Believe it or not, most of the ideas expressed here could be qualified as "non-denominational". Just read it.
I grew up in a family that had an odd mix of religions but was, for the most part, non-practicing. I was given my choice on whether or not to continue attending church (practicing an organized religion) when I was 10 and, well, the lake and my friends called every day....I used to have a complex about it until a very wise friend, whom I respect and admire very much, pointed out that she did indeed consider me to be a very spiritual person, and that not practicing an organized religion does not exclude one from being so. Some may say that that makes me complacent, but I like to think otherwise.
This has been on my shelves for a couple of years now, and I'm choosing to read it now because some people in my immediate world, as my friend R would say, "need Jesus". His Holiness was a friend of Senator Pell, who had Parkinson's. Shortly before he passed away, His Holiness came to Newport. It was sort of understood that it was to say goodbye, so when our president got him to speak for us, we were happy that the family would "share" his time here with the public. Tickets had to be limited, and all of a sudden, people you hadn't heard from in a while surfaced to see whether or not you were using your extra ticket, or did you know anyone who wasn't using theirs? Had we had room on the lawn, we could have filled fifteen of those tents or more. The wind was coming off the water, and if we were cold, I can only imagine that he was freezing, but it was the most delightful afternoon. Most of the speech centered around the teachings in this book, but I do remember a personal story that he told. It was refreshing to hear that yes, even the Dalai Lama gets frustrated and angry sometimes, even if that story came all the way back from his childhood (darn that parrot!) I have a photograph of him as he left the tent, because he zeroed in on one of the nuns, who was quite elderly at the time, and went over to greet her.
But back to the book. As I said, one could take the teachings on compassion and spirituality in the most open of senses; the ideas are presented in a clear and accessible way, easy analogies, and I would qualify most of it, outside of the ideas on reincarnation, as humanist. Only at the end, when he delves into the use of meditation as a means of reaching the enlightened state, do the teachings start to become more Buddhist in nature.
There are things happening in my world that test me right now, and I found the teachings helpful. I almost gave it a four, because I'm still missing what one does when what they want involves the obliteration of what will bring you peace and happiness. In other words, when that person at work sets out to make your life difficult, not for their own benefit, but just to make your life difficult, what happens? What happens when the other person's target is merely your sense of peace? What happens when one country decides to invade another? Is passive avoidance always the answer? However, these lectures address not only the reactive--what happens when you're attacked/bothered/annoyed, etc, but also an active reaching out to those who would disturb your sense of peace. A "proactive" prayer for those people, if you will, but not in a condescending sense.
However, I decided to give it five stars because on my ratings system, five means "I'll be reading this again." And I will. Probably every day for the next 5 months, hopefully not the next three years and 5 months!