Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact” as Want to Read:
Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact

by
4.23  ·  Rating details ·  162 Ratings  ·  16 Reviews
Originally published in German in 1935, this monograph anticipated solutions to problems of scientific progress, the truth of scientific fact and the role of error in science now associated with the work of Thomas Kuhn and others. Arguing that every scientific concept and theory—including his own—is culturally conditioned, Fleck was appreciably ahead of his time. And as Ku ...more
Paperback, 222 pages
Published August 15th 1981 by University Of Chicago Press (first published 1935)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Rating details
Sort: Default
|
Filter
Michael Burnam-Fink
Sep 10, 2012 rated it really liked it
No matter what you do in life, you will never be as awesome as Ludwik Fleck. A Jewish Polish doctor most active in the interwar years, Fleck published 120 medical articles in 6 languages, wrote a proto-STS tract, invented a typhus vaccine while imprisoned in the ghetto by the Nazis, survived Auschwitz, testified against Mengele and co at the Nuremburg trials, and finally fled Soviet occupied Europe to Israel in 1957. They were a different breed then.

Fleck traces syphilis from the 16th century to
...more
Alex Tham
May 13, 2013 rated it it was amazing
This is a remarkable book. On the surface, it is an account of how the scientific diagnosis of syphilis (at least in the early 20th Century) developed out of several pre-scientific ideas such as the religious-moral theory of carnal scourge; the quasi-medical theory of humors, etc. But syphilis is just a case study; what Fleck is actually aiming at is a sociological theory of knowledge that casts doubt on our commonsense understanding of what “facts” are. In doing so, Fleck also issues a radical ...more
Nurshafira Noh
Dec 09, 2015 rated it really liked it
Shelves: favourite
First round of reading Fleck's Genesis. The commentary done by Kuhn was helpful to situate the review on Fleck's Genesis on that time. Fleck's Genesis is recommended to be read for those who are interested to understand the social roots of the scientific fact (a matter of fact, this term 'fact' is also needed to be clarified further) and the relationship between individual scientist, scientific community and the scientific thought. Besides syphilis, Fleck also did mentioned about history of chem ...more
Paul
Sep 11, 2008 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2008
Where Kuhn got his big ideas. Fleck was also an endlessly fascinating man. I don't think that there has been a better analysis of the history of the germ theory of disease. And he chose syphilis as his main topic to boot. Just great.
Michael Denham
Sep 05, 2018 rated it really liked it
By reflecting on the historical background of syphilis, Fleck develops a theory of thought collectives that determine which statements deserve to be canonized as fact. His text is a mentally rigorous exercise at the intersection of science and epistemology and requires a fine attention to detail. At times, I found the text somewhat repetitive; however, Fleck is ultimately successful in building support for a theory that may describe the progression of medicine, science, and general knowledge.
Jon Wlasiuk
Jun 05, 2018 rated it it was ok
Contains the germ of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions decades before but meanders in minutiae and loses the thread.
Joshua Stein
Sep 04, 2012 rated it liked it
Shelves: science
So, Fleck's book is incredibly important to Science Studies and general humanistic study focussed on the sciences. The book was assigned reading for my introduction to science studies graduate seminar at New York University; bear that in mind as I rattle off my complaints [and there are many] and keep it in context. This is a book that was hugely influential for Thomas Kuhn, perhaps one of the most prominent academics of the 20th century. That said, the book is hugely problematic.

Methodologicall
...more
Marcus Lira
Jul 24, 2014 rated it it was amazing
O Kurwa, Poland can into awesome philosophy of science!

Everything about this book is fascinating. Published in German by a Polish physician/biologist, in what's now Ukraine, this book could've shaken the very foundations of science in 1935... except it didn't. As a matter of fact, Ludwik had to fight for his life (and those of other Jews) during WWII after being pushed into Lviv's ghetto. And then, no one really cared about the book for quite a while. Then Thomas Kuhn, an American philosopher, i
...more
Kathleen
Jan 04, 2015 rated it liked it
My professor is appalled more people have not read this book. Fleck is one of the first people to present scientific facts as socially constructed, so he deserves a lot of recognition, and definitely more than he gets now. That is true. However, it is also true that the scientific fact Fleck uses as a case study is the existence of syphilis. This book contains about a hundred pages of detailed description of one of history's grossest diseases. This was a mistake, from a marketing standpoint, in ...more
Bruttins
Aug 15, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Das Buch, das Thomas Kuhn den Weg geebnet hat. Ludwik Fleck, ein Mediziner mit offenen Augen, beschreibt übersichtlich, verständlich und äusserst plausibel, was Wissen seiner Ansicht nach ist. Tatsächlich macht er Skeptizismus produktiv, eine Tat, die mich persönlich davor bewahrt hat, den Verstand zu verlieren. Ein Jammer, dass diesem brillanten Kopf nicht schon zu Lebzeiten die verdiente Anerkennung zukam. Obwohl er das wohl mit seiner eigenen Theorie begründen würde...
James
May 14, 2015 rated it it was amazing
The groundbreaking work on the epistemology of science and how scientific knowledge is socially constructed, Fleck's book is deeper and more philosophical than Th. Kuhn's later Structure of Scientific Revolutions. In these positivist days, when any doubt of the current scientific orthodoxy is ridiculed and censured, Fleck gives a much-needed dose of perspective.
Reed
Sep 10, 2015 rated it liked it
Although his writing style was hard for me to handle, the points of the book are very important and thought provoking.
Edward Fenner
It's a seminal work, but a slog to read.
Timothy Champney
Aug 31, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Ground-breaking insight into the thought collectives that drive science.
Chris
May 28, 2008 rated it liked it
Where it all comes from.
Kevin Fodness
May 19, 2009 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: non-fiction
An excellent introduction to the social construction of scientific knowledge. Fleck was perhaps the first person to lay out the argument that science is socially constructed. An STS classic.
John
rated it really liked it
Aug 31, 2014
Alice
rated it it was amazing
Sep 18, 2017
Jordan
rated it really liked it
Oct 15, 2018
Ashley Squires
rated it it was amazing
Jul 10, 2012
Colin Burke
rated it really liked it
Nov 19, 2015
Jonathan
rated it it was amazing
May 29, 2018
Alexey
rated it it was amazing
Nov 20, 2014
Blair
rated it really liked it
Aug 08, 2014
Aga Góra
rated it it was amazing
Jan 08, 2018
Natalie Weaver
rated it liked it
May 04, 2008
Lisa
rated it it was amazing
Aug 25, 2012
Shane Hunt
rated it really liked it
Aug 17, 2015
Greg Oxenham
rated it it was ok
Dec 19, 2015
Der Steppenwolf
rated it liked it
May 26, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society
  • Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
  • The Golem: What You Should Know about Science
  • The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice
  • Drugs for Life: How Pharmaceutical Companies Define Our Health
  • Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings
  • Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life
  • The Social Construction of What?
  • How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis
  • A Social History Of The Media: From Gutenberg To The Internet
  • Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas
  • Farewell to Reason
  • The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology
  • The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness
  • Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge
  • Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction
  • Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living
  • Fact, Fiction, and Forecast
1 follower
Ludwik Fleck (11 July 1896 – 5 June 1961) was a Polish and Israeli physician and biologist who did important work in epidemic typhus in Lwów, Poland, with Rudolf Weigl and in the 1930s developed the concept of the "Denkkollektiv" ("thought collective"). The concept of the "thought collective" is important in the philosophy of science and in logology (the "science of science"), helping to explain h ...more
“La introducción en un campo de conocimiento es más un adoctrinamiento que un estímulo del pensamiento crítico-científico. El tiempo de aprendizaje —en la ciencia tanto como en la industria, el arte o la religión— se caracteriza por una «sugestión de ideas puramente autoritaria».” 1 likes
“Sie findet den Ausdruck als gemeinsame Verehrung eines Ideals, des Ideals objektiver Wahrheit, Klarheit und Genauigkeit. Sie besteht aus dem Glauben, daß Verehrtes erst in weiter, vielleicht unendlich weiter Zukunft erreichbar sei. Aus der Lobpreisung sich seinem Dienste aufzuopfern. Aus einem bestimmten Heroenkult und einer bestimmten Tradition. Dies wäre der Grundton der gemeinsamen Stimmung, in der sich das naturwissenschaftliche Denkkollektiv auslebt. Kein Eingeweihter wird behapten, das wissenschaftliche Denken sei gefühlsfrei.” 1 likes
More quotes…