An easy to follow, succinct overview of the history and three main leaders in pragmatism with three different views - Charles, James, and Dewey.
I related the most to Dewey's pragmatism which combines some of Charles' and James' ideas and focuses on social life and its betterment, a belief that real world problems are most important, a social nature of successful inquiry.
Trying to get ahead in my reading for this semester. 1 down, 15 to go!
"Charles Peirce identifies and examines three methods of settling belief... tenacity, authority, and ad priori. And he rejects all three. In other words, we are unlikely to reach the truth if we start with an answer and tenaciously refuse to question it. We are unlikely to find truth if we use our authority to prevent questioning. And we probably will fall short if we simply assume something to be true. All three of these methods are inadequate because they essentially use psychological tools in an effort to satisfy logical problems. Peirce proposes the method of science, which professes not to know the answer in advance. Science is a kind of collective inquiry using the minds of all the interested members in the community to propose and evaluate beliefs. The scientific method emphasizes that it’s possible and even likely that individuals will make errors, and science deals with such errors by making inquiry cooperative. This means that among the four methods for fixing beliefs, science is the only one that is always corrigible or capable of being improved. Moreover to participate in a scientific enterprise, each experimenter must have an attitude that acknowledges personal availability and they need to cooperate with others."