Another inappropriately named novel in the Waverley series. The title character probably graces far less than 100 of the novel's approximate 750 pp. and is a relatively light weight entity for all that. However, her family history is certainly an interesting one, with her absent father the Count of Geierstein, operating incognito in more than one personage. As well, there is a noted degree of the supernatural attending her now deceased mother and her maternal grandfather and grandmother, both of whom dabbled in eastern mysteries. Anne's wraith-like appearances early on in the novel do much to draw the interest of Arthur Philipson, whose personage has a much stronger claim to be the real focus of the novel. A supposed merchant's son, he meets Anne while traveling through Switzerland with his father. Their true identities are not revealed until about half way through the novel, although most who encounter the young man suspect the truth. He is a standard Scott hero: a little romantic, trusty with a sword, honorable above all else, dutiful to his familial and political leaders and quite prone to allowing his affections for a lovely young lady get the better of him. Anne and he say solemn, final farewells to one another several times throughout the story, but the reader never even comes close to believing that any of them will come to pass. However, forget Anne and Arthur: the real story is that of Charles the Bold, the Duke of Burgundy. He is sympathetic to the cause of Margaret of Anjou, the exiled Lancaster Queen who has been forced to leave England with the victory of Edward IV for the cause of York in the protracted War of the Roses. Plans are made for Burgundy to take the provinces of Lorraine (contested for by the young upstart Ferrand de Vaudemont) and Provence (ruled by the charmingly ineffectual King Rene) and then support an Lancaster-led invasion of England while Edward is in France trying to wrest lost provinces from Louis XI. However, Burgundy's headstrong and ill-considered desire to teach the Swiss a lesson lead to exceptionally poor results for him and his supporters. He wants to do so largely due to the fate of one Archibald de Hagenbach, a German robber-baron who, along with his aide Kilian, made for some of the best characterizations in the entire novel and, once again to my regret, they get killed off far too soon! They were truly evil in their unbridled selfishness and lack of conscience. The nefarious Campo-Basso and the steady, earnest Colvin, respectively work against and for Burgundy's aims. The operation of the mysterious Vehmique Court, which has assumed for itself ultimate powers to judge and execute those it finds guilty, work their way out through the machinations of Anne's father on the fate of Burgundy. Covering much the same historical period as the earlier Quentin Durward, this novel gives a truly mesmerizing characterization of this mercurial leader, whom Margaret characterized as 'wilful, sudden, haughty and unpersuadable' and whom Scott states combined in a truly unique manner 'cruelty and justice, magnanimity with meanness, economy with extravagance, and liberty with avarice'. The final note on his eventual death describes what its writer felt to be the wealthiest Duchy in all of Europe, one which ceased to be by the events described at the conclusion of this novel. The minor character of Sigismund, a slow-thinking, but seemingly resourceful Swiss farmer/soldier, is very well drawn, and the scene in the Inn of the Golden Fleece, presided over by its domineering John Meng, shows Scott at his humorous best. However, taking the novel as a whole, one must conclude that for once, Scott's sense of historical fascination truly overwhelmed his normal attention to the personalities and motivations of his supposedly principal characters. Still, it made for an excellent story!