This book purports to provide to the reader, "...for the first time... the full portrait of the man who was Hitler's second in command..." Goering was certainly the subject of previous books, in part or in whole, but this volume, written in the mid-1970s benefits (at least in theory) from nearly three decades of interviews, scholarship, and the declassification of documents following the central subject's demise in a Nuremberg prison cell from cyanide. The author certainly paints a vivid and historically complete picture of Goering, although this is hardly what could be described as a scholarly account. (The endnotes, for example, are invariably vague and fail to cite many precise references.) What Mosley attempts to do in painting this portrait is to present Hermann Goering as a formidable bundle of positive potential which, somehow, was stymied by the fundamental moral failure of devoting himself, slavishly, to what began as a hero worship of Adolph Hitler and ended with a deeply reluctant commitment to the vows, both public and private, which left him duty-bound to see the Nazi leader's purposes through to the bitter end. Indeed, it is clear that Goering foresaw the demise of the Third Reich well in advance of Hitler's capitulation (i.e., suicide) in the spring of 1945. Yet due to his sense of duty, even in the face of Hitler's direct hostility towards him in later years, Goering complied with the Nazi leader's will in the worst cases, or turned a blind eye in the best cases. And in any case, he forfeited countless opportunities to change the course of history for the better, dating all the way back to the 1930s and Hitler's initial rise to power. Where Mosley takes a wrong turn, in my opinion, is to paint Hermann Goering's story as the tragedy of a great man whose potential was squandered by, in effect, betting on the losing side and then doubling down over and over again.
As someone who lost family in the Holocaust, Mosley's portrait is far too forgiving. I am, admittedly, incapable of reading the biography of a figure such as Goering without my own subjectivity creeping in, but I think given the scope of the atrocities committed by the Nazis (sadly not unique, as some will claim), I have earned the right, by blood, to criticize the work of Mosley and those like him. All too often when reading this book, the author's admiration for Hermann Goering is clearly evident, and all too infrequently does he condemn the inhuman atrocities of which his subject was guilty. There is an imbalance in this portrait, and it reveals more about the author than it does about Goering. (A brief scan of the author's bibliography also helps to elucidate Mosley's rather transparent predilections.) For example, while Mosley reports that those around Goering were critical of his lavishness, his avarice, his foppish manners, and his pretensions, Mosley himself seems undisturbed by any of it, and the tone which comes through is more one of admiration than ridicule or admonishment.
On the other hand, Mosley personally interviewed many of the principals involved in Goering's life, was an eye witness to many of the events described, and, although lackadaisical about documenting it, certainly did his homework with regard to digging down into the available documentation. Thus, what emerges is a portrait of Goering strewn liberally with lines which it is up to the reader to read between. On the whole, the perceptive reader should be able to tease many essential and enlightening facts about Goering's life from the sticky wad of thinly-veiled hero worship which Mosley presents.