I didn't review the book previous to this one in the series, at least not at the time of this writing. I had my reasons. Mostly, I was busy, but I was also kinda dissatisfied with the previous book. However, I didn't want to jump the gun, so I decided to wait, and let Mr. Goodkind get his mojo up and running. He's starting a whole new arc after all, and this takes some time and patience to set up. I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt. But, when I got to the end of this one, I just couldn't keep quiet any more. I don't think his mojo is going to manage anything more than a somewhat focused amble, nevermind a run.
There's a lot missing from this, and I'm not sure where to even start. If I had to guess what the main problem is, it would be that there just isn't any story left. Richard and Kahlan are completely actualized humans according to Goodkind's philosophy, so there's no room for them to grow, which makes them kinda static and boring. They've already faced the worst of the worst, so another dire threat to the world of life is just another Tuesday evening to them. The only way this series can be saved at this point, is to take it in a whole other direction, put the characters in situations wholly unlike anything they've faced before. The author doesn't do this. It's another terrible monster who is out to take over the world because of his philosophical beliefs.
I wanted to see the characters covering new ground, dealing with something new. I wanted a monster that was more ambiguous, one that Richard wasn't going to just hit with a sword. I would be pretty happy to take literally anything else at this point: Richard raising kids, Richard dealing with diplomatic catastrophes (the previous books dipped its toe into this, but quickly set it aside) Richard having a freaking midlife crisis, something. Once again, I find myself wanting Goodkind to tackle some of the more substantial arguments to his philosophy, anything but another "find the bad guy and kill him because he's wrong" arc.
Okay, this book's main philosophical point is about prophecy. Terry thinks prophecy is bad, and I get his argument, but he kinda undermines himself in that he has created a world where prophecy is a real thing that actually predicts stuff. I can understand the idea of dismissing prophecy because it's a bunch of BS, and that makes an interesting real world correlation, but in a world where prophecy is a viable tool, why is it so bad? I understand that it's complex, and that it's easy to misinterpret and misuse, but so is magic and he seems to be fine with people using that. The only real objection I can seem to have to the villain's actions is their methods. Despite that, Richard has elected to throw the baby out with the bathwater, and has resolved to end all prophecy.
It's like, if some guys made a bakery but instead of selling their baked goods, they just threw them at passersby, getting everyone messy and maybe some people slip and fall on the sidewalk and the city council reacted by banning all pastry. That's stupid. Danishes are freaking delicious and make people happy. I shouldn't write reviews while I'm hungry, but that's beside the point. Prophecy, in Goodkind's world is even BETTER than muffins. It allows people to avoid terrible catastrophes and stuff, which as far as I am aware, desserts have never done. I mean, shoot, Richard is himself using prophecy to know that he has to end prophecy. What the actual hell? How does that work? Basically what I'm saying is that this plot kinda makes no sense.
Also, the writing leaves a lot to be desired. It wasn't as prevalent in the first book of this new arc, but this one feels really padded. I want to have a serious talk with whoever edited this, they should have done a lot more to cut the redundant sentences and the paragraphs explaining stuff that happened 50 pages ago. I guess this kind of thing is really great for people who take three months to read a book, but for those of us who only take a few days, it's intensely annoying and distracting. At least we didn't see too many of those pages long flashbacks to events from previous books, because I just skim those nowadays, which is also annoying. I didn't get a book so that I could NOT read it, you know?
There are a few interesting things, here. I'm eager for the writer to get back to Regula, as that has a lot of potential to make a serious point about... something. I'm not sure what, but there are some serious possibilities there. I'm also really interested to see what Nathan has to say about all of this "ending prophecy" stuff as well. I hope it's actually amusing, and not "oh, well if you say prophecy is bad, well then you must be right, Richard", because that will anger me.