Tom Mulcair’s memoir appears at the beginning of the longest Canadian federal election campaign in recent history. This is both its strength and its weakness. It is in fact two books, one quite good, the other inevitable and ordinary.
One cannot help comparing it with Justin Trudeau’s autobiography, which revealed a great deal about the impact of an unusual and very public childhood. Mulcair tells the story of a very different background which shaped his character and beliefs. Both books are the genuine voices of their authors (albeit with assistance). Stephen Harper is not likely ever to write anything as revealing as either book. His minions will be on the lookout for attack ad fodder, as they have done, relentlessly, with Trudeau.
Mulcair recounts his childhood, in a large family, which his father worked courageously to support. On his French-Canadian mother’s side he is descended from the legendary Honoré Mercier, and he is named after his father’s brother who was killed in the Second World War. From the description of his childhood, his admiration for his parents, his courtship and marriage, and his relationship with his own children, family values for Mulcair are not a mere slogan.
We learn of the profound influence of his teacher Father Cox, a truly remarkable social activist, his admiration for Claude Ryan, and his engagement as a federalist in the debates over the future of Quebec. As someone who had to fight his way up, Mulcair was energetic, ambitious, and formidably intelligent, achieving positions of responsibility at a very young age. He displays courage, willingness to take risks rather than compromise his ideals, and a certain propensity to play hardball all the time, something he has had to learn to control. He does not let political differences get in the way of personal friendship with people he admires.
Unfortunately, as the story proceeds into his political career, first as a Quebec MNA and cabinet minister, then as disciple of and successor to Jack Layton, it becomes increasingly two-dimensional. Mulcair’s prose is terse, measured, clear, and to the point, but somehow lacks passion – no risk of sounding like Angry Tom.
The latter part of the book is really an election manifesto, carefully crafted to showcase the positions and values of the NDP, link them to Mulcair’s past and his record, and avoid or parry the inevitable attacks. This will be useful for many readers who want to know more about the party and its platform. Those who want more substance and less spin will regret the limitations this imposes.
Nonetheless, the book tells us much that we need to know about the man who would be prime minister. It is both welcome and essential reading.