Noticing the diversity of ratings here (a couple of 5s, 3s and
2s) caused me to remember why I didn't particularly like this
book myself. Many, many years ago I had listened avidly to this
when it was serialized on the radio - over 30 years later I could
vaguely remember it being about the war and a young conscientious
objector, Lucinda's only son Stephen but of course it was about
much more, being a sweeping epic of the shaky relationship between
Australia and England between the wars.
The book was mainly about Lucinda and she was a less than thrilling
heroine, brought up to believe that what society thought of you
was the most important thing - she was really quite a shallow,
selfish woman to be centre stage in this epic novel. Lucinda is
the daughter of the Vanes, a self made family who have made their
wealth "off the sheep's back" and buy a Toorak mansion so the
mother (a rabid society climber) can live the life she feels is
her and her children's due. Lucinda is propelled into marriage
with Captain Hugo Brayford, presumably the "catch of the season"
but the marriage is doomed from the start. Brayford has married
Lucinda for her wealth and doesn't intend to give up his mistress.
To me, this book is pure soap opera, with a few well chosen
comments on the back cover calling Martin Boyd "an Australian
Galsworthy" and comparing the book to "Of Human Bondage" to make
the reader believe they are in for a high class treat.
With Hugo not stopping his pleasure, Lucinda also takes a lover
- phlegmatic Pat, but because she is too happy with the
aristocracy and good life she has married into she allows things
to drift along until Pat finally marries someone else - younger
and available. Then there is the scandal involving lovely Ann who
would be perfect for Bill, but of course cannot marry him because .....
One of the more interesting characters, Tony, is initially thought
of as a suitable husband for Lucinda but she and her family have
bigger fish to fry and he just sort of peters out of the story.