Nathalia Holt is the author of the New York Times bestseller "Rise of the Rocket Girls." With "Wise Gals: The Spies Who Built the CIA and Changed the Future of Espionage," Holt once again takes us inside the complex universe of women who changed the world, in this case specifically of espionage, and yet whose roles have largely been disregarded until now.
"Wise Gals" is an impeccably researched account focused largely on four women - Adelaide Hawkins, Mary Hutchison, Eloise Page, and Elizabeth Sudmeier - whose influence on the early days of what is now known as the CIA is undeniable and whose "wise gals" moniker recognizes both their quick-witted ways and their sharp intelligence that helped serve as a foundation for America's burgeoning spy program in the post-World War II years.
In the early days, Holt makes it clear that this was a world that was traditionally "male, pale, and Yale" but these were smart, courageous, and incredibly gifted women whose work continues to be essential to America's security today.
While Holt's work here is undeniably an intelligent and important work, I struggled to fully engage with "Wise Gals," a book that promises one thing but seems to deliver something else entirely. While Hawkins, Hutchison, Page, and Sudmeier are woven into the foundational tapestry of "Wise Gals," the book spends as much time or more time focused on the organizational structure and operations of the early CIA itself. At times, the notion of the "wise gals" feels like more gimmick than untold story as we learn as much, if not more, about the men in this story as we do the women whose lives we're being asked to understand and admire.
While on some level the tone in "Wise Gals" makes sense, after all these were essentially spies whose lives were never fully engaged with their peers, it became difficult after a time to remain fully invested in stories that never became fully fleshed out and to somehow connect with these women whose exploits never quite feel as larger than life as one might expect from a story like this one.
We're told, repeatedly, that each of these wise gals struggles against the male-dominated culture in terms of professional advancement, salaries, and opportunities. Yet, simultaneously, we're asked to embrace that these women "changed the future of espionage" in ways that never really come to life here but at least start to gain some tangible expression toward the book's end.
This doesn't mean I didn't like "Wise Gals." In fact, I did. I simply never felt truly immersed in it and I found it rather easy to put down. I was never tempted to give up on the book, though I found "Wise Gals" an easy took book to put down for the night not because I needed to let the material soak in but really because the material itself never completely grabbed me and made me pay attention.
As a comparison, I might use "Hidden Figures," a book that became a motion picture bringing to life women who were essential in the growth of NASA yet whose efforts were largely unrecognized for many years. "Hidden Figures" brought these women's lives to life in a myriad of ways and it was easy to connect with who they were and what they'd accomplished. By the end of "Wise Gals," I didn't feel like I knew these "wise gals" and I'm not sure I fully understand the accomplishments that each one had fully offered during their service. Sure, I understood that they were accomplished women working in male-dominated fields but if we're being honest that was pretty much true across the board in the 50's and 60's.
I think it's fair to say that I went into "Wise Gals" with unrealistic expectations for a tale of intrigue, suspense, and political insight. No, I wasn't expecting a female 007 to come alive within these pages but I was expecting to gain some sense of what it truly meant to be an American female spy domestically and abroad in the early days of the CIA. Instead, I feel like I got the fairly familiar tale of male-dominated culture that we've read and heard a zillion times before because we already know it was true. Yes, the aspect of it occurring with the CIA adds some intrigue to it but anyone who has ever worked within the government, as I do, knows that it's often the last system to effect cultural change.
I guess it comes down to the simple fact that I expected more from "Wise Gals" than I got. Instead of getting "the spies who built the CIA and changed the future of espionage," more often than not I got "the spies who tried really hard to get promoted but mostly didn't because of those "male, pale, and Yale" fellows except for the occasional one who believed in me and so I was able to accomplish way more than anyone else expected."
There's a difference there.
For those into American history, behind-the-scenes political tales, and tales of influential women, however, "Wise Gals" likely offers enough to give it at least a modest recommendation. While it didn't fully work for me, the research alone here is remarkable and these women do, indeed, have stories that deserve to be told even if I can't help but wish Holt had done a more effective job of telling them.