I'm a big fan of Teal, moreso than any other modern spiritual or self-help guru, as there is tremendous value in her experiences, honesty, insights, and rituals... however this book goes off the deep end in purporting its suggestions of beliefs, actions, habits, and rituals with unfounded claims and woo, so much so it becomes a chore to digest and there is no need!
• The placebo of the ritual of imbuing love into the consumed water to baptise oneself does not need to be justified by claims of psychic living water rejected by newtonian scientists.
• The benefit of changing one's map of meaning by acting and thinking as if you love yourself does not need to be justified by claims of vibrational alignment towards the true intention of the universe.
• The benefits of incorporating playfulness in your outlook does not need to be justified by the claims that a lack of self-love is the cause of all wars.
However such is where Teal plays tautological tricks on us, seemingly accidentally. It all depends on how she defines a word at a given time, "objective" is equivocated into merely a subjective claim about the world, "reality" becomes our perceptions, "self" becomes everything, "vibration" becomes compatibility, "truth" becomes belief. Deploying this interface one discovers far less validity in her words than supposed, even if found meaningful.
The shallowness of the deep is throughout, perhaps because if reckless hedonistic happiness is the true path to self-love and doing anything that makes us unhappy is self-hatred, then what is the imperative for ever going beyond tautology when we can limit ourselves to surface level sophistry to make our shallow conceptualisations conform to validate our own experiences towards happiness, retaining blissful ignorance to any agreement or disagreement bubbling up from the sophistication of what's bellow the deep, notably in this book's case we float only atop of the humanities, the scientific method, and economics, but never within.
However of course, in true tautological fashion, reading between the lines one will find Teal's guidance is not necessarily opposed to revision, because the true nature of love of the universe will prompt it within our souls... how so? By slapping us until we enjoy revision, becoming our vibrational alignment with the aether. Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil, Defoe's Robinson Crusoe, Allen's Poverty to Power, heck even Odin's Havamal and Hesoid's Works and Days are all being channeled here.
There is value in this book, it is diamonds in the coal... you go mining for the treasure, while getting covered in soot, that only diligence (and a fallacy cheat sheet) will clean, leaving each reader with their own meaning behind the words; but no one will be left unscathed, even if all get wise.
Interfacing with skeptics during editing would solve this critique, making a quality book that every reader understands equitably. Find skeptics that have studied the humanities.