I never write reviews. Seriously. The last one I can recall writing was more than a dozen years ago. I finished FlashWired, though, and was perturbed enough that I had to put my thoughts down somewhere.
You might notice that I haven't provided a rating. There's a good reason for that. For most of the story, I'd have said it should get 4 stars. In my book, that means more or less that I really liked it, but that it wasn't a favorite. The writing was good, and the characters and setting were interesting, despite the fact that such a short story doesn't leave room for a whole lot of detail.
Then I got to the rescue. I noticed that I was about 66% of the way through the book, and was all set for Jeeze's recovery (or at least the beginnings thereof) and for he and Cal to start making their way toward their HEA. Then, at 70%, I hit the end. I was shocked, and not pleasantly so. I immediately wanted to go and give it one star, a rating I almost never use, because it means I absolutely hated a book.
<rant>
Intellectually, I understand the reasoning behind having such an ending. It's certainly a valid choice, to leave the reader wondering what happened after. Or to let the reader imagine an aftermath of his own. Unfortunately, that just didn't work for me. When I read fiction, it's because I want to be entertained. I'm generally not looking for anything particularly thought provoking or that requires a whole lot of effort on my part. When I want to exercise my creativity, I don't do it by pulling out someone else's fiction.
When I read a romance, I generally want an HEA. I'm OK with the occasional HFN or even a lack of resolution pending a sequel. Having none of the above does not make me happy. Not having any warning that there's no HEA doesn't help. Compounding that by having the last 30% of the file be a preview of an unrelated book? That just pissed me off.
Every genre has its own conventions. When I read high fantasy, I expect a somewhat medieval setting with swords and armor and maybe magic. If I start seeing guns and computers, I tend to get upset--unless I've been warned that I'm not getting a straightforward high fantasy. Then I can decide if I want to hold off on that book for the time being or if I'm in the mood for something a little different. The same holds true for romance. I expect an HEA. (Heck, the HEA is, to an extent, the point of reading romance.) If I'm not going to get one, I want some sort of clue beforehand, so that I can make an educated decision about whether that's the book I want to be reading at that moment. Posing questions in the blurb that remain unanswered in the book does not constitute such a clue.
</rant>
At any rate, I couldn't decide between the 4-star rating and the 1-star rating. I was going to compromise and give it 3-stars, but that just wouldn't be accurate, so I figured not rating it at all would be most honest.