I am thoroughly whelmed.
Mind you, this is not an insult, it is merely the result of trying to balance the great ideas and the messy execution of them; it is the result of my REALLY LOVING the foundation that Pechaček has built his world and story on but being very mixed on the end-product as is. To be fair, several of my personal "issues" with "The West Passage" come down to personal taste - maybe even a portion of how I might have personally structured the story. But many of said "issues" are actually what in my mind feel like a thoroughly impressive proof of concept.
I liked "The West Passage". I liked it quite a bit. I liked the world, I liked the tone, I liked the vibe of many of what feels like folklore and fairytale influences coming together. I liked the development of the plot: the introduction and conclusion especially. Almost all of the little components of the book were effective...but underbaked, in my opinion.
In fairness, I must praise the things that I liked! "The West Passage" is far from a *bad* book, and there is tons of great potential here. I personally think of it like one of the best proofs of concept I've read:
1.) The worldbuilding and setting feels so unique, and the tone of it is just right for the general vibes of the story. Trying to put together the setting is difficult and obtuse in the wrong ways some times, but I think that Pechaček did a great job building it out, even if not always at explaining it.
2.) The folklore-ish tone and fairytale vibes just HIT. Even if a lot of the characters and the creatures they are very rarely come through clearly*, I think the foundation for what is a visually and conceptually striking setting with interesting dynamics between the various "houses" and Towers of the world is solid.
* In fact, many characters you don't even know what they are until like several chapters later when you are given a random, specific physical characteristic such as quills or some such. One of the two main POV characters I didn't even know had a particular trait to her hair until legit the last 10 pages of the book.
3.) There are, indeed, MANY interesting plot devices and characters that do a lot for fleshing out the intrigue of the world and bits of its history.
4.) The set-up of the two main characters' separate-but-connected storylines was very well done, and concluded quite well.
5.) The brevity of the novel was appreciated, though I think it might have been better served in a trilogy (or, alternatively, in a much longer volume; the tone of the story, however, would be more conducive to (hypothetically) 2 or 3 of these small-dimension, sub-400 or even sub-300 page books rather than one much larger tome that would likely catch the attention of a slightly different audience and scare away what seems like might be closer to the actually-intended audience).
In general, the potential oozing from "The West Passage" is palpable and commendable, especially from a debut effort. I greatly respect the author what the shots he took here: I've not anything quite like this novel, and I don't think I will again, except if he writes another story in this world.
But, as you may have been able to tell from even those brief praises, even the great stuff is held back by some things that struck me as off, for one reason or another:
1.) The physical descriptions of the world are obtuse and sometimes don't make sense. Directions and journeys are pretty hard to follow on a macro-level, so I had to just make do with enjoying the activities of the moment.
2.) I already spoke on the creature aspect: descriptions and explanations of the various peoples and how people and things and parts of the world actually *look* is very underdone; it is to the point that I'd argue "The West Passage" should have been a film rather than a novel. There are SO MANY THINGS in here that SO VISUALLY INTERESTING that you just don't *realize* are interesting because they're either glossed over or not mentioned at all outside of one random reference way later than they should be. In a film, the under-explained visual motifs and beautiful eccentricities of the world and peoples would just be inherent to the medium, and thus an entire category of flaw in this format is nullified.
3.) Characters and their interactions and relationships are slightly underserved the way the world and setting is, in my opinion. Just a few chapters apart, a pair of characters can have an entirely different dynamic that is sort of implied based on what is TOLD to you that happens, rather than any of those changes actually being shown (more on this in point 5.).
4.) I confess I struggled a tiny bit during the middle 25% or so of the book, but generally I did enjoy following both storylines.
5.) The brevity is good. The (I think) fact that this is (I'm pretty sure anyway) a standalone is a GREAT selling point! Unfortunately, as I said in Point 5.) in the previous list, I'm not sure it did this book a ton of favors. The plot itself moved with pretty decent pacing overall, but with character dynamics being a bit more told rather than shown and the world and general descriptions and similar being undercooked on top of that, I felt like I was just wandering in a "I sort of get it" kind of way, rather than being all-in, if that makes sense. Expanding this story from 370 pages to...say 750-ish (so about twice as long), and splitting that into volumes of 250 or so pages (or just 2 volumes of about this length), Pechaček could have kept the same plot, but expanded upon the things that feel like they're missing, deepened the reader's connection to the characters and world, and also added a little more detail and smaller steps to the plotting to make it more eventful instead of halfway skipping from scene to scene (in some cases) or from short sub-section to sub-section.
I don't know if any of that made any sense...but I'm gonna role with it.
Beyond my quasi-nitpicks and feedback regarding how the good things could've been better, I only had 1 true negative reaction: the cursing. The tone and vibes of "The West Passage" are, how shall we say, not exactly conducive to the modern "This book SWEARS, see?" mentality that much modern media has taken to. Yet Pechaček uses a handful of curse words a handful of times, and all but like 1 of those instances just do not jive with the book. They come off as forced, immersion-breaking, and eye-rolly, rather than deepening the atmosphere of the story. It would have been better to just not have any at all, especially since the vibe seems like it could be targeted at a somewhat younger audience - to a degree, anyway.
Oh, and I actually remembered a second thing - this one fairly minor and more related to personal taste than anything: the interlude at the various Towers. A couple of the interludes contain content that kinda skirts the lines of being adult content, and I don't think it fit (again) the tone of the rest of the book. Each interlude has SOMEthing happen that felt antithetical to what else was being built - whether that be the more action-oriented Black Tower interlude or the Blue Tower one that all but had a sex scene for...some reason. I don't know. It seemed off.
And lest anyone think I'm being a prude, one of my favorite books this year - if not my Book of the Year straight-up - is "The Failures" by Benjamin Liar. The amount of cursing and adult references in that book trump those found in "The West Passage" many, many, MANY times over. I simply don't think it fits here.
But again I come down to how I'm going to remember "The West Passage" in the future. I think that despite my nitpicks, despite the things I think could be improved, despite even the fact that I referred to the book as simple "fantastic proof of concept" - thereby potentially implying I didn't particular like it - I will remember this novel quite fondly. It has enough going for it that I yet remain a fan. Hell, maybe I'm not the direct target demographic! I don't know...
What I do know is that there are going to people who adore this book. In fact, a friend - hey, Orion! Hi! - is turning into one of those people right now last I heard. There is definitely an audience for whom everything about this is going to click perfectly in place, regardless of what I claim are problems. There are going to be people for whom "The West Passage" steals their heart. I actually think that in another world, or perhaps in another time a few years in my past, I could have also been one of those people.
So even though I did not love "The West Passage" now, I will likely always remember it in a positive light. And I am 100% interested in checking out whatever Pechaček does next, whether in this setting or not. He's definitely on to something. He's got an eye for the unique, and I want to see what it captures next.