It’s amazing to me that we weren’t taught in history classes in high school about the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War—a period we lived through as children. I have a vague memory of a T.V. being wheeled into our classroom to watch the news of the fall of the Berlin wall when I was eight.
It’s not until reading The Magic Lantern that I’ve ever learned anything about the subject, really. As a “witness account,” this read is very emotional. At times the sentences come short and fast, betraying the excitement and energy of “being there.” One of the reasons I chose this book was because it was so slim—I wanted to get an introduction; not hundreds of pages of historical minutiae or detailed analysis. But Ash’s writing is so warm and his reporting so earnest, I finished the book wishing it were longer.
Ash invents the awkward but apt word “refolution” to describe Eastern Europe’s overthrow of Soviet rule because there was both movement from below and “change ‘from above,’ led by an enlightened minority in the still ruling communist parties” (14).
The quick succession of change in the region is inspiring by its varied deployment of nonviolence, labor unionism, electoral process, inventive mass communication, and perhaps, most surprisingly, the arts (the book’s title is from the name of the Prague theater that served as the headquarters for the dissident movement and which launched absurdist playwright Vaclav Havel to power).
Another surprising insight was the importance of television as a medium for “refolution;” ironically calling to mind the oft-quoted Scott-Heron poem/song. The use of television by the resistance was an important way of cutting through the layers of Soviet discourse and psychology that had settled over the years. Also fascinating was the widespread samizdat networks, reproducing and distributing censored works. With all of the recent discussion of social media use in the recent Arab Spring, it was awe-inspiring to think of this comparatively laborious and primitive form of revolutionary communication used just a few decades ago.
Understandably, Ash is quite generous to the dissidents and defensive of their choices. It begs a critical response, and a response with the benefit of the passage of time. I now feel suspense for learning about what has happened since ’89. Which dreams were fulfilled and which ones shattered? What balances have been struck between markets and states? What are the prospects for the future of the region?