A topic that's underrepresented gets a good survey in this work. All the major aspects are covered: politics, patriotism, labor and the war industry, perceptions of the enemy, influence of women and minorities, the economy, entertainment, rationing.
It's also interesting that since the book is over fifty years old now, there's a double historical perspective. For example, when he discusses gas rationing, it's an echo of the 1973 and 1979 OPEC oil crises, which still lay in the future in 1970.
Everything's fair game here, including the multitude of government agencies directing the war effort that were often working at cross-purposes, leading to plenty of red tape and inefficiency. At the same time, the black market threw plenty of wrenches into the government machinery. I don't agree, though, that a tradesperson keeping back his best or only stock for loyal customers (of cuts of meat, shoes, or other items subject to rationing) was implicitly part of the black market.
It's natural to favor your friends, and a good business practice as well. Referring again to the gas crises of the '70s, most station owners took care of their regular customers. I can't see the logic, for example, in not allowing people to trade ration cards or points. After all, the ration itself doesn't change if you use it instead of me.
The most interesting topics for me are the war's effects on news, entertainment and sports. Ernie Pyle's story is fascinating; seeing people at their best, in ways or acts that the person probably never imagined they were cut out for. Even the baseball and football adjustments not only made for a unique couple of seasons, but also showing how eagerly sought ways to keep up their morale.
I understand that in a wide-ranging book that spans so many topics that some repetition is inevitable, There's a few pages, though, where an event or notable person's mentioned three times; that would make sense if the point is developed, but not to just repeat the same information. On the other hand, there's a few transitions that leave me wondering if he's referring to the previous topic, or introducing a new one.
I admit those complaints are minor, and overall this is a good read on a relatively neglected story.
...