I had two distinct and opposite reactions to this book. As a collection of recipes, it’s got a lot to offer, particularly if you enjoy fresh, healthy, tasty smoothies, juices, dips, and dressings. I’ll certainly be taking inspiration from some of these recipes and can’t wait to try the Green Lemonade.
As a lifestyle book, though, I found this problematic. Gruno’s personal story is certainly inspiring, and I have nothing but respect for how he turned his life around. But he presents his story and philosophies with a fetishistic zeal unlikely to convince anyone who is not already a true believer. He explains how--at the same time he switched from a diet of bagels, cheeseburgers, chocolate bars, and red wine to a raw vegan diet--he gave up caffeine and alcohol, began working out daily at a gym, took up yoga and meditation, joined a vibrant community of like-minded raw food enthusiasts, and eventually started his own health food company. Yet he repeatedly attributes his new vitality, weight loss, improved cholesterol levels, and general happiness to “the power of raw.” There’s no acknowledgement that ANY healthy, nutrient-rich diet--raw or not, vegan, vegetarian, or traditional--would likely have brought similar results when combined with eliminating toxins, exercising vigorously, taking up self-care, participating in a supportive community, and finding a new sense of purpose. Is his raw vegan diet healthful? Certainly. But it’s part of a complex whole, not a magic formula all on its own.
Speaking of magic, in other places, the author makes unsupported claims and implies causal connections that don’t exist. In a chapter entitled “The Science Behind a Raw Food Diet,” we are told that “115 is the magic number. When any food item is heated above 115° F, its nutrient density begins to become comprised [sic] and degraded. We know this because most vitamins are water soluble.” Huh? Why 115? Because “raw foodists believe” it and because Gruno “feel[s] that is an appropriate temperature.” It’s not science to treat a leaf of spinach, a lentil, and an almond as if they were identically fragile. And the presence of the word “because” in the final quoted sentence does not create causation or make it in any way connect with the previous sentence. Gruno also suggests we throw away our microwave ovens because “the convenient packaged foods we love to pull out of the freezer and microwave are often packed with sugar, salt, and saturated fat” Hmm. Who’s “we”? And blaming the microwave for the junk you choose to eat seems a bit like blaming your car if you choose to drive drunk. Elsewhere we hear that 80% raw food to 20% cooked is “the right balance.” Right for whom? And for what? Such dogmatism is frustrating, especially when there’s rarely anything concrete backing it up.
So, yes, I had some real problems with the book as a lifestyle guide and with its claims to scientific accuracy. But I’m certainly happy to have the recipes, and Brad’s Kale Chips sound yummy--I’ll be looking for them at my health food store.
Thank you to Brad Gruno and the Goodreads First-Reads Program for the opportunity to read and review this book. (Note: My copy was an uncorrected proof. I reviewed it under the assumption that the many errors will be corrected before it goes to final press.)