In ‘Coming Up Short’ the author interviews 100 working class men and women from the US. Many are from Richmond and Lowell, cities that were once key sites of manufacturing and the industrial working class, but are now solidly deindustrialised. The book explores what it is like to come of age as a young working class person in a post-industrial economy.
The 1970’s neoliberal turn towards privatisation and de-regulation obliterated jobs for life and economic stability, now the labour market forces workers to be flexible, precarious and insecure. Silva argues economic upheavals and the collapse of the post-WW2 social-democratic consensus have disrupted young working-class people’s ability to attain traditional markers of success. Things like moving out, buying a home, marrying, child-rearing, having a well-paid job, pulling up your bootstraps and attaining general financial stability.
Traditionally, achieving these markers of success made you an adult. But for many young working class people now the economic conditions have changed so aggressively that reaching these markers is significantly more difficult — or they are at least severely delayed and more likely to be reversible. The impact of this is multifarious, Silva focusses on how these changes in the economic sphere have significantly altered working-class selfhood, and cultural and emotional understandings of success and adulthood.
Silva broadly argues that young working-class people have low levels of class solidarity and consciousness, and instead have absorbed neoliberal ideology. Evidencing this is how many of her interviewees blame their circumstances on personal mistakes. Ideas of self-sufficiency and individualism —the cultural and ideological ideas of neoliberalism— primarily inform these young peoples understandings of themselves and how they should relate to the world (“I can only rely on myself.”) The root blame for their situation, whether it be unemployment, underemployment, addiction, failed relationships or debt, lies not in the economic realm but in personal failings of themselves or their families. Silva links this to historical changes in the power of the organised industrial (white) working class, who as their economic and political power declined, and so too did their class consciousness.
Other negative feelings like betrayal reoccur in young-peoples narratives of their lives. Many of the interviewees had extortionate amounts of debt, usually accrued through school loans and credit cards. Many had gone to university but despite this came out the other side still as bar staff, baristas or doing low paid admin work. Many young working-class people feel betrayed, because performing well academically, or attending university, did not guarantee them a good job and, in reality, the world is not their oyster. As a result, there is increasing hostility and suspicion of the state and state institutions such as schools, universities, social services, who working-class adults feel have duped them.
The collapse of education as being a gateway to secure, well paid employment also has the effect of delivering some canon fodder to the US military industrial complex, as many young adults turn to military enrolment as a path to social mobility, financial security due to benefits in pay and access to public sector jobs when discharged.
Alongside the acceptance of neoliberal ideology, with the collapse of religion, a workplace union or stable family unit to organise life and make sense of the world, young working-class people have turned to pop-psychology, which has infiltrated society at large. A key argument of Silva’s is that working-class adults, unable to realise traditional markets of success, turn to ‘psychic’ or ‘therapeutic’ means to feel fulfilled. ‘Sefl-transformation’ then, overcoming an addiction, recognising and dealing with a mental health problem, addressing childhood trauma, becomes a marker of adulthood and evidence of ‘success’. Being able to overcome personal problems and become a better person is essential in giving an individual a feeling of achievement. Especially as they can no longer attain a feeling of success or achievement in the traditional ways their parents or grandparents could.
In turn, young people attribute their present suffering and difficulty to "previous emotional wounds sustained in childhood", the result being the mystification of the real causes of suffering and difficulty in day to day life, which as Silva argues lie in the economic sphere and the deeply insecure labour market, bullshit jobs and inability to meet basic living costs.
The issue with the turn towards therapy and therapeutic ideas is it that it makes the self both the key actor and main obstacle in achieving success, happiness and well-being. Naturally this leads to narcissism, self indulgence and self reliance. There is also the internalisation of a separate, special identity as a survivors, or as people suffering with x MH problem, or y learning difficulty. Resulting in an “endless array of individual narratives” when in fact a many young working-class people are “struggling with similar, structurally rooted problems” that can only be solved through “collective politicisation”.
I thought Silva dealt well with thinking through the collapse of institutions like marriage, the nuclear family and religion, highlighting it’s complexity. On one hand, the breakdown of the married, nuclear family for working-class males has been negative — lost of self esteem, inability to be an economic breadwinner, yearning for nostalgic forms of family organisation, the growth of incels and red-pilled PUAs. And on the other hand the liberatory outcomes for women and the LGBTQ+ community, as the family and religion were a site of repression. The interviews suggest that cultural ideas about men as main breadwinners remain strong for both working-class men and women. And even some working class women question the “feminist promises of egalitarian gender relationships” as they struggle to juggle work and home responsibilities, instead feeling unfulfilled and desiring to "be taken care of".
Historically marriage was traditionally distinctly gendered, however now due to lack of job security and low income, both individuals have to work, bringing married and cohabiting couple under strain. In reality, “national data reveal a growing “divorce divide” in the United States: since the 1970s, marital dissolution rates have fallen dramatically among highly educated men and women but remained steady among those with lower education such that women with a four-year college degree are half as likely as other women to experience marital dissolution in the first ten years of a marriage.” In terms of navigating intimate relationships in general, Silva identifies a general trend of emotional hesitancy, and a fear of being betrayed or failing, like everything else in society, intimate relationships feel like just another risk on top of every other worry you have.
As I understand it this is a PhD dissertation turned book, it’s a little bit academic and repetitive at points but I think it’s quite accessible, and the authors reliance on qualitative, personal stories and then reflective analysis on these make this a interesting, narrative driven book.