I really wonder what happened that this gem didn't gain as much fame as Sherlock Holmes. Intriguing, sometimes far-fetched (but so was Sherlock Holmes), innovative in a way, and curious. However, I may be so captivated by it because it feels like reading Sherlock Holmes. The same time period, the same methods (kind of, the main character is blind so he goes about some things in a slightly different and unique way), the same coolness of the main character, an official that needs help from an amateur... sounds all too familiar, yet that doesn't change the fact that these stories are ultra enjoyable and definitely not inferior to any other detective stories. Certainly better than Agatha Christie's detective stories. The one thing that vexes me is the lack of proper explanation at the end of each story. We learn the truth but how on earth a blind amateur detective managed to reach the truth is a mystery. We can see him taking quite reasonable actions but a few paragraphs later he's doing something quirky. No one knows why and no one questions it. Ok, Max keep your secrets. I don't mind it that much but it does no good to me and my rather slow brain.
Geez, Sherlock Holmes is really a masterpiece when it comes to deduction because at the end of each story there is a straightforward explanation, and everything makes complete sense.
I have the physical copy of this edition on my shelf and I have no regrets about buying it. The cover is creepy af but the contents make up for it. Much recommended to all the fans of the late Victorian era and detective stories.