Who Is Your Refuge When All Goes Wrong?
I don’t think I’ve ever disliked a character as instantly or thoroughly as I disliked Georgia Lennox. Insipid, shallow, manipulative, and frankly without a thing about her to interest me, I didn’t know how I’d get through the book. Exactly what the author wanted, by the way.
Don’t get me wrong. I had no doubt that somewhere around the middle, I’d be given a reason to be sympathetic to her, and all would be well. It’s one of the troubles of reading a bunch and learning writing craft. You just tend to know when what will happen.
The problem was, I really liked Harrison Wells, and I wanted better for him—even knowing that I’d like Georgia by the end. Or rather, knowing I’d have no reason to dislike her. Still, although she is written to become a sympathetic character due to childhood hurts and losses (and written well, I might add), she just comes off as ridiculous. Yes, she changes—or rather… well, I can’t actually say without creating spoilers. I’ll just say this.
Georgia, by the end of the book, became someone I’d enjoy knowing, but who she was until the end of the book was so annoying and shallow that I’m not sure I would have allowed myself to be in her company enough to realize there had been a change.
Knowing that the original dress on the cover of the book had been blue had me watching out for clues as to whether it was a design or a story choice, and I was happy to know how it plays in the book. Furthermore, it was a well-done bit of showing characterization in a different way than we’re accustomed to.
I dreaded the slavery angle.
Look, I know it happened. I also know that pretending it didn’t or ignoring that fact is not the way to handle such a disgusting part of human history. It’s been an ugly part of humanity almost from the beginning, and I suspect it’ll be a horrible one until the last man leaves earth.
But I don’t like reading about it. How Lorri Dudley handled the slavery issue on the island was nothing short of brilliant. She showed the ugliness without overshadowing the rest of the story with it. The book wasn’t about slavery, so that was good. However, it took place in an area where it was a big part of life. Ignoring it would have been ridiculous and insulting. Her balanced approach with a Biblical but not preachy addressing of it—seriously. I said it before. Saying it again now. Brilliant.
The primary plots and subplots wove together very nicely. I did find the jumps back in time jarring. I don’t think there was a single one that I needed to understand where the story was going and why. That said, they were also some of the most well-written sections. Most likely, this is a personal thing that others would disagree with. I usually LIKE more and more, so feeling like they’re not necessary is kind of odd for me.
I had a few small problems with The Duke’s Refuge—nothing major.
Some points were a little repetitive. I know at least once I said aloud (and scared myself in the silence of the place where I was reading), “Okay… we get it. You made sure of that.” Still, it really wasn’t that bad as much as I wanted to get past it to find out if what I thought would happen next would or not! So… it’s a thing, but nothing most people would have a problem with.
The inconsistencies, though. There weren’t many, but one, in particular, jumped out because it was in the same scene. In one sentence, we’re told Georgia can hardly remember her father’s hugs. The next paragraph (or maybe two) later, we’re treated to a detailed, vivid memory. I went back up and reread the other part several times, trying to figure out if she just didn’t remember but then once she had the hug she remembered… but it didn’t read that way to me.
And for those who are really bothered by small typos, I purchased the book last night (so most recent version as of posting this), and recall two very clearly and have a vague recollection of a few more. Add to those a few anachronistic phrases (several of which probably FEEL more anachronistic than really are), and there’s a bit that will jar a picky reader, but not many.
Aaah… and then there’s the spiritual content.
I just want to thank Lorri Dudley right now for putting something in The Duke’s Refuge that will keep my mind thinking about Scripture, my faith, what the Lord wants of me, what He’s done for and doing for me… Thank you.
I found the conversion scenes a little modern, but you know what? Like pink being a “girl color” (which Ms. Dudley discusses at the end of the book), sometimes you do what is best for the story or the reader rather than what is 100% accurate. Some of it did jerk me out of the story, but I used those instances to focus on the spiritual side rather than the story and just let it go. Let’s face it. We all do it with every book to some degree.
Although I requested a review copy of The Duke’s Refuge and think I have it somewhere, I actually purchased this one to read and am glad I did. I’ll be reading the next one, too. I strongly suspect I’ll like it even more.
Recommended for lovers of Regency novels that aren't just ballrooms and beauties, lovers of second chances, and lovers of reminders about Who is our true Refuge.