I’ve read two books by this author now in quick succession – but this is the only one I will review. The other The Women of Little Lon, wasn’t nearly as good as this one. Both are about sex workers in early Melbourne, but because this one is about the most famous of these and more or less only about her, it has a power and narrative that the other one lacks. So that, unless you are particularly interested in the broad sweep of these women, this is by far the better read. I might end up confusing things that are in one book with what is in the other – or even do that intentionally – but we will see.
Madame Brussels is moderately famous in Melbourne. There is a laneway named after her. She owned a number of brothels around the area of the lane. Most of the houses in this area were pulled down for slum clearances, and then in the 1980s, when the government buildings that now occupy the site were about to be built, archaeologists picked over the site to see what they could learn about the lives of those who had lived in the slums. This is an area very close to the state parliament house, but a change in building regulations requiring buildings in the area to be replaced with stone or brick buildings to remove the fire hazard the old wooden ones had presented, had meant that there was little incentive to invest in such expensive buildings in what was a slum. One of those cases where a good intention has the opposite effect.
This area had long been the heart of Melbourne’s sex trade. I was going to say red light district, but apparently that wasn’t a term that had been used back then – or rather, it was used, but mostly to refer to sex districts in the US. The brothels weren’t exactly confined to Little Lonsdale Street, but Little Lon became notorious for them. I’d been told once that the 1880 exhibition had meant that not only had Stephen Street had a name change to Exhibition Street (to liberate it from the stain of association for sex work) but also that many of the brothels had also been forced to move to St Kilda – an inner city suburb that was still associated with sex work when I was growing up. The author doesn’t mention anything about this – despite her book covering the period when this was meant to have occurred. I have to assume this was something that was either not true or exaggerated. It is very clear that Madame Brussels was still running her brothels in the area well into the new century.
Her brothels were upmarket – there is a lot of description here of the expensive furnishing and so on they contained, and of the expensive clothing she dressed her sex workers in. It isn’t clear whether or not she ever worked as a prostitute – and it is also not clear how she avoided run-ins with the law. In part this is easier to explain, since prostitution was not illegal at the time – something I was surprised about, given this is what we now refer to as the Victorian Era – and define as one obsessed with prudish morals – in word, if not in deed. All the same, because she was so well known in town, she attracted more than her fair share of attention from local moralists – what Australians call wowsers – people who object fiercely to other people enjoying themselves. The Salvation Army in particular began a vendetta against her, creating various stories about her acting as a procurist – someone who can get you an underaged girl to have sex with. The motivation for sex with a very young girl (and given the age of consent at the time was 12, well, we are talking very young, I guess) was that there was a myth at the time that having sex with a virgin was a way to cure syphilis. These were the days before antibiotics or before we had a germ theory of disease. We still thought most diseases were caused by bad smells. And Melbourne had no shortage of bad smells – it was known as Smelbourne…
She appears to have been close to the opposite of what she was accused of. She kept an orderly brothel, seems to have sought to get medical treatment for women infected with VD and to look after her workers. There were very few occupations open to young women and those that were open to them paid very low wages. Moralists have not really changed over the years – they hate the victims, but do nothing to stop them being victims. There was talk that one of the reasons judges were so lenient on Madame Brussels was that they were customers – which might be true, perhaps, but it might also be true that they knew that if they put her out of business that she would quickly be replaced by someone else, and likely someone else who would not manage the brothel nearly so well. As she said, no one was ever robbed in one of her brothels – which certainly, from the other book, was not something that could be said of many of the other brothels at the time.
The book speculates that her husband had been homosexual – but that she had loved him, despite him leaving her to become a policeman, and moving to the country. When he was dying he came back to her and she cared for him and appears to have remained very fond of him. Even ensuring that her surname was not the same as his while he was working as a policeman – something that would hardly have been great for his career otherwise. Still, this was found out and put about the local scandal sheets at the time. Names seemed to be much more fluid at the time than they are now. This was not just because, then as now, prostitutes were likely to adopt an alias, you know, as we say today, a porn name, but also it just seemed to be much more common, particularly among the working class. Being called Mrs didn’t necessarily mean you were married, either. This causes the author a lot of trouble tracking people, who may or may not be the one person under multiple names.
She adopted a daughter and spent a considerable amount on her education. But Madam Brussel’s life, as someone says at one point, reads like a novel by Balzac. In the end, although she hadn’t lost everything, she had come pretty close. Her brothels were no longer upmarket and filled with finery, but dilapidated and showing their age.
I’ve always intended to read some of Marcus Clarke’s journalism – I’d been told that he would go into slums and such places, dressed appropriately, and then report back on his adventures. But it seems he was more of the time’s tabloid journalist with an unhealthy does of moralism too. So, I might not bother trying to track his writing down after all. That said, I didn’t mind his novel, His Natural Life.
One of the bits of this that I found particularly interesting was the link to flagellation. The author says that although it isn’t at all clear if this was something practiced in Brussel’s brothels, it was something that grew out of the British public school system. That the depravation and brutality of those schools for the upper class meant that when these boys became men, flagellation was often one of the only ways they could achieve something like sexual gratification. I’ve no idea if this is the case or not – but it is hardly a high recommendation for sending your kids off to such an institution.
If nations can be divided into male and female ones, Australia is a distinctly male nation. Almost all of our myths are about men – taming the bush, going off to war, fighting and drinking. For a lot of Australian history there was a shortage of women – perhaps part of the reason why prostitution was overlooked if not ignored. Madame Brussels – or rather, Caroline Hodgson – is an interesting character. And quite likeable. As the author says at one point, she seems to have craved respectability – something she particularly wanted for her daughter – but that was unlikely, given how she made her money. Even so, given the lack of options, it seems churlish to complain that her entrepreneurial skills were forced to find the only outlet available to her.