"I do not deny that political torture goes on in this country but there are strict rules against political torture".---Brazilian President General Geisel, 1970s.
"In prison it's not the months and years that creep under your skin. It's the days and hours." PRISONER OF KAFKA by Anonymous
Torture victims suffer from a kind of reverse Stockholm Syndrome. As feminist pioneer Kate Millet documents in this chilling book, studies of exiles from Pinochet's Chile recovering from torture in Sweden blamed THEMSELVES for their having been tortured, along the lines of "If only I hadn't said that he would not have tortured me" or "if only I had taken this street instead of that one I would not have been kidnapped". (Millet, along with Germaine Greer, can tell you from personal experience that many rape victims undergo the same pangs of self-guilt.) Believe it or not, torture as a form of political punishment actually began to fade away at the end of the Nineteenth century, resurged spectacularly in the 1930s, went into decline after World War II and enjoyed, (yes, that's the right word) an amazing rise in the 1970s. Today, like everything else, it has been privatized and outsourced to third parties. While the literature on political imprisonment, including torture and exile is vast, from THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO to CHRIST STOPPED AT EBOLI Millet looks for patterns others might miss. Political cruelty is tied to gender, generation, geography, race and both national and international perception, as in "if we do it, it's not torture". In the Twenty-first century, after Millet's death, torture made another comeback; only this time it came to be known as "advanced interrogation techniques".