What do you think?
Rate this book
Win a free print copy of this book!
4 days and 21:22:16
15 copies available
U.S. only
Dissection of a Murder
Not yet published
Expected 7 May 26Win a free print copy of this book!
4 days and 21:22:16
15 copies available
U.S. only
'So gripping, so clever, so good. This brilliant book had me hooked from the beginning' – Alice Feeney, author of Beautiful Ugly
Breathlessly compulsive courtroom drama with expertly-crafted twists that you won't see coming, Dissection of a Murder is the razor-sharp debut novel from Jo Murray.
A dead judge. A silent defendant. And a courtroom full of liars.
When Leila Reynolds is handed her first murder case, she’s shocked at how high-profile it the murder of a well-respected, well-known judge. This shouldn’t be the kind of case she’s leading; it’s way beyond her expertise. But the defendant, Jack Millman, is clear. He wants her, and only her.
To make things worse, he’s refusing to talk. How is she supposed to prove herself on what appears to be an unwinnable case?
Losing is not an option. She must find the most persuasive argument. Trials aren’t won by convincing judges or fellow barristers – they’re all about convincing a jury.
Suddenly, Leila finds herself fighting not only to keep Jack out of prison, but also to keep her own secrets buried.
It’s true what they say – there are two sides to every story.
Guilty or not guilty?
You decide . . .
PRAISE FOR DISSECTION OF A MURDER:
'Absolutely outstanding' – TM Logan, author of The Mother
'What a terrific read!' – Sarah Vaughan, author of Anatomy of a Scandal
'Utterly compelling' – John Marrs, author of The Family Experiment
Breathlessly compulsive courtroom drama with expertly-crafted twists that you won't see coming, Dissection of a Murder is the razor-sharp debut novel from Jo Murray.
A dead judge. A silent defendant. And a courtroom full of liars.
When Leila Reynolds is handed her first murder case, she’s shocked at how high-profile it the murder of a well-respected, well-known judge. This shouldn’t be the kind of case she’s leading; it’s way beyond her expertise. But the defendant, Jack Millman, is clear. He wants her, and only her.
To make things worse, he’s refusing to talk. How is she supposed to prove herself on what appears to be an unwinnable case?
Losing is not an option. She must find the most persuasive argument. Trials aren’t won by convincing judges or fellow barristers – they’re all about convincing a jury.
Suddenly, Leila finds herself fighting not only to keep Jack out of prison, but also to keep her own secrets buried.
It’s true what they say – there are two sides to every story.
Guilty or not guilty?
You decide . . .
PRAISE FOR DISSECTION OF A MURDER:
'Absolutely outstanding' – TM Logan, author of The Mother
'What a terrific read!' – Sarah Vaughan, author of Anatomy of a Scandal
'Utterly compelling' – John Marrs, author of The Family Experiment
Kindle Edition
Expected publication May 7, 2026
20587 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 104 reviews
February 10, 2026
My fellow bookworms… may I?
Can I officially introduce the best legal thriller of 2026?
🥁 Drum roll, please… 🥁
The crown goes to Dissection of a Murder by Jo Murray.
From the very first page, I fell hard for Jo Murray’s razor-sharp writing style. The second I finished, I immediately started searching for her backlist—scrolling, refreshing, scrolling again—only to realize this was her first novel. And yes… I actually screamed. Because I need more Jo Murray thrillers in my life, immediately. She is now on my auto-approved author list, and I will read anything she writes next without even checking the blurb.
A dream for legal-thriller lovers
And here’s the fun twist:
The upcoming Presumed Innocent Season 2 adaptation is already rumored to be spectacular—but I genuinely believe this story may top it.
Yes, I’ll miss Jake Gyllenhaal terribly… but with Rachel Brosnahan, Matthew Rhys, and Courtney B. Vance joining the cast, this adaptation is already screaming Emmy bait.
Rachel as Leila Reynolds? Absolute perfection. Tell me she won’t eat that role alive.
But first—let’s give this novel the standing ovation it deserves.
What makes Dissection of a Murder so addictive?
This book has everything I want in a legal thriller:
⚖️ Sharp courtroom tension
🧩 A layered mystery
🔥 High emotional stakes
👀 Dual timelines and perspectives
🕵️ A chilling, anonymous watcher
The story unfolds through Leila Reynolds and the mysterious Witness X, whose intersecting narratives blend past and present in a way that never lets you relax.
Leila learned the law from her husband and mentor, Julian—a legendary attorney who shaped her career and pushed her to the top, even helping secure her place in the Legal 500. Their relationship is built on ambition, loyalty, and shared victories… until everything cracks.
Five years earlier, Leila defended Jack Miller, a man wrongfully convicted and imprisoned for two years. Now, Jack is accused of murdering Judge Anton Smythe—the very man who once sentenced him, while Jack’s foster mother was dying of cancer.
And Jack requests only one lawyer: Leila.
The problem?
Leila has never handled a criminal murder case.
And the prosecutor?
Her own husband.
Julian plays to win. And this time, he has no intention of letting Leila save her client.
A shadow watching from the dark…
As the case grows darker, a terrifying presence emerges.
Someone is watching Leila and Julian’s home.
Someone sends Julian a cryptic birthday gift.
Someone stalks Leila, trolls her online, and knows far too much.
Who is Witness X?
What are they hiding?
And how are they connected to Jack, the judge, and Leila’s past?
Every clue is a thread—and when they finally connect, the truth is more disturbing than anything Leila is ready to face.
“Nothing is ever black and white—especially when it comes to the law.”
Final Verdict
This novel is fast, relentless, and impossible to put down.
You will:
bite off your perfectly manicured nails,
forget to blink,
and gasp at every twist.
By the end, you’ll need a spa day to recover from the stress—and it will be completely worth it.
This isn’t just a five-star book.
This is sky-full-of-stars, whole-planet-level brilliant.
The best thriller I’ve read in years.
I laughed like Villanelle at the end—shocked, thrilled, and already desperate for more.
📚 Go get your copy.
I already ordered mine for a future reread.
Endless thanks to NetGalley and Dutton for sharing this absolute MASTERPIECE in exchange for my honest thoughts.
I truly appreciate it.
medium.com
instagram
facebook
twitter
Can I officially introduce the best legal thriller of 2026?
🥁 Drum roll, please… 🥁
The crown goes to Dissection of a Murder by Jo Murray.
From the very first page, I fell hard for Jo Murray’s razor-sharp writing style. The second I finished, I immediately started searching for her backlist—scrolling, refreshing, scrolling again—only to realize this was her first novel. And yes… I actually screamed. Because I need more Jo Murray thrillers in my life, immediately. She is now on my auto-approved author list, and I will read anything she writes next without even checking the blurb.
A dream for legal-thriller lovers
And here’s the fun twist:
The upcoming Presumed Innocent Season 2 adaptation is already rumored to be spectacular—but I genuinely believe this story may top it.
Yes, I’ll miss Jake Gyllenhaal terribly… but with Rachel Brosnahan, Matthew Rhys, and Courtney B. Vance joining the cast, this adaptation is already screaming Emmy bait.
Rachel as Leila Reynolds? Absolute perfection. Tell me she won’t eat that role alive.
But first—let’s give this novel the standing ovation it deserves.
What makes Dissection of a Murder so addictive?
This book has everything I want in a legal thriller:
⚖️ Sharp courtroom tension
🧩 A layered mystery
🔥 High emotional stakes
👀 Dual timelines and perspectives
🕵️ A chilling, anonymous watcher
The story unfolds through Leila Reynolds and the mysterious Witness X, whose intersecting narratives blend past and present in a way that never lets you relax.
Leila learned the law from her husband and mentor, Julian—a legendary attorney who shaped her career and pushed her to the top, even helping secure her place in the Legal 500. Their relationship is built on ambition, loyalty, and shared victories… until everything cracks.
Five years earlier, Leila defended Jack Miller, a man wrongfully convicted and imprisoned for two years. Now, Jack is accused of murdering Judge Anton Smythe—the very man who once sentenced him, while Jack’s foster mother was dying of cancer.
And Jack requests only one lawyer: Leila.
The problem?
Leila has never handled a criminal murder case.
And the prosecutor?
Her own husband.
Julian plays to win. And this time, he has no intention of letting Leila save her client.
A shadow watching from the dark…
As the case grows darker, a terrifying presence emerges.
Someone is watching Leila and Julian’s home.
Someone sends Julian a cryptic birthday gift.
Someone stalks Leila, trolls her online, and knows far too much.
Who is Witness X?
What are they hiding?
And how are they connected to Jack, the judge, and Leila’s past?
Every clue is a thread—and when they finally connect, the truth is more disturbing than anything Leila is ready to face.
“Nothing is ever black and white—especially when it comes to the law.”
Final Verdict
This novel is fast, relentless, and impossible to put down.
You will:
bite off your perfectly manicured nails,
forget to blink,
and gasp at every twist.
By the end, you’ll need a spa day to recover from the stress—and it will be completely worth it.
This isn’t just a five-star book.
This is sky-full-of-stars, whole-planet-level brilliant.
The best thriller I’ve read in years.
I laughed like Villanelle at the end—shocked, thrilled, and already desperate for more.
📚 Go get your copy.
I already ordered mine for a future reread.
Endless thanks to NetGalley and Dutton for sharing this absolute MASTERPIECE in exchange for my honest thoughts.
I truly appreciate it.
medium.com
December 27, 2025
What is justice? It probably means different things to different people. Will Judge Anton Smythe, 56, get justice for his murder? Is the tale of the prosecutor, Julian Kesler, tells at trial the true version of events or does the defence lawyer Leila Reynolds put across a robustly different interpretation that may lead to a not guilty verdict for Jack Millman? What is Jack’s definition of justice? This indeed is a dissection of a murder, but remember, don’t trust anyone, especially the lawyers.
Oh my goodness, where to start with this one, perhaps with I reluctantly put it down when real life intrudes. There are so many layers involved in this very definition of a legal thriller that makes it such a clever novel. The dynamics are off the charts, between Julian and Leila, Leila and the characters in Chambers, Leila and Jack and so on with excellent characterisation into the bargain. Leila is especially fascinating as to whether she’s likeable, you decide. There’s so much misogyny directed at Leila my blood boils. The least said about Julian the better but I’d love to wipe that arrogant smirk of his smooth veneer. There are some side characters and I become desperate to know what the story is there and the identity of one of the points of view is a tantalising puzzle.
The author creates an escalating air of threat and menace, a watchfulness that gives prickles at the back of the neck. There’s twist upon twist, whiplash like, making it a terrific thriller as I genuinely have no idea what’s going to implode/explode next. Add in the legal element and that makes it big winner for me.
What of the trial? It’s electric, riveting and totally enthralling. It’s suspenseful, tense and very dramatic and I’ll say no more as this is one courtroom thriller that begs to be read.
Overall, it’s very clever and creative, it’s well written and perfectly paced with several points of view which works so well, building the suspense and a pile of questions. It’s a cracker of a book which praise be, has a really good conclusion.
With thanks to NetGalley and especially to Pan Macmillan for the much appreciated early copy in return for an honest review.
Oh my goodness, where to start with this one, perhaps with I reluctantly put it down when real life intrudes. There are so many layers involved in this very definition of a legal thriller that makes it such a clever novel. The dynamics are off the charts, between Julian and Leila, Leila and the characters in Chambers, Leila and Jack and so on with excellent characterisation into the bargain. Leila is especially fascinating as to whether she’s likeable, you decide. There’s so much misogyny directed at Leila my blood boils. The least said about Julian the better but I’d love to wipe that arrogant smirk of his smooth veneer. There are some side characters and I become desperate to know what the story is there and the identity of one of the points of view is a tantalising puzzle.
The author creates an escalating air of threat and menace, a watchfulness that gives prickles at the back of the neck. There’s twist upon twist, whiplash like, making it a terrific thriller as I genuinely have no idea what’s going to implode/explode next. Add in the legal element and that makes it big winner for me.
What of the trial? It’s electric, riveting and totally enthralling. It’s suspenseful, tense and very dramatic and I’ll say no more as this is one courtroom thriller that begs to be read.
Overall, it’s very clever and creative, it’s well written and perfectly paced with several points of view which works so well, building the suspense and a pile of questions. It’s a cracker of a book which praise be, has a really good conclusion.
With thanks to NetGalley and especially to Pan Macmillan for the much appreciated early copy in return for an honest review.
September 13, 2025
My Rating: 5⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Oooh I loved this… twists and reveals done right!!!
A dead Judge.
A silent defendant.
And a courtroom full of liars!!
When Leila Reynolds is handed her first murder case, she’s shocked at how high-profile it is, its the murder of a well respected judge.
This shouldn’t be the kind of case shes leading, its way beyond her expertise. But the defendant, Jack Millman, is clear. He wants her, and only her. To make things worse he’s refusing to speak. How is she supposed to prove herself on what appears to be an unwinnable case?
Losing is not an option.
She must find the most persuasive argument. Trials aren’t won by convincing judges or fellow barristers - they’re all about convincing a jury. Suddenly, Leila finds herself fighting not only to keep Jack out of prison but to also keep her own secrets buried deep.
Its true what they say, there are two sides to every story.
Guilty or Not Guilty? You decide…
Ok, here we go…. I am not going to tell you must about this book you need to go in blind… the synopsis above gives you a taste but it does not tell you must compared to what this book is packing. It is not packing a punch it is packing a bag of punches!!!
I don’t know anything about this author but I am going to find out!! This is a legal thriller and thrilling is the right word. I found it really interesting the legal information that we get from this book. Our author is a former criminal barrister and it shows!!! We get all the inside information (well likely not all) and it is broken down into easy to understand parts and i found that really good. It wasn’t condescending either but for someone like me with very little knowledge of criminal law and the way trials are run (in the UK or anywhere) I loved all the information that wasn’t just spewed At us like an info dump it was interspersed into the story. Loved that!!!
I really liked Leila, even when there were things I was guessing (not all true) that might paint her in a different light.. i was still rooting for her. I liked Jack as well… and I hated Julian from the get go… but you be the judge… why? I can’t tell you at all because it will spoil not one but all the surprises in this book.
It is told from multiple pov from Leila, Witness X and a couple of others and it is interesting to pay close attention when reading the POV you will get clues… but I really don’t think you will guess everything. I had an inkling But then when I was right about one thing I was punched in the face with a different piece of information or a reveal i was not expecting at all… I loved that so much. Its been ages since I have read a book where it has actually taken me by surprise multiple times.
I actually loved the writing so much, it kept me engaged and I wanted to keep reading into the night.. the fact that I couldn't was done to the fact that I am a light weight when going to bed… and nothing to do with how interesting this novel was. I got up in the morning and just started it again!!
I have nothing but praise for this book, I really enjoyed it, and would recommend it!!
Overall, I don’t have any complaints, are there some unrealistic parts… yes!! Its fiction guys!! But the legal information alone is second to none in my opinion, the characters are expertly written and the twists were outstanding I couldn’t ask for anything else. This is my first thriller back after a bit of a break and what a winner I got!!! Loved it!!
I will absolutely be keeping my eye out for this authors next book!!!
Thank you to Netgalley, Macmillan and Jo Murray for an exceptional advanced copy in exchange for my honest review!!
A dead Judge.
A silent defendant.
And a courtroom full of liars!!
When Leila Reynolds is handed her first murder case, she’s shocked at how high-profile it is, its the murder of a well respected judge.
This shouldn’t be the kind of case shes leading, its way beyond her expertise. But the defendant, Jack Millman, is clear. He wants her, and only her. To make things worse he’s refusing to speak. How is she supposed to prove herself on what appears to be an unwinnable case?
Losing is not an option.
She must find the most persuasive argument. Trials aren’t won by convincing judges or fellow barristers - they’re all about convincing a jury. Suddenly, Leila finds herself fighting not only to keep Jack out of prison but to also keep her own secrets buried deep.
Its true what they say, there are two sides to every story.
Guilty or Not Guilty? You decide…
Ok, here we go…. I am not going to tell you must about this book you need to go in blind… the synopsis above gives you a taste but it does not tell you must compared to what this book is packing. It is not packing a punch it is packing a bag of punches!!!
I don’t know anything about this author but I am going to find out!! This is a legal thriller and thrilling is the right word. I found it really interesting the legal information that we get from this book. Our author is a former criminal barrister and it shows!!! We get all the inside information (well likely not all) and it is broken down into easy to understand parts and i found that really good. It wasn’t condescending either but for someone like me with very little knowledge of criminal law and the way trials are run (in the UK or anywhere) I loved all the information that wasn’t just spewed At us like an info dump it was interspersed into the story. Loved that!!!
I really liked Leila, even when there were things I was guessing (not all true) that might paint her in a different light.. i was still rooting for her. I liked Jack as well… and I hated Julian from the get go… but you be the judge… why? I can’t tell you at all because it will spoil not one but all the surprises in this book.
It is told from multiple pov from Leila, Witness X and a couple of others and it is interesting to pay close attention when reading the POV you will get clues… but I really don’t think you will guess everything. I had an inkling But then when I was right about one thing I was punched in the face with a different piece of information or a reveal i was not expecting at all… I loved that so much. Its been ages since I have read a book where it has actually taken me by surprise multiple times.
I actually loved the writing so much, it kept me engaged and I wanted to keep reading into the night.. the fact that I couldn't was done to the fact that I am a light weight when going to bed… and nothing to do with how interesting this novel was. I got up in the morning and just started it again!!
I have nothing but praise for this book, I really enjoyed it, and would recommend it!!
Overall, I don’t have any complaints, are there some unrealistic parts… yes!! Its fiction guys!! But the legal information alone is second to none in my opinion, the characters are expertly written and the twists were outstanding I couldn’t ask for anything else. This is my first thriller back after a bit of a break and what a winner I got!!! Loved it!!
I will absolutely be keeping my eye out for this authors next book!!!
Thank you to Netgalley, Macmillan and Jo Murray for an exceptional advanced copy in exchange for my honest review!!
November 11, 2025
One of the easiest five star reviews I have ever given, this book is a masterclass on how to deliver a courtroom thriller and has now set such a high bar that I am not sure many books in this genre will be able to reach. Yes, it is THAT good.
I don't want to delve too much into the synopsis, it is a book that you are better to go into relatively blind, but this novel tells the story of Leila, a lawyer from a working class background who has come good. However, when she is instructed on her first murder trial, she is shocked at the high profile nature of it - the victim being a well-respected judge - however the defendant has asked for her personally and she is keen to step up.
The first half of the novel builds up to the trial as Leila seeks evidence which will exonerate her client, who claims he is not guilty but will not put forward a defence. The second half then moves onto the trial itself which is explosive. That's it, I'm saying no more and I know this sounds like a 'typical' legal thriller but trust me it is not.
The multiple POVs tell the story expertly and, in addition to the legal aspects of the book, the personal lives of those within the chamber add an extra dimension without being crass.
The ending is delivered in a way which I have not experienced for a long time, it was a literal gasp out loud moment, and I can't wait for my Goodreads friends to read this so we can talk about it. This would be a good buddy read for people who have it on their TBR list. It's sure to be one of the hits of 2026.
Thanks to Netgalley and Pan Macmillan | Macmillan for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
I don't want to delve too much into the synopsis, it is a book that you are better to go into relatively blind, but this novel tells the story of Leila, a lawyer from a working class background who has come good. However, when she is instructed on her first murder trial, she is shocked at the high profile nature of it - the victim being a well-respected judge - however the defendant has asked for her personally and she is keen to step up.
The first half of the novel builds up to the trial as Leila seeks evidence which will exonerate her client, who claims he is not guilty but will not put forward a defence. The second half then moves onto the trial itself which is explosive. That's it, I'm saying no more and I know this sounds like a 'typical' legal thriller but trust me it is not.
The multiple POVs tell the story expertly and, in addition to the legal aspects of the book, the personal lives of those within the chamber add an extra dimension without being crass.
The ending is delivered in a way which I have not experienced for a long time, it was a literal gasp out loud moment, and I can't wait for my Goodreads friends to read this so we can talk about it. This would be a good buddy read for people who have it on their TBR list. It's sure to be one of the hits of 2026.
Thanks to Netgalley and Pan Macmillan | Macmillan for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
An absolutely addictive legal thriller that I couldn’t put down.
I read this on the plane to Japan, I was completely blown away, what a story. It is full of shocking twists and dubious truths. Trust no one! Such a clever concept for a story… a husband and wife on either side of the law, in a case that looks to be a slam dunk guilty. Only things are. It as they seem and there are so many times that I gasped out loud, and I clapped when I finished it. One of the best books that I have read in 2026, and I cannot wait for the TV adaptation.
You just need to read this and not know too much about the plot. A must read for lovers of legal thrillers. I loved that the author explained the legal system in the UK throughout the novel, especially as it is so different from other legal systems
Thank you so much to Dutton for my advanced copy of this fantastic book to read. Published on May 5th.
I read this on the plane to Japan, I was completely blown away, what a story. It is full of shocking twists and dubious truths. Trust no one! Such a clever concept for a story… a husband and wife on either side of the law, in a case that looks to be a slam dunk guilty. Only things are. It as they seem and there are so many times that I gasped out loud, and I clapped when I finished it. One of the best books that I have read in 2026, and I cannot wait for the TV adaptation.
You just need to read this and not know too much about the plot. A must read for lovers of legal thrillers. I loved that the author explained the legal system in the UK throughout the novel, especially as it is so different from other legal systems
Thank you so much to Dutton for my advanced copy of this fantastic book to read. Published on May 5th.
November 28, 2025
5🌟
Like omg what do you mean? You where not ready for the gasp I gusped when the plot hitted me...
I'm going to keep this clean and simple because you just have to experience this one for yourself and I will not spoil this for anyone!
This was a thriller masterpiece 👌 Brava Jo Murray! This was deliciously thrilling, the suspension was top-notch! I finished this in under 24 hours, that is how addictive this book was!
If you are a thriller fan you should definitely pick this one up like immediately!
Thank you Netgalley and Pan Macmillan publishing for this amazing ARC! What a gift to experience this before someone could spoil this for me ❤️
Like omg what do you mean? You where not ready for the gasp I gusped when the plot hitted me...
I'm going to keep this clean and simple because you just have to experience this one for yourself and I will not spoil this for anyone!
This was a thriller masterpiece 👌 Brava Jo Murray! This was deliciously thrilling, the suspension was top-notch! I finished this in under 24 hours, that is how addictive this book was!
If you are a thriller fan you should definitely pick this one up like immediately!
Thank you Netgalley and Pan Macmillan publishing for this amazing ARC! What a gift to experience this before someone could spoil this for me ❤️
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
Dissection Of A Murder is THE thriller of the year. I knew I needed it immediately once I read the synopsis. When I found out season 2 of Presumed Innocent is based on this, I forgot about my TBR and moved this to the top.
It was a captivating, twisty legal thriller that was so well written. I was blown away.
I will say I wish I ended about 2 chapters sooner, but that is this reader's preference.
It was a captivating, twisty legal thriller that was so well written. I was blown away.
I will say I wish I ended about 2 chapters sooner, but that is this reader's preference.
January 3, 2026
Dissection of a Murder is a gripping debut legal thriller that’s generating a huge buzz ahead of it’s publication day on 7th May 2026 and suffering from acute FOMO I knew I had to get my hands on an early copy to see what all the fuss is about and if it lives up to all the hype.
The answer is simply YES. This brilliant courtroom thriller is an absolute page-turner and literally “unputdownable”. I devoured it in two sittings (if I didn’t have to work, eat and sleep, I’m pretty sure this could have been read in one sitting).
Although there are hundreds of great legal/courtroom thrillers out there, this one stands out for me for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the author was a Criminal Barrister and provides the reader with a very helpful and detailed explanation of all the legal procedures and terminology in basic layman’s terms throughout the book. Thus helping us to understand and appreciate the situations and scenarios without being blindsided by legal jargon. Secondly, the plotline is very, very clever.
A newly qualified barrister, Leila Reynolds, is given her first murder case. Her client is Jack Millman – accused of the brutal murder of a well respected Judge. This is a very high profile case and the defendant is refusing to speak about the crime before the trial. Another concern is that the prosecuting barrister is Leila’s husband, Julian. He’s determined to win this case by any means possible and his reputation is more important than his wife or marriage.
Told from the point of view of several characters, Dissection of A Murder, takes the reader on a tense and twisty tale. With a mystery narrator called Witness X, the reader hasn’t got a clue what really happened to the judge, why Jack Millman refuses to co-operate and how low Julian will stoop to discredit his wife and win this case.
With comparisons to The Silent Patient and Blood Orange, fans of courtroom dramas and psychological thrillers will absolutely LOVE this book
I don’t want to say much more, except pop the date in your calendar (7th May 2026) and pre-order your copy now.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
The answer is simply YES. This brilliant courtroom thriller is an absolute page-turner and literally “unputdownable”. I devoured it in two sittings (if I didn’t have to work, eat and sleep, I’m pretty sure this could have been read in one sitting).
Although there are hundreds of great legal/courtroom thrillers out there, this one stands out for me for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the author was a Criminal Barrister and provides the reader with a very helpful and detailed explanation of all the legal procedures and terminology in basic layman’s terms throughout the book. Thus helping us to understand and appreciate the situations and scenarios without being blindsided by legal jargon. Secondly, the plotline is very, very clever.
A newly qualified barrister, Leila Reynolds, is given her first murder case. Her client is Jack Millman – accused of the brutal murder of a well respected Judge. This is a very high profile case and the defendant is refusing to speak about the crime before the trial. Another concern is that the prosecuting barrister is Leila’s husband, Julian. He’s determined to win this case by any means possible and his reputation is more important than his wife or marriage.
Told from the point of view of several characters, Dissection of A Murder, takes the reader on a tense and twisty tale. With a mystery narrator called Witness X, the reader hasn’t got a clue what really happened to the judge, why Jack Millman refuses to co-operate and how low Julian will stoop to discredit his wife and win this case.
With comparisons to The Silent Patient and Blood Orange, fans of courtroom dramas and psychological thrillers will absolutely LOVE this book
I don’t want to say much more, except pop the date in your calendar (7th May 2026) and pre-order your copy now.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
October 20, 2025
This is one of the easiest 5 stars I gave this year. I feel so grateful to have been lucky enough to get an early copy of this book because it was amazing. It was so clever and perfectly executed and came together so perfectly. It’s made me want to pick up more legal thrillers. Jo Murray is fabulous and I’ve already pre-ordered my hardback copy! Absolutely one not to miss in 2026!
August 19, 2025
The type of twist that makes you want to go back & read it all again
November 16, 2025
What a thriller, shocking right to the end. I loved the trial, the personal stories, the characters, the setting and the tension throughout. Outstanding read! Thanks to NetGalley for the ARC.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Want to read
February 13, 2026oooh this one sounds so good!!
***** OOOH ARC REC'D THANK YOU!! *****
A huge thank you to the author and publisher for providing an e-ARC via Netgalley. This does not affect my opinion regarding the book.
***** OOOH ARC REC'D THANK YOU!! *****
A huge thank you to the author and publisher for providing an e-ARC via Netgalley. This does not affect my opinion regarding the book.
October 20, 2025
4.5/5
Leila Reynolds is handed her first murder case, defending Jack Millman, who has been accused of murdering a well-respected judge. The last time Leila represented Jack, she lost. On top of that past failure, she faces the added pressure of going up against her husband, who is more senior and experienced than she is.
I love a good legal thriller, but I often find they’re not done well. This one, however, was phenomenal—and I think it helped that the author is a former criminal barrister.
The plot felt fresh, and I really enjoyed the multiple points of view. It was so clever, addictive, and well-written that I’m shocked this is a debut novel! I can’t even imagine how amazing her future books will be.
I also feel like I learned a lot about the legal system, and the definitions of legal terms at the start of the book were incredibly helpful!
This came very close to being a 5-star read for me, but I did guess a couple of the twists, and I didn’t love the way the book ended. You’ll have to read it for yourself, though—I won’t spoil anything!
Leila Reynolds is handed her first murder case, defending Jack Millman, who has been accused of murdering a well-respected judge. The last time Leila represented Jack, she lost. On top of that past failure, she faces the added pressure of going up against her husband, who is more senior and experienced than she is.
I love a good legal thriller, but I often find they’re not done well. This one, however, was phenomenal—and I think it helped that the author is a former criminal barrister.
The plot felt fresh, and I really enjoyed the multiple points of view. It was so clever, addictive, and well-written that I’m shocked this is a debut novel! I can’t even imagine how amazing her future books will be.
I also feel like I learned a lot about the legal system, and the definitions of legal terms at the start of the book were incredibly helpful!
This came very close to being a 5-star read for me, but I did guess a couple of the twists, and I didn’t love the way the book ended. You’ll have to read it for yourself, though—I won’t spoil anything!
November 12, 2025
With many thanks to Netgalley for this free arc and I am leaving this unbiased review voluntarily
OOh Jo Murray this is good, seriously good. Razor sharp detail and flawless knowledge give this legal thriller a wonderful edge. The build up to the trial is sublime, the characters compelling and the court room scenes ooze with tension. Although I had an inkling who Witness X was - and without giving anything away it was just the smallest of clues that lead me there - it didn't in anyway detract from the enjoyment. Even though I didn't get that 'jaw dropping' moment when the twist was revealed, it is still an amazing reveal. It's gripping, wonderfully written and very hard to put down. This is going to be a book to read in 2026. 4.5⭐️
Review of advance copy
An edge of your seat courtroom drama so cleverly written and suspenseful with twists right up until the end..... What is justice? It had me so hooked I didn't want to put it down so I read it in one sitting (well in less than 24hrs) With this debut book, Jo Murray has basically just handed us a smoking gun..... but has certainly done it justice!
February 13, 2026
This is a fantastic legal mystery and dramatic court based thriller.
Leila Reynolds is assigned her first murder case, this is way beyond her expertise but the defendant Jack Millman insisted that Leila is the only one he will allow to defend him. Jack is making things difficult and is refusing to divulge any information to Leila in order for her to prepare the case. To make matters worse the barrister working for the prosecution is her own husband Julian.
Told from multiple pov we are breadcrumbed with clues and the twists were definitely beyond my ability to work out.
Many thanks to NetGalley publisher and author for my gifted eARC in exchange for my honest review.
Leila Reynolds is assigned her first murder case, this is way beyond her expertise but the defendant Jack Millman insisted that Leila is the only one he will allow to defend him. Jack is making things difficult and is refusing to divulge any information to Leila in order for her to prepare the case. To make matters worse the barrister working for the prosecution is her own husband Julian.
Told from multiple pov we are breadcrumbed with clues and the twists were definitely beyond my ability to work out.
Many thanks to NetGalley publisher and author for my gifted eARC in exchange for my honest review.
November 11, 2025
Dissection of a Murder by Jo Murray wastes no time pulling you in. Leila Reynolds, a promising barrister, gets tossed straight into the deep end: her very first murder case, and she’s defending Jack Millman, accused of killing a well-loved judge. The stakes couldn’t be higher. Jack won’t say a word, which only makes Leila’s job tougher. Suddenly, she’s in a courtroom thick with secrets, agendas, and half-truths, and the truth always seems just out of reach.
Leila’s journey grabs you. She starts out overwhelmed, but you watch her steady herself, stumbling and then finding her strengths. She’s driven, but she’s got secrets of her own, and that tension between ambition and vulnerability keeps the story alive far beyond the legal chess match. Jack’s silence, the unpredictable jurors, and supporting characters who never quite do what you expect; they all add more shadows and double meanings. The result is a story that’s both tightly wound and unexpectedly intimate.
Murray doesn’t just stick to the surface details of a murder trial. The novel explores justice, truth, and the uneasy space between guilt and innocence. It echoes real debates about how much we can trust the legal system, how easily facts twist under pressure, and how much we filter everything through our own biases. The book doesn’t just tell a story; it asks you to check your own assumptions about fairness, to sit with your own uncertainty.
Murray writes with a style that’s easy to follow, but never boring. There’s a seriousness to the tone, but it never gets too heavy; there’s suspense, even a little humor, and the pacing is spot-on. The courtroom feels alive, tense, but the focus stays on what drives the characters, what scares them, what they want to hide. The language isn’t fancy, but it hits home, and you end up feeling what Leila feels, her doubts, her hopes, her frustration.
What really sets this book apart is how it balances the sharp edge of a legal thriller with the real, personal struggles of its main character. This isn’t just a clever puzzle. It feels honest, messy, human. If there’s one thing missing, it’s that a few of the side characters could have used a bit more attention. They’re interesting, but you want to know them better. Still, Dissection of a Murder leaves a mark. It forces you to look at truth and justice through Leila’s eyes, and makes you wonder what you’d do in that jury box. It’s a fresh take on the legal thriller, familiar in some ways, but with a voice and perspective that feel entirely its own.
Leila’s journey grabs you. She starts out overwhelmed, but you watch her steady herself, stumbling and then finding her strengths. She’s driven, but she’s got secrets of her own, and that tension between ambition and vulnerability keeps the story alive far beyond the legal chess match. Jack’s silence, the unpredictable jurors, and supporting characters who never quite do what you expect; they all add more shadows and double meanings. The result is a story that’s both tightly wound and unexpectedly intimate.
Murray doesn’t just stick to the surface details of a murder trial. The novel explores justice, truth, and the uneasy space between guilt and innocence. It echoes real debates about how much we can trust the legal system, how easily facts twist under pressure, and how much we filter everything through our own biases. The book doesn’t just tell a story; it asks you to check your own assumptions about fairness, to sit with your own uncertainty.
Murray writes with a style that’s easy to follow, but never boring. There’s a seriousness to the tone, but it never gets too heavy; there’s suspense, even a little humor, and the pacing is spot-on. The courtroom feels alive, tense, but the focus stays on what drives the characters, what scares them, what they want to hide. The language isn’t fancy, but it hits home, and you end up feeling what Leila feels, her doubts, her hopes, her frustration.
What really sets this book apart is how it balances the sharp edge of a legal thriller with the real, personal struggles of its main character. This isn’t just a clever puzzle. It feels honest, messy, human. If there’s one thing missing, it’s that a few of the side characters could have used a bit more attention. They’re interesting, but you want to know them better. Still, Dissection of a Murder leaves a mark. It forces you to look at truth and justice through Leila’s eyes, and makes you wonder what you’d do in that jury box. It’s a fresh take on the legal thriller, familiar in some ways, but with a voice and perspective that feel entirely its own.
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
thank you netgalley for the arc in exchange for review!
oh wow, what absolute WHIPLASH.
id be remiss if i didnt start off with an appreciation for how detailed of an insight this book offers into the british justice system. after years of reading british thrillers, i finally have a solid grasp on what a barrister vs a solicitor is, so thank you jo murray lmao
because of how thoroughly the reader is taken through the barrister process, it was a little difficult for me to connect with the story at the beginning. however, the quick pace and short chapters helped to grease the wheels, and before long, i found myself fully engrossed, nodding off while reading past 2 am just to find out what was coming next.
theres also quite a number of twists and turns in this one, not just at the end but throughout the story as a whole, keeping you on your toes the entire time. at one point, there were so many twists that i started wondering how much was too much, but by the end, i feel that every detail was cleverly executed and served its purpose.
by the end, the main thing that felt missing for me was that the characters, as intricate as each of their individual stories were, still seemed...not totally half-baked, but maybe ¾-baked? you'd probably end up with a book for each one if you tried to flesh them out fully, but for leila at least, i wish i'd gotten to know her at a steadier pace. building a gradual understanding of her would make that final line all the more profound.
overall, as someone who doesn't typically enjoy courtroom novels, this was a delightful and impressive surprise. i look forward to seeing this received with the hype it deserves once its published!
oh wow, what absolute WHIPLASH.
id be remiss if i didnt start off with an appreciation for how detailed of an insight this book offers into the british justice system. after years of reading british thrillers, i finally have a solid grasp on what a barrister vs a solicitor is, so thank you jo murray lmao
because of how thoroughly the reader is taken through the barrister process, it was a little difficult for me to connect with the story at the beginning. however, the quick pace and short chapters helped to grease the wheels, and before long, i found myself fully engrossed, nodding off while reading past 2 am just to find out what was coming next.
theres also quite a number of twists and turns in this one, not just at the end but throughout the story as a whole, keeping you on your toes the entire time. at one point, there were so many twists that i started wondering how much was too much, but by the end, i feel that every detail was cleverly executed and served its purpose.
by the end, the main thing that felt missing for me was that the characters, as intricate as each of their individual stories were, still seemed...not totally half-baked, but maybe ¾-baked? you'd probably end up with a book for each one if you tried to flesh them out fully, but for leila at least, i wish i'd gotten to know her at a steadier pace. building a gradual understanding of her would make that final line all the more profound.
overall, as someone who doesn't typically enjoy courtroom novels, this was a delightful and impressive surprise. i look forward to seeing this received with the hype it deserves once its published!
November 9, 2025
An easy five stars. When I wasn’t reading this book, I was either thinking about it or waiting until I could start reading more!
A courtroom thriller which is brilliantly written throughout with drama, secrets and lies. The way in which the book is written is that we don’t have a clue as to what happened really, the defendant doesn’t give anything away by refusing to cooperate and then the legal teams are husband and wife who are the prosecution and defence teams. There are explanations of some legal jargon in the book which are laid out simply to help us understand meanings, I found this very helpful.
It is a very good storyline and has some interesting characters which all make a brilliant read. Due out in May 2026, pick it up and see what you think.
Thank you to Netgalley and the publisher for an ARC of this ebook in exchange for my honest review.
A courtroom thriller which is brilliantly written throughout with drama, secrets and lies. The way in which the book is written is that we don’t have a clue as to what happened really, the defendant doesn’t give anything away by refusing to cooperate and then the legal teams are husband and wife who are the prosecution and defence teams. There are explanations of some legal jargon in the book which are laid out simply to help us understand meanings, I found this very helpful.
It is a very good storyline and has some interesting characters which all make a brilliant read. Due out in May 2026, pick it up and see what you think.
Thank you to Netgalley and the publisher for an ARC of this ebook in exchange for my honest review.
Review of advance copy received from Publisher
3.5 stars. very good debut, but not quite another 'Anatomy of a murder'. Pace is abit slow in places, but the middle had me seriously hooked. I was most disappointed to have figured out the 'too clever' twist a way before the end. But then admittedly I'm Gen X and have probably read a few too many crime novels to be forgiving.
Still, a solid court room drama, featuring arrogant lawyers, toxic parents, toxic partners, many intriguing secrets and a grand passion. Apparently being made into a series for Apple TV's Presumed Innocent series 2.
Thank you so much to Pan MacMillan South Africa for the proof copy.
Still, a solid court room drama, featuring arrogant lawyers, toxic parents, toxic partners, many intriguing secrets and a grand passion. Apparently being made into a series for Apple TV's Presumed Innocent series 2.
Thank you so much to Pan MacMillan South Africa for the proof copy.
January 23, 2026
"Dissection of a Murder" introduced me to the courtroom thriller, and I kind of loved it. I guessed one of the twists, but the rest threw me for a loop—my jaw dropped at the end. The author used to be a criminal barrister and you can tell that in how she writes/all the details she includes. Considering this was my first courtroom thriller, some specifics went over my head, but she did a good job “dumbing” it down just enough to keep me oriented without oversimplifying.
I received an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
I received an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
November 25, 2025
I found this book a bit boring at the beginning but it’s well written. The last 3rd is really exciting and I couldn’t read it quick enough - very clever
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
I was completely hooked at the start of Dissection of a Murder. The use of multiple, seemingly reliable narrators (both named and anonymous) pulled me in immediately — each voice offering a different angle on what’s happening in the story & I especially appreciated the detailed look at what a murder trial in England actually entails. The procedural elements felt immersive and intelligent, and I found myself fascinated by the legal strategy, the tension inside the courtroom, and the way truth shifts depending on who is telling it.
But.
This novel has way, way, way too much going on.
There are so many plot threads introduced — personal histories, side relationships, emotional undercurrents — that by the final act, it feels less like a tight legal thriller and more like a narrative juggling act that drops a few balls or pulls them out of thin air?
For example. Chester.
We’re introduced to him as Leila’s co-worker. We see him only through her perspective — their interactions, an inappropriate moment wherein both act completely out of character (based on what we know about them), and then he is super randomly the person she calls when... Friends, he’s never particularly likable, but he also doesn’t seem important enough to scrutinize too closely. He feels minor. Peripheral. So as readers, we accept him at face value and move on.
But then, in the final wrap-up — when the author is busy tying together the novel’s loose ends — we’re suddenly told how Leila originally came to know Chester. And that revelation - and the perspective shift that comes with it, lands completely out of left field. It reframes their relationship in a way that doesn’t align with how it’s been portrayed throughout the novel. The dynamic we’ve been shown simply doesn’t support the heavy weight of that late disclosure.
If their history was meant to matter — emotionally or thematically — it needed to be woven into the narrative in a way that felt intentional and not super random. Instead, it reads like a last-minute twist attached to a character who never felt central enough to carry one & pulls all the plot threads together. Rather than deepening the story, it made me mad. We’re left trying to reconcile two versions of a relationship that don’t quite fit together. Frankly I was less “a ha,” and more “what the f$&k?” Not in a good way.
The bones of a great story are here. But the excess in the second half — the narrative sprawl + the surprise twists (TOO MANY) + over abundance of shitty characters/people— ultimately weaken what could have been a powerful gotcha/wink wink conclusion.
Would I recommend it? Maybe.
But.
This novel has way, way, way too much going on.
There are so many plot threads introduced — personal histories, side relationships, emotional undercurrents — that by the final act, it feels less like a tight legal thriller and more like a narrative juggling act that drops a few balls or pulls them out of thin air?
For example. Chester.
We’re introduced to him as Leila’s co-worker. We see him only through her perspective — their interactions, an inappropriate moment wherein both act completely out of character (based on what we know about them), and then he is super randomly the person she calls when... Friends, he’s never particularly likable, but he also doesn’t seem important enough to scrutinize too closely. He feels minor. Peripheral. So as readers, we accept him at face value and move on.
But then, in the final wrap-up — when the author is busy tying together the novel’s loose ends — we’re suddenly told how Leila originally came to know Chester. And that revelation - and the perspective shift that comes with it, lands completely out of left field. It reframes their relationship in a way that doesn’t align with how it’s been portrayed throughout the novel. The dynamic we’ve been shown simply doesn’t support the heavy weight of that late disclosure.
If their history was meant to matter — emotionally or thematically — it needed to be woven into the narrative in a way that felt intentional and not super random. Instead, it reads like a last-minute twist attached to a character who never felt central enough to carry one & pulls all the plot threads together. Rather than deepening the story, it made me mad. We’re left trying to reconcile two versions of a relationship that don’t quite fit together. Frankly I was less “a ha,” and more “what the f$&k?” Not in a good way.
The bones of a great story are here. But the excess in the second half — the narrative sprawl + the surprise twists (TOO MANY) + over abundance of shitty characters/people— ultimately weaken what could have been a powerful gotcha/wink wink conclusion.
Would I recommend it? Maybe.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
November 22, 2025
“It may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court”, so going ‘no comment’ is risky! When a case comes to trial, the defence team usually present a statement to the prosecution outlining the defence they are proposing and requiring the prosecution to present any evidence they have which relates to the material in the statement. This should be to the defence’s advantage, but the corollary is that it also makes the defence vulnerable. The first time junior barrister Leila Reynolds defended Jack Millman, she persuaded him to confess all, as a result of which his witness, forewarned by the statement, disappeared, and he was jailed for GBH. Now five years later he is accused of murdering a Judge and has demanded, as is his right, that Leila be his defence barrister. There are problems with this: most obviously, she has never worked on a murder case; secondly, the prosecution barrister is Julian Kesler KC, Leila’s former pupilmaster, and now husband, who is hugely and arrogantly experienced in such cases; and, trickiest of all, Jack has gone ‘No Comment’ so Leila can’t produce a defence statement, which is the classic “may harm your defence” situation. And, on top of it all, an old adversary from Leila’s past is threatening to destroy her reputation. Can justice prevail? Well you’ll have to read the book to find out.
And read it right to the end. Because this is not a straightforward court room drama – although it is a very good one – nor is it a straightforward murder mystery – although it is also a very good one. It is also, in some ways, a psychological thriller, and a domestic drama. The plot is multilayered and twisted, and spotting the main twists and working out the ending is a serious challenge to the reader. The characters are all well drawn, perhaps a bit fitted to type, but Leila is a one off, and Jack is an interesting creation. If it has a fault, it is that the pace drops through the middle, mainly because of the complexity needed in interlacing the plot strands. Not perfect but clearly more than a 4.5, so 5 stars. It is tempting to suggest that there must be a sequel.
I would like to thank NetGalley, the publishers and the author for providing me with a draft proof copy for the purpose of this review.
And read it right to the end. Because this is not a straightforward court room drama – although it is a very good one – nor is it a straightforward murder mystery – although it is also a very good one. It is also, in some ways, a psychological thriller, and a domestic drama. The plot is multilayered and twisted, and spotting the main twists and working out the ending is a serious challenge to the reader. The characters are all well drawn, perhaps a bit fitted to type, but Leila is a one off, and Jack is an interesting creation. If it has a fault, it is that the pace drops through the middle, mainly because of the complexity needed in interlacing the plot strands. Not perfect but clearly more than a 4.5, so 5 stars. It is tempting to suggest that there must be a sequel.
I would like to thank NetGalley, the publishers and the author for providing me with a draft proof copy for the purpose of this review.
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
I usually do not read ARCs so far before their release date. But this book was an exception and I am glad I made it!
The Story:
Jack Millman is arrested for murder. He instructs Leila specifically to lead his defence. Leila is scared - this is her first murder case as a lead. What if she is unable to present Jack's defence satisfactorily? Especially when the prosecutor is her husband (and also her pupilmaster), the King's Counsel, Julian? And making the case all the more difficult is the fact that Jack is unwilling to say anything beforehand, insisting that he will speak only in front of the jury.
As Leila struggles against the inbuilt injustice of the entire system with its strict, but unsaid, rules about genders and seniority, it becomes a race against time for her. Especially with her nemesis on the prowl once again...
What I Liked:
1) The writing: The author is a barrister herself and her experience shows in the story. The cross-examination scenes in the book were my particular favourite. Moreover, the way she takes us inside the rigid law system and shows us all its parts - the highs and the lows. The author, Jo Murray, is a debutante but she shows tremendous control over her words. I will look out for her in the future.
2) Jack Millman: What a character. He talks very less in the whole book, but he remained with me long after I shut the book.
3) Leila: As a female barrister, Leila came across as very believable. She is not idealistic - she knows that as a woman, she will not be awarded the same liberties as her husband, a KC no less. But she does not let this faze her. If anything, she looks at the positives of every situation and tries to land on her feet every time.
4) The plot: As a whole, the plot was great. And the epilogue! It took me back to The Kind Worth Killing when a well-written epilogue can transform the entire story!
What I Disliked:
1) The pacing: The book lags quite a lot in the middle. It is understandable, given that the defendant is unwilling to open his mouth but even so, that part felt stretched out quite a lot.
2) The 'twist': I guessed the twist long before it came and it sounded improbable even so. I was expecting to be proved wrong but the ending seemed forced. (The epilogue made up for it, though.)
3.5 stars rounded up to 4.
Thanks to Netgalley and Pan Macmillan for the ARC.
The Story:
Jack Millman is arrested for murder. He instructs Leila specifically to lead his defence. Leila is scared - this is her first murder case as a lead. What if she is unable to present Jack's defence satisfactorily? Especially when the prosecutor is her husband (and also her pupilmaster), the King's Counsel, Julian? And making the case all the more difficult is the fact that Jack is unwilling to say anything beforehand, insisting that he will speak only in front of the jury.
As Leila struggles against the inbuilt injustice of the entire system with its strict, but unsaid, rules about genders and seniority, it becomes a race against time for her. Especially with her nemesis on the prowl once again...
What I Liked:
1) The writing: The author is a barrister herself and her experience shows in the story. The cross-examination scenes in the book were my particular favourite. Moreover, the way she takes us inside the rigid law system and shows us all its parts - the highs and the lows. The author, Jo Murray, is a debutante but she shows tremendous control over her words. I will look out for her in the future.
2) Jack Millman: What a character. He talks very less in the whole book, but he remained with me long after I shut the book.
3) Leila: As a female barrister, Leila came across as very believable. She is not idealistic - she knows that as a woman, she will not be awarded the same liberties as her husband, a KC no less. But she does not let this faze her. If anything, she looks at the positives of every situation and tries to land on her feet every time.
4) The plot: As a whole, the plot was great. And the epilogue! It took me back to The Kind Worth Killing when a well-written epilogue can transform the entire story!
What I Disliked:
1) The pacing: The book lags quite a lot in the middle. It is understandable, given that the defendant is unwilling to open his mouth but even so, that part felt stretched out quite a lot.
2) The 'twist': I guessed the twist long before it came and it sounded improbable even so. I was expecting to be proved wrong but the ending seemed forced. (The epilogue made up for it, though.)
3.5 stars rounded up to 4.
Thanks to Netgalley and Pan Macmillan for the ARC.
September 6, 2025
Wow what a superb book. A court room drama with an exquisite twist.
From the intrigue of the Prologue right the way through to the incredible Epilogue this book was absolutely fabulous. So cleverly written with plotlines that astounded and delighted. It was fast past paced and utterly compelling. Right from the beginning where we meet Jack Millman accused of the brutal murder of a high profile and well respected judge, we are woven into a web of enthralling tales and secrets.
I loved that the author gave us a detailed explanation of all the legal procedures and terminology but in a very clear way that really helped me to understand and appreciate the situations and scenarios within the book. I really enjoyed learning about the legal side of things.
Then throw in the drama of a newly qualified defence barrister, Leila Reynolds who is up against the highly experienced prosecuting barrister, Julian, who also happens to be Leila's husband and this takes to another level of suspense and tension. Leila is defending Jack Millman who refuses to cooperate and speak about the crime that was committed. The power play between Leila and Julian is delectable. Julian has an impeccable reputation and he is determined to win the case no matter what the cost. Leila wants to prove that she is equally capable of winning her murder case.
The story is told from multiple points of view but is easy to follow and understand. I really relished the other characters that we meet in the book and how they and their lives introduced tantalizing aspects to the storylines.
I felt like I was in the court room listening in as the story unfolded, revelations were uncovered and the truth was teased out. I loved the line in the book 'often it's the tiniest details that reveal the greatest secrets.'
I also enjoyed the setting in Durham and Newcastle. I really appreciated the references to the old buildings and surroundings in Durham and that seemed to perfectly mirror the traditions of the legal profession and the historical details that the author shared with us throughout this book.
A superb, fast paced thriller that will get you heart racing. Highly recommended
Huge thanks to PanMacmillan/Netgalley for the ARC!
From the intrigue of the Prologue right the way through to the incredible Epilogue this book was absolutely fabulous. So cleverly written with plotlines that astounded and delighted. It was fast past paced and utterly compelling. Right from the beginning where we meet Jack Millman accused of the brutal murder of a high profile and well respected judge, we are woven into a web of enthralling tales and secrets.
I loved that the author gave us a detailed explanation of all the legal procedures and terminology but in a very clear way that really helped me to understand and appreciate the situations and scenarios within the book. I really enjoyed learning about the legal side of things.
Then throw in the drama of a newly qualified defence barrister, Leila Reynolds who is up against the highly experienced prosecuting barrister, Julian, who also happens to be Leila's husband and this takes to another level of suspense and tension. Leila is defending Jack Millman who refuses to cooperate and speak about the crime that was committed. The power play between Leila and Julian is delectable. Julian has an impeccable reputation and he is determined to win the case no matter what the cost. Leila wants to prove that she is equally capable of winning her murder case.
The story is told from multiple points of view but is easy to follow and understand. I really relished the other characters that we meet in the book and how they and their lives introduced tantalizing aspects to the storylines.
I felt like I was in the court room listening in as the story unfolded, revelations were uncovered and the truth was teased out. I loved the line in the book 'often it's the tiniest details that reveal the greatest secrets.'
I also enjoyed the setting in Durham and Newcastle. I really appreciated the references to the old buildings and surroundings in Durham and that seemed to perfectly mirror the traditions of the legal profession and the historical details that the author shared with us throughout this book.
A superb, fast paced thriller that will get you heart racing. Highly recommended
Huge thanks to PanMacmillan/Netgalley for the ARC!
December 22, 2025
Where do I start?! Firstly, I read this book in one sitting! It was a very compelling read which had so much more depth than I was expecting and it gets deeper as it goes. The book begins as a fast-paced courtroom thriller, but quickly becomes something far more psychologically complex. This isn't a simple 'whodunnit;' the novel steadily dismantles the reader’s sense of certainty - and not just about the case, but about the people involved and the assumptions we bring to them.
The legal detail felt authentic to me as though the author has first-hand experience of the UK's criminal justice system (my former career!). I looked up the author and was unsurprised to learn she is a former criminal barrister.
The courtroom scenes are sharp, the plot is fast-paced and the writing is excellent, but what really sets this book apart is its character work. The protagonist is compelling, unsettling, and increasingly difficult to categorise; the novel asks the reader to sit with that discomfort rather than resolving it neatly.
There are multiple POVs which doesn't always work for me, however I thought Murray pulled it off very well. One of the POVs is Witness X who we learn more about as the book unfolds. There are many twists and turns - a couple made me gasp(!) and even though I saw one major reveal coming, I didn't see the full intricacies of it or expect it to go where it did. This book is unlike many thrillers I've read in that it doesn't rely on reveals or cheap thrills; it has real depth and takes it further than most.
This is a debut that takes risks morally, structurally, and psychologically. It’s dark, intelligent, and thought-provoking and it's going to stick with me. I think it says a lot that as soon as I'd finished reading it I felt the need to tell my husband all about it and to dive into the questions it brings up with him! Not many thrillers make me think deeply or question my own morality - but by the end, this achieved it.
TLDR: Highly recommended for readers who enjoy legal thrillers with complex characters, depth and a touch of ambiguity.
Thank you to NetGalley and Pan Macmillan for this ARC. I'm leaving this review voluntarily.
The legal detail felt authentic to me as though the author has first-hand experience of the UK's criminal justice system (my former career!). I looked up the author and was unsurprised to learn she is a former criminal barrister.
The courtroom scenes are sharp, the plot is fast-paced and the writing is excellent, but what really sets this book apart is its character work. The protagonist is compelling, unsettling, and increasingly difficult to categorise; the novel asks the reader to sit with that discomfort rather than resolving it neatly.
There are multiple POVs which doesn't always work for me, however I thought Murray pulled it off very well. One of the POVs is Witness X who we learn more about as the book unfolds. There are many twists and turns - a couple made me gasp(!) and even though I saw one major reveal coming, I didn't see the full intricacies of it or expect it to go where it did. This book is unlike many thrillers I've read in that it doesn't rely on reveals or cheap thrills; it has real depth and takes it further than most.
This is a debut that takes risks morally, structurally, and psychologically. It’s dark, intelligent, and thought-provoking and it's going to stick with me. I think it says a lot that as soon as I'd finished reading it I felt the need to tell my husband all about it and to dive into the questions it brings up with him! Not many thrillers make me think deeply or question my own morality - but by the end, this achieved it.
TLDR: Highly recommended for readers who enjoy legal thrillers with complex characters, depth and a touch of ambiguity.
Thank you to NetGalley and Pan Macmillan for this ARC. I'm leaving this review voluntarily.
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
I enjoy reading courtroom thrillers and so I was excited to request to read Dissection of a Murder.
Leila is defending her first murder case, but not only is she up against her husband, who is prosecuting, her client is refusing to talk which is making it impossible to work on her defence. Can she work out what happened and win the case?
The first thing that struck me when reading Dissection of a Murder was that author Jo Murray must have lived-in experience of the UK criminal justice system. I was correct on this assumption – she has previously worked as a criminal barrister. This is apparent in the writing which feels realistic and well-rounded, but Murray is quick to put the reader at ease with explanations of systems and terminology that may not be instantly familiar. The novel shows the less glamourous side of UK courtroom life where sexism, hierarchy and outdated pomp and circumstance run rife. The added dynamic of Leila’s character wanting to fight against sexism, but also getting perks from her husband being senior in the hierarchy was a nice addition.
It is hard to believe that this is Murray’s debut novel – it’s well paced and plotted with twists and turns at every junction. The narrative partially alternates between main character Leila and Witness X, whose identity the reader is kept in the dark about until the very last minute. Their chapters begin with explanation about their childhood and upbringing and slowly start to reveal how they are linked to the case.
The case itself is twisty, and there’s a lot of moving parts, but nothing felt confusing and everything felt grounded in reality. Sometimes courtroom dramas can feel a little slow, but this is a fast-paced read which I could not put down. I don’t want to give anything away, but I absolutely loved the outcome and the reveal at the end and think it was the perfect twist to the story.
Overall, Dissection of a Murder is a twisty courtroom thriller grounded in the gritty reality of the UK court system – a Kindig Gem for 2026. Thank you to NetGalley & Pan Macmillan for the chance to read the ARC in exchange for an honest review.
For more of my reviews check out Kindig Blog
Leila is defending her first murder case, but not only is she up against her husband, who is prosecuting, her client is refusing to talk which is making it impossible to work on her defence. Can she work out what happened and win the case?
The first thing that struck me when reading Dissection of a Murder was that author Jo Murray must have lived-in experience of the UK criminal justice system. I was correct on this assumption – she has previously worked as a criminal barrister. This is apparent in the writing which feels realistic and well-rounded, but Murray is quick to put the reader at ease with explanations of systems and terminology that may not be instantly familiar. The novel shows the less glamourous side of UK courtroom life where sexism, hierarchy and outdated pomp and circumstance run rife. The added dynamic of Leila’s character wanting to fight against sexism, but also getting perks from her husband being senior in the hierarchy was a nice addition.
It is hard to believe that this is Murray’s debut novel – it’s well paced and plotted with twists and turns at every junction. The narrative partially alternates between main character Leila and Witness X, whose identity the reader is kept in the dark about until the very last minute. Their chapters begin with explanation about their childhood and upbringing and slowly start to reveal how they are linked to the case.
The case itself is twisty, and there’s a lot of moving parts, but nothing felt confusing and everything felt grounded in reality. Sometimes courtroom dramas can feel a little slow, but this is a fast-paced read which I could not put down. I don’t want to give anything away, but I absolutely loved the outcome and the reveal at the end and think it was the perfect twist to the story.
Overall, Dissection of a Murder is a twisty courtroom thriller grounded in the gritty reality of the UK court system – a Kindig Gem for 2026. Thank you to NetGalley & Pan Macmillan for the chance to read the ARC in exchange for an honest review.
For more of my reviews check out Kindig Blog
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
WOW! What an incredible debut novel by Jo Murray.
We are only in the second month of 2026, and I have already found my top thriller of the year. I’m sure this book will stay in my number one spot throughout the year. The author had me totally hooked from the very first chapter. The whole book played out like a TV series in front of my eyes.
When I was approved for an ARC, I was expecting more of an atmospheric, creepy read and was waiting for literally some sort of murder dissection, but I was surprised to read such an interesting courtroom thriller.
Dissection of Murder is a true reflection of the author’s professional barrister background. From the plot to the writing and the dialogues, the entire courtroom setup and the closing speeches all screams that this book is written by someone who truly knows the ins and outs of the judicial system.
The plot is simple — a high-profile judge is murdered, the defendant won’t say a word until the trial begins, a husband and wife go up against each other as prosecution and defence lawyers in court, putting their marriage at stake, a secret affair, an unknown witness, and a courtroom full of liars. What remains to be seen is whether justice will be served.
The book is written in a dual timeline and told from different POVs, which makes it all the more interesting — especially the POV from the unknown witness X. The more blind you go into this book, the more you will enjoy it. However, the book does become a bit predictable after a certain point, where you may figure out who the murderer is, but you still want to keep reading to see how and when justice will be served. Another aspect worth noting, and one that left me wanting more, was the cliffhanger ending—I was like, “No, tell me what happened, I want to know.”
I loved and thoroughly enjoyed this book and highly recommend it to anyone who loves a good thriller, especially readers who enjoy courtroom dramas.
This book is also slated to become the adaptation of the second season of Presumed Innocent on Apple TV+
Book Release Date: 7th May 2026
Thanks to Netgalley, the publishers Pan Macmillan and author Jo Murray for this Arc.
We are only in the second month of 2026, and I have already found my top thriller of the year. I’m sure this book will stay in my number one spot throughout the year. The author had me totally hooked from the very first chapter. The whole book played out like a TV series in front of my eyes.
When I was approved for an ARC, I was expecting more of an atmospheric, creepy read and was waiting for literally some sort of murder dissection, but I was surprised to read such an interesting courtroom thriller.
Dissection of Murder is a true reflection of the author’s professional barrister background. From the plot to the writing and the dialogues, the entire courtroom setup and the closing speeches all screams that this book is written by someone who truly knows the ins and outs of the judicial system.
The plot is simple — a high-profile judge is murdered, the defendant won’t say a word until the trial begins, a husband and wife go up against each other as prosecution and defence lawyers in court, putting their marriage at stake, a secret affair, an unknown witness, and a courtroom full of liars. What remains to be seen is whether justice will be served.
The book is written in a dual timeline and told from different POVs, which makes it all the more interesting — especially the POV from the unknown witness X. The more blind you go into this book, the more you will enjoy it. However, the book does become a bit predictable after a certain point, where you may figure out who the murderer is, but you still want to keep reading to see how and when justice will be served. Another aspect worth noting, and one that left me wanting more, was the cliffhanger ending—I was like, “No, tell me what happened, I want to know.”
I loved and thoroughly enjoyed this book and highly recommend it to anyone who loves a good thriller, especially readers who enjoy courtroom dramas.
This book is also slated to become the adaptation of the second season of Presumed Innocent on Apple TV+
Book Release Date: 7th May 2026
Thanks to Netgalley, the publishers Pan Macmillan and author Jo Murray for this Arc.
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
Dissection of a Murder by Jo Murray opens with one of the most gripping premises in recent legal thrillers: newly qualified barrister Leila Reynolds is handed her first murder case – defending Jack Millman, accused of killing a well-respected judge. That in itself would be enough pressure. But Jack refuses to speak. To make matters more complicated, the prosecutor across the bar is Leila’s own husband, Julian – her mentor, rival, and the one person who knows her legal past intimately.
The courtroom scenes, drawn from Murray’s own experience as a barrister, feel lived-in and authentic rather than symbolic or performative – you get the sense of being right there under the lights, watching tactics play out in real time. Even without heavy legal jargon, the dynamics of trial strategy and jury persuasion are presented with clarity and drama.
Murray balances the external pressures of a sensational trial with the internal pressures of marriage, self-doubt, and secrecy. Leila is not just fighting for her client; she’s fighting to hold together her own life. The narrative structure, which includes perspectives from multiple characters and even a mysterious Witness X who claims to know what truly happened, adds another layer of tension.
One of the risks with mystery novels is the reveal itself. Too often, the culprit is uncovered by keeping the reader artificially in the dark, through conveniently withheld information or last-minute disclosures that feel more like sleight of hand than genuine deduction. Dissection of a Murder ultimately falls into this trap. While the build-up is tense and engaging, the resolution relies on information that the reader hasn’t been allowed to fully access, making the reveal feel less earned than it could have been.
That said, the journey remains compelling. Jo Murray’s courtroom realism and sharp pacing keep the pages turning, even if the final unravelling doesn’t quite live up to the promise of the premise.
Thanks to the publisher for the ARC.
The courtroom scenes, drawn from Murray’s own experience as a barrister, feel lived-in and authentic rather than symbolic or performative – you get the sense of being right there under the lights, watching tactics play out in real time. Even without heavy legal jargon, the dynamics of trial strategy and jury persuasion are presented with clarity and drama.
Murray balances the external pressures of a sensational trial with the internal pressures of marriage, self-doubt, and secrecy. Leila is not just fighting for her client; she’s fighting to hold together her own life. The narrative structure, which includes perspectives from multiple characters and even a mysterious Witness X who claims to know what truly happened, adds another layer of tension.
One of the risks with mystery novels is the reveal itself. Too often, the culprit is uncovered by keeping the reader artificially in the dark, through conveniently withheld information or last-minute disclosures that feel more like sleight of hand than genuine deduction. Dissection of a Murder ultimately falls into this trap. While the build-up is tense and engaging, the resolution relies on information that the reader hasn’t been allowed to fully access, making the reveal feel less earned than it could have been.
That said, the journey remains compelling. Jo Murray’s courtroom realism and sharp pacing keep the pages turning, even if the final unravelling doesn’t quite live up to the promise of the premise.
Thanks to the publisher for the ARC.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 104 reviews