Considering how interested I am in photography, I actually read very few biographies of individual photographers.
This book reminded me why I read so few...
I don't know, but I bet that most writers who write biographies of photographers are NOT themselves photographers...Nor curators or art historians or collectors. Not people who, through training or practice, are accomplished at reading or making images.
At least, that seems to be the case here, with this biographer. There are the factual errors he makes,* but maybe worse is the haziness when he discusses CB's work. So few sentences devoted to discussing the Gare Saint Lazare photograph? The photograph that defined the Decisive Moment style? And why did Cartier-Bresson become interested in photography, to begin with? we don't have any real ideas as to why. Much of the time, it feels like the biographer is offering answers off-the-cuff, not based on any uncovered facts or thorough research.
There are some good moments. Cartier-Bresson's childhood and teenage years are vividly-described, as is his time spent in, and escape from, a German POW camp. And the complicated politics of the Magnum photo agency is fairly well narrated.
Don't a lot of people read bios for the juicy gossip tidbits? There's not much of that here, either. Wouldn't his tempestuous, 30-year marriage to the Indonesian dancer Ratna have offered that? Nope, sorry.
The last 100 pages feel like a summation and I'm sitting there with the book in my hand and a handful of potato chips in my mouth yelling "Wait a minute! It's too soon to wrap-up his life just yet. It's only the mid-1950s! He's not dead yet. He's still got a lot of work to do!"
I wish HCB's own book, "The Decisive Moment," would be re-published.
-------------
*Tri-X film wasn't introduced in 35mm format until 1954! Cartier-Bresson couldn't have used it during the first 20+ years of his career! So what film did he use over that period? Help us out, here.