I read this in 2005, and wrote a note on it. Going through my old blogs, I found the note. And I thought: so this is who I was ~20 years ago.
And now you know too. Here you go, from August 2005.
......................................................
Strange surroundings. A flight gets cancelled, and the passengers are stranded at a rather nondescript and shabby airport in the middle of nowhere, a place described as "a back-corridor between two worlds". A few passengers are holed into nearby hotels and guest-houses.... and left behind to spend the night at the airport are 13 people. Huddled together, still in the mode for a crib or two, they decide on an innovative way to spend the night. They would tell stories, one story each, to the group. Everybody, true enough, must have a story to tell.
So there you are. An innovative concept, borrowing from the age-old method of story-telling to a crowd around a fire, and there you have 'Tokyo Cancelled', the book. Thirteen stories, from Lagos to Delhi, from Tokyo to New York, from Paris to unnamed, unknown lands, about a Japanese entrepreneur who has a crazy love (a fetish infact) for a life-size doll, about Robert de Niro's illegitimate son and Martin Scorsese and Isabella Rossellini's love-daughter, and about the exceptionally lucky Chinese ear-cleaner (which is one of my favourites), and an immortal in the middle of a smallpox outbreak (Ouch, that sounded like the back cover of the book itself ! ). Different, varied in texture and in size, tracking the most basic traits of man, the most basic virtues and the most basic flaws, some overtly fantastic to others which are much tacitly so, interesting reads they all are. One word of warning though. The stories being heavily philosophical ones in the garb of easy read, if one intends a quick scan, this is not the preferred choice. And easy read does not mean easy understanding (well, it often might not mean any understanding at all), so get yourself ready for the book before you pick it up.
Back to the book, a trend that one gets to notice in most of the stories is that of the protagonist being thrown in the midst of change that comes about in the surroundings. Some of these changes are pre-meditated, some sudden and astonishing, but all leave the protagonist grappling with the changed reality, and sometimes failing, but more often accepting the changed present as it is.
Among the stories, the one that touched me the most was the smallest one. About two-and-a-half pages, it tells the tale of this ageing couple and their two children. The anxieties and distaste for the father of their children's wanton, wild ways. And then a disaster. And then... life goes on. And one wouldn't complain and crib, but ensure that the same calamity does not befall the rest of the world.
Right after I had finished with Tokyo Cancelled, I had started off with the long delayed read of Haroun and the sea of stories. And reading Haroun, I would accept the reviews of Tokyo Cancelled's style. Dasgupta's style IS very similar to Rushdie's. Not quite the Rushdie of Midnight's Children (which I found confusing, meandering, a little self-obsessed yet creative and ... umm, intelligent. I have not been able to make up my mind as to whether intelligent is a good or a bad thing for a book), though. Tokyo Cancelled is possibly a little too intelligent for its own good.
For all Dasgupta's undoubted storytelling abilities, while reading the book, I did often have the feeling of walking into a glass wall. The stories are a little too intelligent, a little too fantastic to touch the common reader. At the risk of comparing, Midnight's Children did never give that feeling. Convoluted and weird, it yet did appeal to the heart. It did yet touch the heart. The philosophy in Tokyo Cancelled is distant, opaque and difficult... and indeed it is specifically that point which makes for a compelling second read. I know that Dasgupta would have wanted his reader to think, and thanks to him for that. But would he have really wanted his reader to think, and think some more, and not get it, and since she did not get it, proclaim the book as a masterpiece. C'mon now! That was the intention of the "Art" movement of the '80's in Hindi cinema. And that did not succeed, did it? And no movement, indeed no piece of art can really claim to have succeeded if it does not reach out to the people who are consumers of the art. And I could only wonder at what an amazing book this could have been had it been rid of the uber-fantasy lather. Especially because it is such a riveting read.