I was already a strong proponent of real, whole foods before opening this book, but I was interested in the clean eating approach and the anti-inflammatory diet because of some digestive issues I've been fighting for a couple of years. I'm only weeks into following the guidelines in this book, and it will likely be a few months before I know if this approach is the answer for me so I can't speak to its efficacy per se — but I can share my top impressions of, and responses to, the book's content. I'll review the nutrition and exercise components of the book separately.
Nutrition
1. If you are just getting started in the world of whole foods, this book is an excellent choice. It gives a broad, comprehensive overview of our cultural understanding of "healthy eating," our modern dietary habits, and our reliance on processed food — and it speaks to why we need to shift our perspective. If, however, you're already well informed in this area, you already eat vegan a couple of days each week, and/or you live in Portland, you might feel like the authors are preaching at you. The content is extremely repetitive, and their use of "Clean Cuisine" as a proper noun — when another noun, like "clean eating" or "whole foods eating" would have been sufficient — feels rather pompous and off-putting.
2. Because the intended audience for this book is people who are new to the world of clean eating, the implementation plan for the diet is presented in phases over an eight-week period. This is fantastic for the intended audience but rather inaccessible to the rest of us. I wanted to dive into week 8 from the get-go, and to do so, I had to read through all eight weeks and jot down the changes from each week so I could make a summation. I respect that they don't want to overwhelm people who are just getting started; that gentle approach is so needed. But it would be helpful if they had an addendum that summarizes all of the nutrition changes, supplements, exercise, and other practices/tips in one place.
3. My favorite thing about this book is the incredible amount of freedom that the authors give you in crafting your eating plan. Their advice is deeply sane, and they even admit that vegan cheese is not good. (There are some very tasty vegan cheeses out there, but let's be real for a moment: That is not cheese. It's something else altogether.) Still want to eat meat every day? Go for it, but try to eat vegan the rest of the day, and make sure your choices are pastured, organic meats. Hate steel-cut oats? Try brown rice for breakfast instead. Don't like spinach salad? Use other lettuces for lunch, and try cooked spinach with dinner.
4. The recipes live up to the hype. They promise flavorful clean meals and they deliver. I never had the misconception that clean/vegan meals were dull and tasteless, so they didn't need to sell me on this, but it's handy to have a quick reference of recipes right in the book — especially for green smoothies and breakfast smoothies (of which you can never have too many variations, in my opinion). I especially loved their tip to make chopped salads — and you don't need a $30+ mezzaluna to do it. A chef's knife works quite well.
5. To make this way of eating work for you, you will need a high-powered blender. There's really no way around it. The authors recommend a variety of other equipment — like the mezzaluna — but don't get overwhelmed. Put your pennies toward a Vitamix and ignore the rest.
Exercise
I will preface by saying that this is where the book fell apart for me. If I could go back in time, I would just skip this chapter altogether, because after reading it, it was difficult not to throw the baby out with the bathwater (and throw this book into the library donations pile). But I knew that the nutrition information was solid, so I can still recommend this book for that purpose while wishing that they had simply stopped at chapter 7.
1. The authors give so much freedom in the nutrition section and then offer zero freedom in exercise. No other workouts are acceptable, and they make snide remarks about other approaches to fitness. That gave me a bad taste in my mouth from the get-go. Anyone who has ever gone to the gym, taken a fitness class, or even walked around the block knows that you'll never do a form of exercise you don't enjoy. Exercise is where we need the most freedom, not the least.
2. The tone of this section is incredibly condescending and, frankly, a bit insulting. They present their exercise regiment as the only acceptable form of exercise (and if that isn't a red flag to you, it should be) and then go on to provide the scientific evidence for this claim — but many of the conclusions that they draw are associative, the examples they mention are anecdotal, and/or the connections they draw are misleading. For example, they make several digs at marathon runners, and then talk about how low-intensity, steady cardio isn't the way to burn fat or strengthen your body. I don't know how many marathon runners you know, but all of the ones I know are constantly pushing themselves — running high-intensity intervals, pushing for a faster mile pace, etc. If they want to make a case that a brisk walk around the neighborhood isn't doing much to help you (and they do say that directly — and I have more thoughts on this below), that's fine, but don't drag serious athletes into your argument. And furthermore, when was the last time you met a marathon runner, master swimmer, distance cyclist, triathlete, etc. who didn't have a strong, lean body? It's absurd to discourage these people from doing the exercise they are passionate about, and by doing so, you risk alienating them from a nutrition plan that could harmonize beautifully with their athletic training.
3. There is substantial evidence that having an active life is just as, if not more, important to cardiovascular health than doing intense workouts. And yet the authors don't speak to this at all and, in fact, contradict that research altogether and completely discount the value of brisk walks, bike riding, etc. Their tone is belittling when they speak of these activities. I know that we've all played the "oh, I walked to the mailbox today, so I can totally eat that cookie" card, but at the same time, you can't substitute 90 minutes of weekly exercise for intentionally being active in your daily life. There needs to be balance here. I completely agree that optimal fat burning does not occur during a 20-minute walk around the neighborhood — but that walk likely had countless other health benefits, and activity is always better than non-activity. Again, I think this speaks to the complete lack of freedom that the authors present in this section of the book.
4. The workouts themselves are good — similar to Jillian Michaels and other workouts in that vein — but make no mistake: These are not 30-minute workouts. The authors talk at great length about how short workouts are important and how their workouts will have you in and out in 30 minutes, but that simply isn't the case. Each workout consists of a warm-up, routine, and cool-down. At first, I expected to complete all three in 30 minutes — but as soon as I saw that the warm-up was 10 minutes, I knew that couldn't be the case. In fact, the routines alone are all a bit longer than 30 minutes, so by the time you've added on a 10-minute warm-up and a 10-minute cool-down, you're at nearly an hour all told. The authors emphasize the importance of stretching (which is often so overlooked, to the detriment of many aspirant exercisers), but if your workout has already taken 10-15 minutes longer than you expected, you're likely to skip your cool-down altogether because you need to hop in the shower and get to work on time.
Now, don't misunderstand me: I have no problem with hour-long workouts. I think that 60 minutes is a perfectly reasonable amount of time to spend exercising, especially if you're only working out three times each week. But the expectation that they set in the description is only going to cause disappointment and frustration. People are going to feel like they're doing the routines incorrectly because it's taking them so long, or they're going to get frustrated because they didn't allocate as much time as they needed to complete the routine. I wish that the authors had simply described these as fast-paced workouts that can be completed in 45-60 minutes, depending on which routine you do and how much time you allocate for cool-down stretching at the end.
5. If you want to do these workouts at home, you're going to need to invest several hundred dollars into equipment. In that way, these workouts are far less convenient than Jillian Michaels and others that offer similar benefits and a similar exercise style.