A major reassessment of King James I of England and VI of Scotland, revealing the long origins of an uneasily united kingdom.
Bible-thumper, history has not been kind to King James. A cradle king who was crowned in Scotland in 1567 and England and Ireland in 1603, James VI and I has long been eclipsed in fame and reputation by his cousin and predecessor, Elizabeth I, and his mother, Mary, Queen of Scots. Now, four hundred years after his death, Wolfson History Prize–winning historian Clare Jackson finally reappraises his life and evolving legacy, contextualizing both the domestic drama of his youth and the renewed creativity of the Jacobean era, culminating in the commissioning of the King James Bible, as well as the many attempts on his life, including Guy Fawkes’s notorious Gunpowder Plot of 1605. In the process, Jackson reveals how the king’s keen interest in joining worlds old and new—the creation of colonies overseas and, closer to home, uniting Scotland, England, and Ireland—set the geopolitical stage for centuries to come.
Clare Jackson’s The Mirror of Great Britain is a book that explores how the concept of Britain was imagined, debated, and contested in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. Rather than narrating political events in a linear fashion, Jackson focuses on the language, texts, and ideas through which contemporaries sought to understand the nature of Britain itself. The result is a study less concerned with the inevitability of British union than with its fragility, contingency, and ideological complexity. This approach proves especially illuminating when set against the life and personality of James VI of Scotland and I of England (1566-1625).
James himself looms over the book as both a catalyst and a problem. Crowned king of Scotland in 1567 as an infant following the forced abdication of Mary, Queen of Scots, James grew up amid political instability, factional struggle, and repeated regencies. These early experiences shaped a ruler who was intensely conscious of authority, legitimacy, and the dangers of disorder. Jackson shows how James’s accession to the English throne in 1603, uniting the crowns of England and Scotland, did not resolve these anxieties but instead amplified them. The Union of the Crowns created new political possibilities while exposing deep uncertainties about sovereignty, law, and national identity.
Jackson is particularly effective in situating James’s intellectual self-image within these debates. James styled himself as a learned king, steeped in theology and political theory, and authored works such as Basilikon Doron and The Trew Law of Free Monarchies, which articulated a strong belief in divine right monarchy. Yet, as Jackson demonstrates, James’s vision of kingship was often at odds with the political cultures he inherited. His desire for a formal political union of his kingdoms, going so far as to style himself ‘King of Great Britain’, met sustained resistance in the English Parliament and scepticism more broadly. The book carefully traces how this resistance was articulated through appeals to history, law, and custom, revealing the limits of royal authority even under a monarch who believed profoundly in it.
James’s personality further complicates the story. Jackson does not indulge in caricature, but her analysis allows room for the king’s contradictions: intellectually confident yet politically insecure, rhetorically committed to unity yet often impatient with opposition, deeply Protestant yet committed to moderation and consensus. His preference for peace over war, most notably in ending England’s long conflict with Spain in 1604, fed suspicions about his commitment to Protestant militancy. Events such as the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 only heightened anxieties about religious identity and loyalty, reinforcing the very confessional tensions that writers and preachers struggled to reconcile with visions of a united Britain.
One thing that surprised me is Jackson’s thematic rasher than chronological approach. I have to say that this worked well. With this approach she shows how James’s life events, such as his Scottish upbringing, his English accession, his dynastic ambitions, and his management of religious division, became touchstones in broader debates about what Britain was, or ought to be. History was repeatedly mobilised to praise or to warn, to legitimise union or to argue against it. This is the underlying theme of the book, how we went from England and Scotland to Great Britain.
Ultimately, The Mirror of Great Britain is a work of serious scholarship that looks to reshape our understanding of James VI and I and the world he sought to rule. It demonstrates that Britain was not born in 1603 as a coherent political or cultural entity, but was instead imagined, resisted, and reimagined through debate, anxiety, and ideological struggle. If you are interested in the long and uneasy origins of British identity, this book os for you. It is a challenging but rewarding book, one whose themes continue to resonate in modern discussions of union, authority, and historical memory.
From my limited knowledge of James VI/I, I know that he is often maligned in ways. He's a peculiar person, and his sexual persuasion most definitely caused his contemporaries to show him in an unfavorable light. However, Jackson's work does a lot to show a lot of the intricacies of his life, as well as some of the more fascinating aspects of his rule. I was not fully aware of how strong the witch-hunting mania was in places like Scotland, and I understand now that James had a lot of impact and influence on these occurrences. Not only that, but he had a lot of influence through his writings- poetry, the sponsorship of the King James bible, and his letters to Elizabeth.
I think what made this read a bit of a slog for me was how the timelines jump constantly, either within the chapter or between them. There is not a lot of linearity, at least at first, and this was not a stylistic choice that I enjoyed. I would have greatly benefited from having some previous knowledge of James and his reign; therefore, the non-linear approach just caused a bit of confusion. This biography does a great job shining light into a lot of the corners that a more rigid, classically written biography would not. I think any reader who wants to deep dive into James' story would find this to be an excellent companion read to a more traditional biography. In fact, I could see how this will be an excellent resource for those wanting a little more expansion upon certain aspects of his life that perhaps you may not find in other works.
I appreciate being allowed to review this work. I value the time and effort Jackson spent compiling such a rich, well-researched biography of James. Unfortunately, it was a bit too dry and not stylistically a book I enjoyed. However, that does not take away from the importance of this work. It would be a great addition to Stuart history lovers' shelves and will most certainly aid anyone in a further understanding of his life and accomplishments. It works to erase the erroneous and questionable criticisms and portrayals.
Thank you to Netgalley and W.W. Norton & Company for an ARC of this work in exchange for my honest opinion.
The most comprehensive book I've ever read about King James VI and I. This author has clearly done her homework and you need look no more to find a book that will tell you everything you want to know about this remarkable King. Even if you believe that you know all about him I promise you that you will learn more. Presented in an interesting way - nothing dry about this one! Thanks to Netgalley, the author and publishers for an advanced copy in exchange for my honest opinion.
Clare Jackson’s well researched, concise, and interesting biography of James is the best of the collection published in the light of the 400th anniversary of his death.
Jackson’s connection to the actual Mirror of Great Britain jewel, famous throughout the portraiture of James following his English accession in 1603 is ingenious to begin with. The introduction in particular casts this project within the context of cross-confessional early modern debates on jewellery and apparel with regard to worship. From there, it does suffer somewhat. The connection becomes loose and feels rather flat, only really being referred back to in the book’s final paragraph.
Yet, this does not detract from the book’s magisterial quality. Jackson presents a usual narrative of James’s reign through unconventional and largely successful thematic chapters which follow a broadly chronological order. Various unusual details are provided throughout the book which makes the reading experience vivid in terms of immersion in the period. This is an extraordinary feat in a scholarly biography and one for which Jackson should be applauded.
Also laudable is the book’s historiographical significance. Jackson embodies, combines, and refines the recent and rightful shift to a positive view of James in the scholarship. I had wondered what exactly she had been contributing, thinking it resembled too many recent works on James. However, I underestimated her in then remembering that this had not previously been executed through biography. Jackson provides a welcome refinement and re-evaluation that respects and improves upon the works of S.J. Houston and Christopher Durston.
Ultimately, the final product is a masterful, though not entirely perfect, biography of a much ignored and overly reviled king. This should, and I sincerely hope, become essential reading for any student, scholar, or casual enthusiast of Jacobean Britain and the King who made it so extraordinary.
An exhaustively comprehensive overview of the topics and issues of the age, but one which failed to engage me much personally.
It is completely well researched and covers all the bases of the social, cultural, political, and economic concerns, but it also proceeds by topic and not by chronological linear order. So, if you are expecting a cradle to grave overview of the monarch, that is not the main concern here. That would have helped to ground the narrative as it usually does with a biography. We get his upbringing early on, we necessarily get the family issues eventually, and at the end, we get the essential account of his health decline and death. We don't get much else than that nor do we really get a sense of James as a person. Okay, that's not a dealbreaker. Ultimately, what James did as a monarch is his true legacy. However, there is a reason he is mainly known for the failed Gunpowder plot. It is probably the most exciting story of his reign. The foundation of the American colonies is too far and remote to be exciting, and at the end of his reign, nor are the various political entanglements.
I'm not saying that it's a bad book; not by any means. I usually find some grappling lines to keep hauling me along with the narrative and yet I personally felt like I was reading a detailed history account of 22 years complete with hundreds of proper names, most of which register briefly if at all. It doesn't help that other than the 5th of November, very little rebellion, war, or intrigue was present. That which was, was very muted and low on the scale of interest. I've read two highly acclaimed books on James I now, and perhaps it's just me. His reign doesn't seem to be especially exciting - good for his people, I suppose. Not so much for a gripping read.
The Mirror of Great Britain: A Life of King James VI and I by Clare Jackson is an excellent biography of the “First King of Great Britain”.
This is the most extensive, thorough, engaging, and fascinating biography I have ever encountered that is about King James VI and I.
Ms. Jackson has created a wonderful experience for any reader that is interested in Tudor history. I definitely learned more about this monarch than I thought possible, and yet it flew by because it was presented in such a way that I couldn’t wait to read the next chapter.
Thoroughly researched, the author passes on her passion, knowledge, and enthusiasm to the reader.
I really enjoyed this one.
5/5 stars
Thank you NG and W. W. Norton & Company | Liveright for this wonderful arc and in return I am submitting my unbiased and voluntary review and opinion.
I am posting this review to my GR and Bookbub accounts immediately and will post it to my Amazon, Instagram, and B&N accounts upon publication on 11/11/25.
Clare Jackson provides the reader with a comprehensive look at King James VI and I with a biography approached by topics essential to understanding the king. This approach is different than most linear biographies, recounting the subject from birth to death. This does also mean certain events are repeatedly covered, which can slow the pace but does provide insights on impact on different aspects of his life. I had not read anything on James VI and I prior to this work nor on this part of British history. This book was enjoyable and provided great insights on the subject and history of the time..