I have always been dead set against burning books... this book might make me rethink that position
After around 200 pages I finally just had to set this one down. I've finished a number of bad books, but this is the worst book I have read in a long long time. I mean that.
In the first four pages LaHaye essentially undermines all pastors by planting seeds of doubt in the readers regarding their pastor's seminary training. He insinuates that the reason there is disagreement with his position on prophecy is because the seminaries have been infiltrated by people who do not believe the bible, therefore YOUR pastor (if he is not a pre-prib premilennialist) has been corrupted by the system. Of course this opens the door for him to cram 350 pages of garbage into your brain and your pastor who is likely more adept in the scripture than Mr. LaHaye is conveniently taken out of the equation.
I used to be a big fan of LaHaye and the 'Left Behind' school of prophecy, and I can attest first hand that the proponents of this school of thought are constantly driving a wedge into churches on the issue of prophecy. I was part of that wedge for a brief time. Of course when you hold to this "left behind" ideology you quickly think it is the most important issue in the church, and if you question the rapture or it's nearness you are some how against Christ. The progression of this thinking leads many believers looking to Glenn Beck as though he is a prophet of sorts. (Not speaking for or against Glenn here, but let me say there are much better places to go for theology than to him.)
Unfortunately, a number of readers will not read this book critically and will give the author a free pass on his statements. This book is filled with imaginative ideas regarding historical events and how they relate to prophecy. While the author claims to be a literalist taking the text at face value, he does nothing of the sort, and if you read it honestly you will quickly see that. His treatment of Ezekiel is probably the most horrific.
For those who give this book a high rating, read something else outside of the pre-trib premil camp. Try Riddlebarger's 'A Case for Amilennialism', or even Doug Wilson's "Heaven Misplaced" for a view on Postmilennialism. You quickly find both Amil and Postmil to be biblically tenable, and even if you disagree with the Amil or Postmil perspective you will at least be forced to look at some of the glaring errors in LaHaye's work.
This book is pure sensationalism. Again if you read critically you will see that he uses every trick of propaganda available. I constantly read things like "All prophecy scholars agree that.... x" or "Every respectable student of the bible believes.... x" Instead of developing his line of thinking, he merely appeals to "all, or every" when a careful study of the history of interpretation of Revelation will show that historically LaHaye stands in a small minority. Essentially everyone who agrees with him is in his mind "respectable" and all "respectable" theologians agree with him. Circular.
For those who reviewed this book and considered it 'well-written' and
'cogent' I simply ask, in comparison to what? I suppose it's more intellectually stimulating that "Curious George"... nah, I take that back.
I could go on an on. This book is trash. My library is full of books I disagree with but have great respect for. I find it healthy to read books that oppose my theology and oppose it well. This book does nothing of the sort and I am throwing it away, I would feel horrible if somebody else wastes their time with it because I chose not to trash it.
Sorry, that was more of a rant than a review, and probably way over the top. Moreover I know this review falls into the same sensationalism I accuse the book of... but hey this is a review, and nobody paid to read it.