Full disclosure: I was sent an early copy of this & asked to read/share review.
I want to say it’s decent and mildly interesting if you’re into Canadian politics. Of course DiNovo is a celebrated MP with award-winning books and she is all about LGBTQ+ inclusion in faith & religion — she made contribution as such in her tenure.
My biggest problem with this book was that it was boring.
Autobiographies are ... a genre of fiction. This sounds like slander but it’s not lol. It doesn’t erase one’s achievement or impact. But, like all works of fiction, it ain’t good without a compelling narrative.
I think I am always looking for more than platitudes and trite slogans in political/social justice books. More than the “i came from dirt and i ultimately achieved success, but also here are some feminist/queer soundbite i will insert into the conclusion so it makes me seem woke”. Save that for blog posts.
If i am to read your autobiography, give me your personal story casted atop the present political landscape! give me data, research, make connections between the past and present! what has changed, what didn’t change. I need something more than a catchy “we must strive for intersectionality” phrase... cmon i read enough of that on twitter. (Not to mention i am more inclined to view that as virtual signalling than some genuine reflection of your life).
There should also be more than the dry recount of the nomination/election process. This is why I say folks who are superbly interested in canadian politics would find this interesting. It was very a straightforward “i did this and this happened” event recollection which to me, a layman, forgot about the content of the book as soon as i read it.
BUT
It was immensely interesting to learn that DiNovo was raised as an atheist and converted to religion. This aspect was truly refreshing: you rarely read about that in queer biographies. It’s usually the other way around. raised in religious family, struggle with sexuality, freedom from religious restraints. I appreciate that DiNovo reconciles faith and queerness as an evolving discipline in religion; after all its all just interpretations of scripture. Religious communities are places of respite, love, care, and solidarity; queer people deserve a place in that community.
Overall, organization of the book and the narrative was lost on me. This could be better sorted into a collection of essays than an autobiography. With the title and the way it’s marketed, I suspect they want to target young people and encourage them to go into politics. I think it might achieve this effect. But also useful to note that young people are mostly already well-read and known in the slogans and phrases politicians like to deliver to catch attention. These phrases are often surface-levelled and without any substantive contents. So, books must then really deliver on the substance, else we’d be happy to just peruse one’s twitter account.
Tl;dr: a decent book, but not one I particularly enjoyed.