Drive critical, engaged historical learning. Helping learners more deeply understand historical concepts, the student-centred approach of this new Course Book enables broader, big picture understanding. Developed directly with the IB and fully supporting the new syllabus for first examination 2017, the clear, structured format helps you logically and easily progress through the new course content.- Cover the new syllabus in the right level of depth, with rich, thorough subject content- Developed directly the with IB, with the most comprehensive support for the new syllabus- Truly engage learners with topical, relevant material that convincingly connects learning with the modern, global world- Streamline your planning , with a clear and thorough structure helping you logically progress through the syllabus- Decipher source evaluation , refine and progress analytical thinking and fully embed vital Paper 1 skills, strengthening exam performance- Integrate Approaches to learning with ATLs like thinking, communication, research and social skills built directly into learning- Help learners think critically about improving performance with extensive examiner insight and samples based on the latest exam format- Build an advanced level, thematic understanding with fully integrated Global Contexts, Key Concepts and TOK- Also available as an Online Course Book
Librarian Note: There are several authors in the GoodReads database with this name. This profile will contain more than one author. Those listed below have multiple books listed on GoodReads.
Important but not very interesting nor complex. I find that racism is often uninteresting to read about because there isn’t really any ambiguity regarding who is wrong and who is right.
one of the worst textbooks i have ever had the displeasure of studying with unfortunately. the info was NOT chronological which is the bane of my history existence and was split up in honestly the weirdest ways possible. the civil rights sections should have been broken up into SO MANY MORE PARTS which would have made studying way more enjoyable by breaking up the info. also spelling mistakes? really? my sister was rejected from oxford but maybe they should have accepted her because she can write a hell of a lot better than the people at the university press smh