I hate to rate someone's story with two stars because I always appreciate someone taking the time to share their life and work with others. If I follow the Goodreads guide, though, the two-star "it was ok" reaction was closest to my experience with the book.
This book was mentioned by someone who visited our church who is working with Somalis in our state. I believe the person knew a family member of the author. I was interested to read the story of how a Muslim converted to Christianity and continued to work in their community.
I appreciate the emphasis the author places on the Church being his home when he came to Christ and that the gospel of Christ is what really sets Christianity apart from every other religion, tradition and philosophy.
I struggled, though, with the weak theology presented in the book and was wary of the the overwhelming emphasis on peacemaking. The author's main objective seemed to be making peace. He would employ Islamic and pre-Islamic teaching alongside biblical teaching and though he claimed that nothing but the biblical gospel had the power to change, he made mention several times of how other traditions overlap and make positive contributions to working with others in their cultural context and he embraced things offered by sociology and psychology. His involvement with multiple different denominations seems theologically wishy-washy and at the end of the book he mentions that someone told him that pent up anger can contribute to prostate cancer (which he had) and that he tried to make sure he wasn't harboring anger because he was hopeful that he would live long enough to accomplish more. This connection doesn't have any basis in scripture.
I thought perhaps I was misunderstanding what he meant by peace making (and that it was just his way of talking about evangelism) but he actually contrasts peace making with evangelism and speaks of some conflicts he had with other believers who thought that evangelism should have the highest priority. He also calls some things ministries that seem to have little to do with Bible teaching or evangelism. It seemed like his idea of the "gospel of reconciliation" was more focused on reconciliation between man and man, than between God and man. I got the impression that he mainly wanted to be a nice, Christian guy and try to help people get along and if that opened the door to share the gospel, that would be even better. Perhaps that's unfair. I don't mean to disparage him, but that's the idea I got from his story.
He also writes several times (and includes as one of the four main points of his story) that his Islamic heritage gave him tools for coming to Christ. He writes, "I want to make it clear that my Muslim heritage prepared me to hear and believe the gospel." He says that in college he learned about "redemptive analogies or paradigms" that are "signs of the gospel within a culture" and He draws on several similarities between Islam and Christianity (and the pre-Islamic traditions of Somalia). Emphasizing the similarities of religions that, I believe, are incompatible made me uncomfortable. That, coupled with an emphasis on peace making and conflict resolution, not evangelism, and the shaky theology makes this a story that is interesting, but one that I wouldn't recommend to others.
It's pretty short and easy to read and it's helpful to read about someone's conversion and they way they think form a perspective so different from mine. I'm glad I read it, but I think I would have a hard time investing in his ministry if he were alive today due to theological differences.