In this book, the renowned author Ved Mehta brings Gandhi to life in all his holiness and humanness, shedding light on his principles and his purposes, his ideas and his actions. Through interviewing disciples of Gandhi in five countries, Mehta reconstructs in precise detail Gandhi's daily routine, recounts the story of his life, and presents the beliefs and practices of his "apostles." Mehta's book, widely praised when it was first published in 1977, is a biographical portrait of Gandhi unlike any other. "A remarkable examination of the life and work of a human being who has been extolled around the world as one of the greatest souls of all time. . . . A very readable account, dotted with sharply etched portraits."-Paul Johnson, New York Times "Meticulously researched, passionately felt, elegantly written."-Max Lerner "Mehta's work . . . touches much more than the personality of Gandhi, for it deals with the more general issue of the evolution and maintenance of a cultural symbol. . . . Mehta has given us a sensitive view of India and a personalized experience of the meaning of Mahatma Gandhi."-Edward S. Kayes, American Historical Review "An outstanding book . . . aglow with illuminating detail."-John Grigg, The Listener
Ved Mehta takes you along the intellectually perplexing path of making Gandhi a saint, a prophet at some moments, while at others, he makes him the most idiosyncratic character of his time. At one point, Mehta analyses the psychology of Gandhi from Freudian perspective, and through the words of the interviewees, declares him an abnormal person whose sexuality has remained repressed in the earlier days of his life. However, towards the end of his treatise, he depicts Gandhi and his mission the most extraordinary happening in the modern Indian history. More so, Gandhi's mission, particularly the one pertaining to alleviation of poverty and dismal sanitation problems, is highly demanding and tested the commitment of many 'brahmacharis'; but despite his devotion, very few have succeeded and followed the essence of what 'Gandhism' was actually trying to convey.
This is a historically significant book that began as a series of articles in the New Yorker. It caused a major furore in India when first published, even prompting a chaotic shouting match in parliament, where there were calls to ban it for defaming the "father of the nation". Were they justified? I had to find out.
What I found is a book of big virtues and big flaws. It is undeniably a brilliant piece of writing. Mehta was a master of the "New Yorker profile" style: you visit someone in their milieu, describe it vividly, chat with them intimately for hours, distil the chat into a few unguarded and revealing quotations, and arrange everything into a sardonic, wryly amusing portrait. Here some major Gandhians get the New Yorker treatment.
They make a rather tragicomic group, it has to be said. The India of the early 1970s, under Indira Gandhi (no relation), memorialised the Mahatma obsessively while trashing his principles and values. Gandhi would have wanted his followers out in the streets protesting, not curating Gandhi museums. In a sequence of portraits rich with pathos and sometimes quite heartrending, Mehta captures the inaction and weakness of will of the self-styled custodians of Gandhi's legacy. This is juxtaposed with an account of Gandhi's own restless action and strength of will, to powerful effect.
However, the critique relies on extreme selectivity. JP Narayan, JB Kripalani and Morarji Desai were anything but inactive. They don't remotely fit Mehta's narrative, so they are either omitted entirely or mentioned only briefly. Mehta's thesis fits some prominent members of Gandhi's circle, but as a broader generalization it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
And the book is at its most irritating when trying to stir up scandal. Mehta guarantees attention by making some huge claims about Gandhi's private behaviour. Mehta's Gandhi struggles to respect the boundaries of women. Indeed, he takes advantage of the power he holds over them. These are shocking claims but no solid evidence is provided to back them up. Mehta's contemporary critics were probably right to be angry about this. We shouldn't ban this kind of journalism, but we should expect better.
One of the good biography book. The details of Gandhi's life and his fights for humanity, India's country, religion, and his doctrine about Satyagraha, non-violence fights. It's all mentioned really detail in this book. And also his fights in South Africa. This book tells a lot about Mahatma Gandhi and after I read this book, he's really inspired me with his non-violence fights.
This book came out in 1977 and it was controversial then.There were calls to ban the book. The book is an honest appraisal of the legacy of Gandhi some 25 years after the great man's death. Mehta interviews many of Gandhi's surviving disciples and they turn out to be curious bunch. There is a vast gap between Gandhian theory and its practice. What made the book controversial is Mehta's close probing of Gandhi's infamous brahmacharya experiments towards the end of his life. It also contains a biography of Gandhi drawn more or less from Gandhi's own version of his life. Mehta's prose is silky smooth and the book is extremely readable some 40 years after it was first published. Certainly deserves to be more widely read.
Buku yang ngasih tahu pembacanya sisi lain Gandhi. Ternyata dia nggak sesuci yang digambarkan biografi lain tentang dia. Ved cerita klo ternyata Asram gandhi tu nggak benar-benar mandiri. Mereka masih membutuhkan donatur. Dan tiga donatur terbesar gandhi adalah kapitalis. Trus buku ini juga cerita tentang ritual Gandhi untuk ngetes kekuatan selibatnya.