This book is a revealing exploration of representative modes of medievalism. It examines the people, institutions, and moments that have driven societies around the world to reimagine and revive a medieval past. Eschewing shallow comprehensiveness, David Matthews instead offers a careful and extended handling of significant moments of medieval revival.
There is a good deal about the distinctions between medieval studies and medievalism studies, as well as the connections between them. All the attention is warranted, I think. Discerning what Matthews means by medievalism requires seeing how various disciplines within the academy have understood themselves. Matthews is a helpful guide to such questions.
The real meat of the book is in the sort of big-picture history. From Sir Walter Scott and Cardinal Newman embracing structures of medieval ceremony in the early nineteen century to today’s medieval reenactments and medieval markets that employ touristic capital by celebrating a medieval inheritance, Matthews explores the positive vision of the romantic middle ages. Imagined as a world of chivalry and preindustrial economy defined by courtesy and noblesse, the romantic medieval offers connection to the land and a sense of more primitive, and more peaceful, social relations to those who long for a world before industrialism and global capitalism. A negative vision of the grotesque middle ages–a world of barbarity and violence, of cruelty, ignorance, superstition, and narrow parochialism–always follows close on the heels of the romantic. Matthews' argument examines the ways in which communities and thinkers recover both grim and grand visions of the medieval, but also explores aspects medievalism that fall outside this neat binary.
The book moves deftly between examinations of medieval recovery in statecraft, aesthetics, art, literature, architecture, and the scholarly discipline of medieval studies. Matthews shows that an investment in the medieval has often spanned academic interest in historical detail and popular interest in knights and castles. He pays particular attention to what is here called civic medievalism: attempts by writers and thinkers to recover that part of the middle ages that encouraged trade, labor, and industry, an interest on the part of statesmen and business leaders who find in the middle ages a worthy model of infrastructural expansion and open commerce.
Likewise, with careful eye on ways in which being “medieval” can serve as a condemnation, Matthews pays close attention to how the idea of being medieval in the present day has the power to both attract and repel those who see an unevenness of time in our present world. Some societies are disparaged as being "medieval," and individuals are critiqued for "living in the past." This is never in any sense true, but the idea has been used to great effect in many cases, and Matthews offers some thoughtful analysis of representative cases.
So, all in all, the book asks readers to consider why we employ the past to do work in the present, and how the pursuit of recovering the past makes that very past a malleable thing. This charge falls on scholar and layman alike. Careful not to exaggerate the significance of medievalism while discussing moments when it was merely one stream of many, Matthews also directs attention to ways in which interest in the medieval world has been underrecognized. This is a commendably searching and scholarly contribution to the study of medievalism, and one that I'm really glad to have in my collection.