Each section of Elissa Washuta’s strikingly original My Body is a Book of Rules is distinct, and yet, just as a body’s many parts – it’s interwoven physicalities – give rise to the unique abstractions of cognition, perception, the mind, and the soul, the book itself ultimately coheres to form a powerful, at times hilarious, at other times devastating whole.
These unique parts exist both in the body and the mind that are explored here, as well as in several, interlocked themes: bipolar disorder; sexual assault; Catholicism; native identity. Unlike the vast majority of the books that have touched on any one of these terrains, Washuta finds her meaning in a non-traditional structure that comes to mirror her mind and her body’s journey as she moves from her childhood into her adult years.
At first, each theme is explored in relatively distinct and varied forms that are intriguingly original. Along with more traditional analytical sections, which in themselves are laced with sharp insights and piercing humor, there is: (1) an anthropological academic study of the term “hooked up” as it is used on college campuses; (2) a grid that juxtaposes quotes from Law and Order SVU next to Washuta’s self-written dialogue about her own sexual assaults; (3) a hilarious Match.com profile; (4) a strangely moving dialogue with a GPS; (5) many, many footnotes, which often undercut the text they modify.
Each of these original forms not only capture the many varied, conflicting, and devastatingly *real* workings of Washuta’s experiences and of her mind, but also to highlight how drastically earlier explorations of these areas, especially in relation to bipolar disorder, have failed. Time and time again it struck me that the other explorations I have read of the disorder have almost been working too hard to translate the bipolar experience for a non-bipolar world, and in doing so shed the shape and the color of the bipolar mind, leaving us only with vague generalizations of the experience – words like “mood swings” and “on a high,” which mean something entirely different to every reader. In contrast, Washuta’s forms, even with all of their internal conflict and contradictions (scratch that, *because of*) are specific, precise, understandable and identifiable. There is no escape for the reader; there is no way not to see.
Of course, being a (relatively) young woman in the world, there were parts I found more identifiable than others. I was particularly moved by the many explorations of female agency, victimhood vs. culpability, and the lies we tell ourselves as we try to determine what it means to “own our sexuality” while moving through a world in which we are repeatedly told we don’t deserve that agency (or, like, that we should take it, but only in a way that’s acceptable to the people who don’t actually want to relinquish it). I absolutely loved the Match.com profile, and again the footnotes create a brilliant dialogue, at once undercutting the main text on the page and confirming the need for its existence.
Other areas with which I didn’t personally identify instead did what I feel all great literature should: allow me a window into a mind and a set of experiences that aren’t mine, so I can better understand people who aren’t me. There are many sections that are uncomfortable to read, and yet I felt a responsibility to face that discomfort head-on, just as Washuta had done in the writing of it; I’m grateful that I did, and I’m grateful for that opportunity examine my own scars and biases in the process.
As a reader primarily of more traditional forms, you would think, after the tumult of the first half of the book that I would feel relieved as the forms calmed into a more linear state – and I did. I relaxed along with Washuta, I felt relieved to have found more clarity and control in the text as she found it in the right cocktail of medications. And yet, I felt that same sense of loss as the author – the loss of all of those feelings, and of that breadth of experience. What can my feelings be but evidence of just how effective the narrative was at moving me so closely through the bipolar experience?
As a fellow writer and a feeling person in the world, I identify with the chafing Washuta articulates when she hears that many other people have been through this, and that it will all be okay. We do all want to be individuals, after all, and it is true and important that no one else has experienced being all these things *as Elissa Washuta*. And yet, the book still helped me gain a much deeper understanding of what it means to be so many broader identities that extend far beyond Washuta herself – bipolar, native, female, young – and I am again grateful for that broadening. She *is* uniquely Elissa Washuta in the end. It just so happens that Elissa Washuta, with her “fucked up brain,” and string of sexual assaults and 1/32nd native blood and need to touch and be touched and love and be loved and obsession with sneakers and hatred of hiking happens to be someone we can all root for and want to know.
There are moments when Washuta’s prose is so pointed and precise, it hurts, but it’s in that way that says, “I know you.” It pinpoints exactly how I’ve felt, how I imagine others have felt, and the exact shape of the injustice at hand.
My Body is a Book of Rule is a reclaiming of mind, story, identity and form. And yet it is a release, too.
Thank, you, Elissa, for being all of these things, for writing this book, and for being you.