De syv fortællinger i Nataljas fortællinger udgjorde Inger Christensens bidrag til fortællekredsen Septemberfortællingerne (Brøndums Forlag, 1988). Septemberfortællingerne var et af de kollektivprojekter, forlæggerparret Hans-Jørgen Brøndum og Iselin Hermann satte i gang. Selve Septemberfortællingerne har opnået klassikerstatus.
Vagn Lundbye, som sammen med Erik A. Nielsen fik ideen til Septemberfortællingernes udformning, skrev også rammefortællingen til denne danske kollektivdekameron, hvori Barsebäck eksploderer, og syv mennesker derefter er på flugt fra atompesten, mens de over syv dage (lige så mange som skabelsesberetningens dage) fortæller hinanden historier over syv skæbnen, mordet, mødet, det at fare vild, spiritus, det at holde sin mund og til sidst om – ingenting.
Syv forskellige forfattere skrev i 1988 samtidig de syv gange syv fortællinger, udstyret med hver sin fortælleperson.
Inger Christensen was born in Vejle, Denmark, in 1935. Initially she studied medicine, but then trained as a teacher and worked at the College of Art in Holbæk from 1963–64. Although she has also written a novel, stories, essays, radio plays, a drama and an opera libretto, Christensen is primarily known for her linguistically skilled and powerful poetry.
Christensen first became known to a wider audience with the volumes "Lys" (1962; Light) and "Græs" (1963; Grass), which are much influenced by the modernistic imagery of the 60s, and in which she is concerned with the location of the lyric "I" in relation to natural and culturally created reality. The flat, regular landscape of Denmark, its plants and animals, the beach, the sea, the snow-filled winters have determined the topography of many of her poems. Christensen has also been known internationally since the appearance of the long poem "Det" (1969; "it" 2006), a form of creative report on the merger of language and the world, which centres around the single word "it" and covers more than two hundred pages. The book clearly reveals the influence on Christensen's poetic work of such a range of authors as Lars Gustafsson, Noam Chomsky, Viggo Brøndal, R.D. Laing and Søren Kierkegaard. The analogy between the development of poetic language and the growth of life is, as in "Det", also the basic motif of the volume of poetry "Alfabet" (1981; Alphabet). In addition to the alphabet itself – which gives the book its title and provides a logical arrangement for its fourteen sections –, the structure is generated by the so-called Fibonacci series, in which every number consists of the sum of the preceding two. The composition reflects the theme exactly: while "Det" points to the story of creation and its "In the beginning was the Word", here the alphabet is a pointer to the "A and O" of the apocalypse.
The story of her life and work offers access to a poetry that is difficult and enigmatic, but simultaneously simple and elementary. Inger Christensen is one of the most reflecting, form-conscious poets of the present day, and her history of ideas also provides information on the paradox of lyric art; making legible through poetic means what must necessary remain illegible, and in this way wrestling a specific order from the universal labyrinth. Here the transitions between the poet and the essayist Christensen are fluid: just as lyrical figures and motifs give her essays a density of their own, figures of thought and configurations of ideas return as an organic component of the poems.
This novella composed of seven chapters that read like interlinked stories that seem to tell various tales by a woman named Natalja—or maybe not. Images and themes recur throughout, taking on different shades. Who is the Natalja? A Danish woman living in Paris, a French woman who wants to escape her identity, or a writer writing her own or someone else's stories? As with her novella Azorno, the experience of reading Christensen's fiction is akin to wandering through a maze or a hall or mirrors (or both). It's best to let go and enjoy getting lost in her world where meanings shift continually and simply marvel at the connections that appear when you least expect them. A longer review can be found here: https://roughghosts.com/2025/06/22/th...
Inger Christensen writes in the third person but Natalja could be someone else as she describes in the story. We saw what happened to her mother who was to be brought back to Copenhagen by her daughter after her death. We also know about her cat that lived on liver and lived with Badinot when hewn to jail. It was a interesting story that leaves you thinking what did this mean?
When it takes longer to summarize what you just read than it took to read what you just read, you know that some flavor of magic took place. What starts off with a short story, slightly bereft in the ways of momentum, decorum, and tone, quickly branches into an anomaly hunt, and what you read two pages ago continually morphs into a near-unidentical version of itself. If all the oases turn out to be watering holes, were you ever walking through a desert?
Seven interconnected and mutually contradictory stories. The first couple of stories were a bit underwhelming, but each new story adds to the complexity and confusion.
What a fantastic little book! Part Decameron, Part Thousand and One Nights, part exquisite corpse, all sprinkled with surreal Danish imagery. Spend an afternoon reading this
I was nervous to read this one by Christensen after being so blown away by her other novella The Painted Room, but the anxiety was unfounded. Natalja’s Stories is brilliant, but even better than it being brilliant, it’s playful. I think knowing a little more about Christensen’s background, it’s perhaps also a series of experiments in literary theory and philosophy. Someone more focused than I am could probably come to some very precise conclusions between this book and some of the stuff Lacan wrote in Ecrits, but that’s just a lot of words from me. What I’m trying to say is that I can’t really imagine someone not enjoying this book but if you’re into psychoanalysis or literary theory, you’ll probably find it very intellectually stimulating and all those brain synapses firing will give you a lot of pleasure. I’ll be trekking through her oeuvre for the foreseeable future, should I remain so lucky.
mostly wanted this to be over, then the murder story was intriguing, then i laughed when there was another story within the story of the story that was pretty clever, then my head hurt at how vertiginously circuitous it was for a hot sec, accepted its absurdity so i could be over with it, and then was unsurprisingly unsatisfied by the end. pretty unlikeable characters.
Even though this is a very short read, I had to give up halfway through because I just had no idea who was narrating, who it was about, and what was happening. I could not connect with any character, and the story did not peak my interest in the least. Life is short and I have so many more books to read. On to the next one.