AN EXCELLENT SURVEY OF THE LIFE OF SLAVES IN COMMUNITY
John Wesley Blassingame (1940–2000) was an American historian and chairman of the African-American studies program at Yale University.
He wrote in the Preface to this 1972 book, “This book describes and analyzes the life of the black slave: his African heritage, culture, family, acculturation, behavior, religion, and personality. In terms of emphasis, it breaks sharply with American historiographical tradition… By concentrating solely on the planter, historians have… been listening to only one side of a complicated debate. The distorted view of the plantation… are s intimately related to the planter’s projections, desires, and biases that they tell us little about slave behavior and even less about the slave’s inner life, his thoughts, actions self-concepts, or personality… the slave held onto many remnants of his African culture, gained a sense of worth in the quarters, spent most of his time free from surveillance by whites, controlled important aspects of his life, and did some personally meaningful things on his own volition. This relative freedom of thought and action helped the slave to preserve his personal autonomy and to create a culture which has contributed much to American life and thought.”
He notes, “To argue… that [slavery] was easy for [the first slaves] because Africans were by nature docile and submissive is to substitute mythology for history. The enslavement of Africans was intimately related to the history of Indian-white relations in the New World and certain historical and anthropological principles… historically it has been almost impossible to enslave members of societies who are nomadic food gatherers…” (Pg. 2)
He states, “Although a few chiefs sold their own subjects, household slaves or criminals, most African slaves were prisoners captured in tribal wars or kidnapped by slave raiders.” (Pg. 5-6) Later, he adds, “The African who survived the Mid-Passage… had one important advantage, for the experience he was about to face was not entirely unfamiliar to him. Generally, both men and women were accustomed to agricultural labor in Africa and knew of the existence of slavery. In fact, the frequent tribal wars represented a constant reminder of the threat of capture.” (Pg. 10)
He points out, “Many of the Africans resisted enslavement at every step in their forced emigration… they began trying to escape on the long march to the coast. Failing this and suicide attempts while still in sight of their native shores, the Africans mutinied while being transported to the New World and killed their white captors… they rebelled so frequently that a number of ship owners took out insurance to cover losses from mutinies… the Africans continued to resist even after they landed in the New World… Even when they did not run away, the Africans were often obstinate, sullen, and uncooperative laborers.” (Pg. 7-9)
He observes, “In spite of all the restrictions, the slaves were able to draw upon their African heritage to build a strong musical tradition. There is overwhelming evidence of the survival of African song and dance forms in the United States in the nineteenth century. The heyday of African cultural influence on Negro slaves, however, was during the eighteenth century. American clergymen and English missionaries were especially horrified at the ‘idolatrous dances and revels’ of the slaves.” (Pg. 29)
He summarizes, “All things considered, the few Africans enslaved in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century America appear to have survived their traumatic experiences without becoming abjectly docile, infantile or submissive. The Africans retained enough manhood to rebel because the Southern plantation was not a rationally organized institution designed to crush every manifestation of individual will or for systematic extermination… Whatever the impact of slavery on their behavior and attitudes, it did not force them to concentrate all of their psychic energy on survival.” (Pg. 39)
He explains, “Often the most powerful and significant individual on the plantation was the conjurer. The conjurers gained their control over the slaves in various ways. Shrewd men, they generally were industrious enough to avoid punishment. They then told the slaves they were not punished because they had cast a spell on their masters. Claiming the ability to make masters kind, prevent separations cause and prevent pain and suffering, ensure love and happiness, the conjurers were often very successful in gaining adherents. Frequently, there were able to do this because they used their knowledge of the medicinal value of roots and herbs to cure certain illnesses.” (Pg. 45)
He says, “The more pious masters often attempted to develop religious principles in their slaves and encouraged them to attend their own churches. Some slaves, however, refused to do this because of their master’s actions between Sabbaths… Frequently, while in the first flush of his own conversion, a planter required all of his slaves to attend church. Both master and slave might attend a camp meeting… The slaves acquired many of their religious ideas at the camp meetings they attended with their masters… As long as the slaves communed with whites, their religious instruction was circumscribed. The planters, in spite of their piety, insisted that their slaves not learn any of the potentially subversive tenets of Christianity (the brotherhood of all men, for instance). Consequently, no white master could give a full exposition of the gospel to the slaves without incurring the wrath of the planters. Most masters saw religion more as a way of preventing rebellion than as a way of saving the slave’s soul.” (Pg. 60-62)
He continues, “Most slaves, repelled by the brand of religion their masters taught, formulated new ideas and practices in the quarters. The slave’s religious principles were colored by his own longings for freedom and based on half-understood passages from the Old Testament, struggles of the Jews, beautiful pictures of a future life, enchantment and fear, and condemnation of sin… A syncretism of African and conventional religious beliefs, the praise meeting in the quarters was unique in the United States.” (Pg. 64) He adds, “Religious faith often conquered the slave’s fear of his master. The more pious slaves persisted in attending religious services … in spite of floggings… the slave asserted that his master could inflict pain on his body, but he could not harm his Soul.” (Pg. 75)
He states, “A number of planters attempted to promote sexual morality in the quarters, punished the slaves for licentiousness and adultery, and recognized the male as the head of the family… White churches (when slaves attended them) sometimes helped to promote morality in the quarters by excommunicating adulterers and preaching homilies on fidelity… The white man’s lust for black women was one of the most serious impediments to the development of morality. The white man’s pursuit of black women frequently destroyed any possibility that comely black girls could remain chaste for long. Few slave parents could protect their pretty daughters from the sexual advances of white men… The black autobiographers testified that many white men considered every slave cabin as a house of ill-fame.” (Pg. 80-82)
He notes, “By all odds, the most brutal aspect of slavery was the separation of families. This was a haunting fear which made all of the slave’s days miserable. In spite of the fact that probably a majority of the planters tried to prevent family separations in order to maintain plantation discipline, practically all of the black autobiographers were touched by the tragedy.” (Pg. 89) He adds, “The love the slaves had for their parents reveals clearly the importance of the family… the slave family provided an important buffer, a refuge from the rigors of slavery… In his family, the slave… drew on the love and sympathy of its members to raise his spirits. The family was, in short, an important survival mechanism.” (Pg. 103)
He points out, “The slave’s constant prayer, his all-consuming hope, was for liberty… the slave understood clearly what freedom was. He only had to feel the scars on his back, recall the anguished cry of his wife and child as they were torn away from him… to know concretely, what liberty meant… The more slaves knew of freedom, the more desirous they were of obtaining it.” (Pg. 105-107)
He states, “Nowhere does the irrationality of slavery appear as clearly as in the way that slaves were punished… the master was only a man, subject… to miscalculations, to anger, to sadism, and to drink. When angry, masters frequently kicked, slapped, cuffed, or boxed the ears of domestic servants, sometimes flogged pregnant women, and often punished slaves so cruelly that it took them weeks to recover.” (Pg. 162)
He observes, “The few slaves who learned to read gained immeasurable status in the quarters because they had a secret mirror on the outside world and would keep the others informed of events that were transpiring there… So few slaves learned to read and write that they had to develop other skills to maintain their personal autonomy.” (Pg. 207)
This is an excellent book, that will be “must reading” for this seriously studying slavery.