This book was an exhaustive look at Stonehenge. Emphasis on exhaustive. I now know a lot more about Stonehenge than before I read it and much of it is fascinating. And it's also going to be a long time before I want to read about Stonehenge again. Or archaeology for that matter.
Written by an archaeologist, Dr. Pearson, it describes how he formed an hypothesis while talking to a follow archaeologist from Madagascar who it seemed obvious to him that Stonehenge was a monument to the dead with the nearby Woodhenge and the Durrington Walls settlement was a place for the living, something that people in Madagascar currently observe. At first Pearson discounted it, but the more he thought about it the more the idea grew on him and he formed some ways to test this idea and then started digging over a period of around 10 years and A. found evidence that confirmed his hypothesis and B. the view that Stonehenge is a monument to the dead and Woodhenge a place for the living now has a lot of acceptance.
What follows is an exhaustive account of what they found, not just at Stonehenge, but Woodhenge, Bluestonehenge, several other Neolithic sites, and the quarries where they had gotten the stones. The problem I ran into here is that I am not a very visual person and I am also a big picture person rather than a small details person, and description after description of geography, geology, and the layouts of cursus, Aubrey holes, and megaliths was difficult to follow. There was also a thorough listing of everything they found and everything that happened on the dig and it was a bit overwhelming. Basically there were so many trees it was easy to get lost in the forest. There were illustrations, and perhaps this was the fault of the ebook version, they didn't seem to follow along with what was being described or would show up several pages later. The color illustrations at the end were good.
There were also some rather abrupt transitions, dropping one line of inquiry rather fast and then moving to something unrelated.
While the book became a chore to read, the findings were fascinating enough that I didn't want to give up on it. I also think people from archaeological backgrounds or who are detail and visual types will have an easier time. And for people who want a well researched book on Stonehenge that isn't full of woo, I would recommend. For everyone else, here are the things I learned that I found most enlightening.
-Stonehenge was one of many megalithic sites in the Neolithic, several of which were in the area of Stonehenge.
-Stongehenge had an equivalent made of wood called Woodhenge and people lived in a nearby settlement known as Durrington Walls.
-Woodhenge and Durrington Walls were for the living, as evidenced by the amazing amount of Neolithic feast trash and houses. Stongehenge was a monument for the dead, as there is no feast trash, no houses, and plenty of cremated and buried remains. The idea that people in the Neolithic thought Stonehenge had healing properties is not supported by the evidence.
-Stonehenge was built and rebuilt over a period of 500 or so years, and the way it was originally constructed was very different from how it was at the end.
-It seems that during this time people moved megaliths from one spot to another, one site to another fairly regularly.
-So many people wonder how and why people would move giant rocks so far, this provided a lot of context for how this was done. Basically it wasn't one group of people moving it from Wales to Stongehenge, but people likely took them from Wales and then when they got to a certain town a new group would take over and then when they got the megalith to a new town another new group would take over, so it was more like a relay.
-The amount of time humans have been around is staggering to think about, especially the time before writing.
-Stonehenge is best explained as being built by people inhabiting Neolithic Britain, not Egypt or Greece and Dr. Pearson was right to not even entertain aliens.
-The place where Stonehenge was built has natural features carved by glaciers that aligned with the solstices, and when the Neolithic people realized it they likely chose to place Stonehenge where it was for that reason.
-I always thought the idea of aliens building Stonehenge to be ludicrous. After reading this, it is simply beyond preposterous to think of. And the idea also pisses me off because when you dismiss engineering feats like this as being aliens, you lose the opportunity to learn a lot about humans.