ظاهر خواهد شد و آیات و معجزاتی انجام خواهد داد و زمین به دست او داده خواهد شد.
This book is probably our earliest writing, outside of the New Testament itself, of the teachings and tradition of the Early Christian Church.
In many ways --- in my opinion --- it reads almost as a summary of much of what is discussed by the Apostles in the New Testament. And, if so, I think that this makes sense. In the first and second centuries AD, the Church was very small and often operated underground due to the persecution and discrimination of the Roman authorities. As such, very few churches had a complete New Testament, much less a complete Bible. A book like "The Didache" --- brief, concise, comparatively easy to reproduce and publish in comparison with an entire Bible --- would make a good reference for ensuring that Christendom would largely remain similar and standardized in belief and practice, despite being scattered from Britain to Parthia and beyond and despite not having a complete set of scriptures to study and reference.
I'd heard anecdotally that The Didache contained specific guidance on how early Christians did worship and handled sacraments of baptism, Eucharist, weddings, and funerals. Unfortunately, I found none on either weddings or funerals. Regarding baptism, there is nothing in The Didache to suggest either that infant baptisms were or were not performed.
While this book was informative and did give me useful information on early Christian beliefs and worship, I can only give this edition 4 stars. Given its place in Christian history, I really think that work of this importance must have either have a preface in the beginning --- or some commentary within it to give readers a better understanding of it. Unfortunately, this edition has neither -- which would have been very helpful to readers.
I recommend this book for anyone desiring to learn more about Early Christianity and theology.
Extremely short document from the early church that exemplifies the importance of the gospel teachings of Christ to the church and provides interesting insight into early church rituals such as baptism, prayer, fasting, and the eucharist.
A must read. Writings of the early church are often ignored but highly needed for perspective on the solid doctrines of the faith that we often forget in our modern denominational squabbles. If doctrine is a tree, the modern church is in the leaves too often. We need to get back to the trunk and build from there.
Very interesting and short work dated to the first or early second century. Read this out of interest to explore early Church history and was surprised to find extensive quotations from the Gospel in it.
Like Clement’s epistle to the church at Corinth, The Didache is something everyone even slightly interested in Christian history ought to read. It takes only 20-30 minutes, though it’s not a bad idea to get a book with multiple translations and go through it a few times. It’s very likely this catechism-like document was written by either the first or second generation of Christians. It was well known in the early church but only rediscovered again in 1873. The early parts read like a fragmentary reconstruction of the Sermon on the Mount and other of Christ’s teachings in the Gospels. Later chapters deal with the proper observance of the sacraments and attitudes toward true and false ministers. Perhaps one of the most striking features of the document is the evidence here that a full-blown doctrine of the Trinity was already being applied in the earliest days of the church.
Fascinating. I took many, many notes on this as this letter touches on so many important areas of theology. This letter should be discussed more and its contents considered heavily in any church's statement of faith or Systematic Theology course in seminary.
Nothing provocative or life-changing. In fact, it seems the authors of the Didache simply cut and paste snippets taken from the New Testament and pasted them into this collection of customs, rules, and regulations. Perhaps this was intentionally done since most of the early church didn't have the full canon of Scripture in their possession at this time (2nd century AD). Nevertheless, I am glad I read this historical document that the early church utilized. A document that gave me a brief glimpse into how the early church operated and worshipped during a time of great persecution and upheaval.
Early Christian writings giving instructions to followers of Jesus. Very insightful to see how the earliest, probably first generation, followers of Jesus thought about following the Way of Christ.
I read this many years ago, probably in the 1990s when I first heard about it and was told that it offered proof that the earliest church believed in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. It is quick, easy read and should be a part of every Christian's required reading. Excellent!
From Amazon.com review: This is a wonderful approach to delivering a text of this type. It begins with the original language text (Greek) and is followed by 4 different English translations. The original and translations are all organized into chapter/verse in order to quickly cross reference one to another. This makes it ideal for the Greek student wishing to see how various scholars have translated a given text. Thus making this a solid text for the scholar or the student of Greek and provides keen insights as a snapshot of the early Church. The Didache has been dated in the range of 50-120CE making it one of the earliest documents surviving from the early Church. Some believe The Didache stemmed from an earlier Jewish catechetical work with additions from the earliest Christian tradition, quite possibly originating with the Apostles. All of this makes this an ideal work for understanding the early Church as it really was from a primary source - a systematic teaching tool of the first century. A must have for anyone interested in the early Church or koine Greek.
Best book from the early church that I have ever read.
Every Christian should read this book at least once in their lives for a well-listed set of Christian ethics. Covers everything from everyday guidelines to the method of baptism to the Eucharist to many of the heresies that we still see around us today (Jesus Onlyism, Prosperity Gospel, etc)
Concise, practical guide on the Christian Life. Written really early in the life of the Church (1st century). Includes the teachings of Jesus consolidated into one short document. Affirms the importance of Mass on Sundays and the Eucharist, as well as fasting and hospitality. My edition had some cool early hymns at the end.
Still holds up today. I was really interested in how there was a specific directive to pray the Our Father thrice a day. Then I thought about the way the Church prays the Liturgy of the hours, with an Our Father at Morning Prayer and at Evening Prayer. Add the one you might say at Daily Mass, and you’ve got all three!
This is an early example of Christian teachings and probably (not sure) the first text that explicitly prohibited abortion. Although this book is revered in Churches in the ancient traditions, it offers even to Free Church Protestants an example of Christian teaching in the time after the Twelve. Very short, readable in under 30 mins, recommended for Christians of all stripes.
A historical church document that would be worth reading frequently (especially since it only takes about 20 minutes!) for its practicality and affirmation of New Testament doctrine and prescription of Christian life.
::انطباع عام:: ++++++++ + يا للصفاء والجمال! + *** ::الكتاب:: +++++++ إنَّ كتاب «ديداخي» أو «تعليم الرسل» أو عنوانه الطويل «تعليم الرب للأمم بواسطة الرسل الاثني عشر» يقدِّم نظرة شاملة عن حياة الكنيسة في نهاية القرن الميلادي الأول وبداية القرن الميلادي الثاني. ويحتوي على أولى إرشادات المعمودية التي كانت تعطيها الكنيسة الأولى لطالبي المعمودية. ورغم أن هذا الكتاب غير مدرج ضمن كتب الإنجيل، إلاَّ أنه من كتب التراث المسيحي المفيدة جدًا للحياة الروحية. ويتكون من ستة عشر فصلاً.
يتألف النص، الذي تُشكل أجزاء منه أقدم كتاب تعليمي مكتوب موجود، من ثلاثة أقسام رئيسية تتناول الأخلاق المسيحية، وطقوسًا مثل المعمودية والقربان المقدس، وتنظيم الكنيسة. تصف الفصول الافتتاحية طريق الحياة الفاضل وطريق الموت الشرير. ويشمل الكتاب صلاة الرب كاملةً. تتم المعمودية بالتغطيس، أو بالسكب إذا لم يكن التغطيس عمليًا. يُفرض الصوم يومي الأربعاء والجمعة. *** ::مقتبس:: +++++++ "يوجد طريقان: طريق الحياة وطريق الموت. وشتَّانَ ما بينهما. فطريق الحياة كالآتي: أولاً، أحبب الله خالقك؛ وثانيًا، أحبب قريبك كنفسك. ولا تعامل غيرك بما لا تحب أن يعاملك به!
والآن، إليكم ما يعنيه هذا التعليم: باركوا لاعنيكم، وصلُّوا من أجل أعدائكم. وصوموا من أجل مضطهديكم، فأيُّ فضلٍ لكم إن أحببتم الذين يحبونكم؟ ألا تفعل الأمم ذلك؟ أمَّا أنتم فأَحِبُّوا مبغضيكم، فلا يكون لكم أعداء. وابتعدوا عن الشهوات الجسدية والدنيوية. ومَنْ لطمك على خدك الأيمن فحَوِّل له الآخر أيضًا، وستكون كاملاً. ومَنْ سخرك أن تمشي معه ميلاً واحدًا فامشِ معه ميلين. ومَنْ يأخذ ثوبك فأترك له الرداء أيضًا. ومَنْ يستحوذ على ما هو لك فلا تسأله أن يَرُدَّه، لأنك لا تستطيع على أيِّ حال. أمَّا مَنْ يسألك حاجة فأعطِه، ولا تطالبه أبدًا بأن يرُدَّها، لأن مشيئة الآب هي أن الجميع ينبغي أن يشارك بعضهم بعضًا في العطايا التي تلقيناها.
طوبى لِمَنْ يعطي حسب الوصية، لأنه ليس مُذنِبًا. والويل لِمَنْ يأخذ. أمَّا إذا أخذ أحد عن عَوَز فهو ليس مُذنِبًا بالتأكيد، غير أن الذي يأخذ عن غير عَوَز سوف يُحاسَب عن السبب والهدف اللذين من أجلهما أخذ. وسوف يوضع في السجن، ويجري تفحُّص عمله مَليًّا، ولن يُطلق سراحه حتى يُسلِّم آخر فلس. إلاَّ أنه قد قيل أيضًا حول هذا الموضوع: لِتَعْرَقْ في يدك الحَسَنة النابعة من محبة قلبك حتى تجد من هو أولى لتقديمها له." +.+.+.+.+.+
The English translation of this treatise is "The Teachings of the Twelve Apostles to the Nations." It is a First Century document whose author is unknown. In Acts 15, we read that the Apostles met at Jerusalem to discuss the issue of allowing Gentiles into the Church, and under what conditions that they can be admitted. In that text it states that the Apostles came to a decision and issued a letter with instructions to the Gentile converts. It would be wonderful to think that this work is that very letter. If so it would be very appropriate. It is a dramatic document that vividly portrays the challenges that Gentile Christians would face in the First Century Roman world.
The document begins dramatically with the admonition that there are two ways in life, the way of life and the way of death. Indeed, in the Roman world, the morality of the pagan world was in stark contrast to the way of Christ. To avoid the pitfalls of life in Roman cities, the Gentile converts are warned not to kill their children, neither before they are born nor afterward, and that they are to love their neighbor and honor the elders placed above them in the Church. In those days, the Christian stood out in stark contrast to his neighbors. And this, at a time when the Roman Empire actively persecuted Christians, meant that the convert would most likely be faced with the prospect of choosing between their Christian faith and their friends, their family, their business clients or even their lives. This document lays all of that out clearly.
Although this document was relatively unknown to the Western church before the Bishop of Constantinople made a gift of a copy of it to the British ambassador in the 1890s, its authenticity as a first century document is unmistakeable. This document is available for free in various places on the Internet in both Greek and English. I would highly recommend that Christians who want to know what life was like for Gentile Christians in the Apostolic Church should read this document.
This is a very well put-together book. A few things I like about it:
1) Facing Greek text with English translation. 2) Lots of footnotes for references. 3) About 50 pages of commentary on context, meaning, interpretation, language, role, etc of the Didache for the community in which it was found.
If you want to learn about the Didache, then I would recommend this book.
I think I finished this book, I was pretty familiar with the teaching so it kind of was underwhelming to me a bit, but there was a phrase in it I loved, “Count all things that happen to you as good, knowing that nothing comes except by God.”