I was already quite familiar with Hawkins’s material through videos, blogs and having read three of his other books. I had read that this book completed the power vs force triology and explores the higher levels of consciousness ie from the perspective of enlightenment. I was therefore excited to read this book and expected it to have a sense of completion (in the sense of containing the essence of his teachings and an explanation of the path).
What struck me about this book is that it places great emphasis on Creation and the Unmanifest God becoming Manifest. This relates to the frequent criticism of causality: that the phenomenal world is an effect and contains no causes. The linear comes from the nonlinear. He uses quantum physics to back this up. This is not something I know deeply so I can’t verify if it’s accurate.
Ultimately, everything is just as it is. Given that this book contains quite a lot of metaphysics, I was thinking of where it fits into the general religious and mystical tradition. Browsing through the nondualism Wikipedia page, I came across the section on Tiantai, which I think fits very well. In this tradition, the metaphysics is immanent holism, “ which sees every phenomenon, moment or event as conditioned and manifested by the whole of reality. Every instant of experience is a reflection of every other, and hence, suffering and nirvana, good and bad, Buddhahood and evildoing, are all "inherently entailed" within each other. Each moment of consciousness is simply the Absolute itself, infinitely immanent and self reflecting.” (Brook Ziporyn). And listen to this from J I Stone: “the whole phenomenal world is the primordially enlightened Tathagata.” This metaphysics is not identical to Hawkins’s in my mind, since he also includes a transcendent element - though ultimately both these are ‘positionalities’ that aren’t the Truth.
Not only is the metaphysics similar, but the practice is too. Tiantai is know to include all practices, such as meditation traditions like Zen and devotional mantra practice like Pure Land. Hawkins also says people can follow the salvation of Jesus and/or the enlightenment of Buddha, though enlightenment is a higher (and more difficult) aim. Related is the (neo) advaita vedanta teaching, such as Nisargadatta Maharaj, Ramesh Balsakar and Ramana Maharshi, who he in fact name checks. These masters are also revered by Zennists and so devotional nonduality most likely fits in here.
Hawkins uses both God and Self, with the view that the small self has to be relinquished for the Truth of the real Self to shine through. I think he uses these terms to appeal broadly, because his interpretation of God is not what is traditionally understood. He also gives interesting insights that the duality of enlightenment and not enlightened don’t exist really - it is all just on a scale of absence/presence of the Self. He explains the subjective experience of different levels of enlightenment.
I wasn’t expecting so much social commentary, and certainly Hawkins is a conservative. I get the impression that a lot of his followers are also conservative. I feel that his teachings may make one more inclined to conservatism, and I am at least more sceptical of both political extremes. I think it helps to breed a certain detachment from worldly things, but I also think he hopes to help people who are more in the world to be in it in a more enlightened way.
What of the consciousness calibrations? I think they generally match my intuition about how the world works and sometimes not - but this always gives interesting insights into my assumptions and attachments. I can’t yet verify if it works, assuming I would even be able to. Ultimately, I think the teachings can be followed without the use of them, though the book gives the impression that they are essential for doing almost anything in life.
Most importantly, the practices of letting go, peripheral vision, breathing practices, etc WORK. That is, I can attest to the way these teachings reduce suffering and change one’s perception of the world. Anyone of any faith or no faith can read it and benefit.